Talk:1264: Slideshow - Revision history

An user who has no account yet at 17:40, 7 September 2023

2023-09-07T17:40:07Z

PotatoGod: /* Snapchat stories */ new section

2018-07-26T21:09:16Z

‎Snapchat stories: new section

89.176.80.96 at 09:04, 23 September 2013

2013-09-23T09:04:33Z

96.254.46.231: Signed muh post

2013-09-18T13:29:26Z

Signed muh post

Dgbrt at 14:01, 16 September 2013

2013-09-16T14:01:19Z

96.254.46.231 at 13:37, 16 September 2013

2013-09-16T13:37:59Z

Spongebog at 20:29, 14 September 2013

2013-09-14T20:29:05Z

Spongebog at 20:28, 14 September 2013

2013-09-14T20:28:43Z

96.254.46.231 at 14:02, 13 September 2013

2013-09-13T14:02:14Z

96.254.46.231: Edited question

2013-09-13T14:01:28Z

Edited question

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:40, 7 September 2023
Line 20:		Line 20:

	Lately Snapchat Stories from some companies have been doing this really badly, where they have animated motion in paragraphs that often progress before you can finish reading them, and loop their stupid intro and outro animations in an incredibly frustrating, distracting way. You can never tell if you need to go back a slide, or wait for the given slide to loop back to the part you were reading. It’s a terrible user experience! [[User:PotatoGod\|PotatoGod]] ([[User talk:PotatoGod\|talk]]) 21:09, 26 July 2018 (UTC)		Lately Snapchat Stories from some companies have been doing this really badly, where they have animated motion in paragraphs that often progress before you can finish reading them, and loop their stupid intro and outro animations in an incredibly frustrating, distracting way. You can never tell if you need to go back a slide, or wait for the given slide to loop back to the part you were reading. It’s a terrible user experience! [[User:PotatoGod\|PotatoGod]] ([[User talk:PotatoGod\|talk]]) 21:09, 26 July 2018 (UTC)
		+
		+	my friend's site in a nutshell [[User:An user who has no account yet\|An user who has no account yet]] ([[User talk:An user who has no account yet\|talk]]) 17:40, 7 September 2023 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:09, 26 July 2018
Line 16:		Line 16:
	:Maybe someone is hard at work collecting those bonus points? [[User:N0lqu\|-boB]] ([[User talk:N0lqu\|talk]]) 13:16, 13 September 2013 (UTC)		:Maybe someone is hard at work collecting those bonus points? [[User:N0lqu\|-boB]] ([[User talk:N0lqu\|talk]]) 13:16, 13 September 2013 (UTC)
	:lol [[Special:Contributions/89.176.80.96\|89.176.80.96]] 09:04, 23 September 2013 (UTC)		:lol [[Special:Contributions/89.176.80.96\|89.176.80.96]] 09:04, 23 September 2013 (UTC)
		+
		+	== Snapchat stories ==
		+
		+	Lately Snapchat Stories from some companies have been doing this really badly, where they have animated motion in paragraphs that often progress before you can finish reading them, and loop their stupid intro and outro animations in an incredibly frustrating, distracting way. You can never tell if you need to go back a slide, or wait for the given slide to loop back to the part you were reading. It’s a terrible user experience! [[User:PotatoGod\|PotatoGod]] ([[User talk:PotatoGod\|talk]]) 21:09, 26 July 2018 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:04, 23 September 2013
Line 15:		Line 15:
	...and it looks like flickr is currently down.... [[User:Spongebog\|Spongebog]] ([[User talk:Spongebog\|talk]]) 10:59, 13 September 2013 (UTC)		...and it looks like flickr is currently down.... [[User:Spongebog\|Spongebog]] ([[User talk:Spongebog\|talk]]) 10:59, 13 September 2013 (UTC)
	:Maybe someone is hard at work collecting those bonus points? [[User:N0lqu\|-boB]] ([[User talk:N0lqu\|talk]]) 13:16, 13 September 2013 (UTC)		:Maybe someone is hard at work collecting those bonus points? [[User:N0lqu\|-boB]] ([[User talk:N0lqu\|talk]]) 13:16, 13 September 2013 (UTC)
		+	:lol [[Special:Contributions/89.176.80.96\|89.176.80.96]] 09:04, 23 September 2013 (UTC)

