Talk:1331: Frequency - Revision history

172.70.86.199: /* Sorting table by frequency doesn’t sort by frequency */

2024-10-07T21:26:04Z

‎Sorting table by frequency doesn’t sort by frequency

Theanswertolifetheuniverseandeverything: /* Sorting table by frequency doesn’t sort by frequency */ new section

2024-10-07T17:13:51Z

‎Sorting table by frequency doesn’t sort by frequency: new section

172.71.178.141: ...not that it really matters. This error is still many many orders larger than the current age of the universe, and even beyond - well into the proton decay era. If I've not erred otherwise.

2022-09-06T04:03:24Z

...not that it really