@@ Line 2: / Line 2: @@
 :Can someone provide an example of this "Ken Burns effect" on Flickr? Was it removed? I'm not exactly an active user of Flickr, but I can't it anywhere. [[Special:Contributions/96.254.46.231|96.254.46.231]] 13:58, 13 September 2013 (UTC)
 :: On flickr, click on any picture, then click on the picture again (take you to full size), then click again (taking you to full screen) -- and then you should see it, if not click again [[User:Spongebog|Spongebog]] ([[User talk:Spongebog|talk]]) 20:28, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
-::: Ah, very good. Although, to be fair, this isn't as intrusive as Randall makes it out to be. It's only shown when you enter that full screen presentational view so it seems appropriate to me. I think the Flickr devs intended this to be a nice way to display a slideshow at a convention booth or the like. {{unsigned ip|96.254.46.231}}
+::: Ah, very good. Although, to be fair, this isn't as intrusive as Randall makes it out to be. It's only shown when you enter that full screen presentational view so it seems appropriate to me. I think the Flickr devs intended this to be a nice way to display a slideshow at a convention booth or the like. [[Special:Contributions/96.254.46.231|96.254.46.231]] 13:29, 18 September 2013 (UTC)
 Adobe Flash isn't mentioned anywhere in the strip, but I think all those "cool-looking" Flash websites that are impossible to search, quote, or link to but still immensely popular with the marketing and PR people may have been an inspiration. --[[User:Koveras|Koveras]] ([[User talk:Koveras|talk]]) 07:42, 13 September 2013 (UTC)

@@ Line 2: / Line 2: @@
 :Can someone provide an example of this "Ken Burns effect" on Flickr? Was it removed? I'm not exactly an active user of Flickr, but I can't it anywhere. [[Special:Contributions/96.254.46.231|96.254.46.231]] 13:58, 13 September 2013 (UTC)
 :: On flickr, click on any picture, then click on the picture again (take you to full size), then click again (taking you to full screen) -- and then you should see it, if not click again [[User:Spongebog|Spongebog]] ([[User talk:Spongebog|talk]]) 20:28, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
-::: Ah, very good. Although, to be fair, this isn't as intrusive as Randall makes it out to be. It's only shown when you enter that full screen presentational view so it seems appropriate to me. I think the Flickr devs intended this to be a nice way to display a slideshow at a convention booth or the like.
+::: Ah, very good. Although, to be fair, this isn't as intrusive as Randall makes it out to be. It's only shown when you enter that full screen presentational view so it seems appropriate to me. I think the Flickr devs intended this to be a nice way to display a slideshow at a convention booth or the like. {{unsigned ip|96.254.46.231}}
 Adobe Flash isn't mentioned anywhere in the strip, but I think all those "cool-looking" Flash websites that are impossible to search, quote, or link to but still immensely popular with the marketing and PR people may have been an inspiration. --[[User:Koveras|Koveras]] ([[User talk:Koveras|talk]]) 07:42, 13 September 2013 (UTC)

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 flickr devs recently changed the site's layout in a quite obtrusive way, which resulted in an outcry from their user base. Among the objectionable changes are slideshows which use the so called "Ken Burns effect". Quoting from Wikipedia: The feature enables a widely used technique of embedding still photographs in motion pictures, displayed with slow zooming and panning effects, and fading transitions between frames. (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ken_Burns_Effect) ... [[User:Plx|Plx]] ([[User talk:Plx|talk]]) 06:57, 13 September 2013 (UTC)
-:Can someone provide an example of this "Ken Burns effect" on Flickr? Was it removed somehow? I'm not exactly an active user of Flickr, but I can't it anywhere. [[Special:Contributions/96.254.46.231|96.254.46.231]] 13:58, 13 September 2013 (UTC)
+:Can someone provide an example of this "Ken Burns effect" on Flickr? Was it removed? I'm not exactly an active user of Flickr, but I can't it anywhere. [[Special:Contributions/96.254.46.231|96.254.46.231]] 13:58, 13 September 2013 (UTC)
 Adobe Flash isn't mentioned anywhere in the strip, but I think all those "cool-looking" Flash websites that are impossible to search, quote, or link to but still immensely popular with the marketing and PR people may have been an inspiration. --[[User:Koveras|Koveras]] ([[User talk:Koveras|talk]]) 07:42, 13 September 2013 (UTC)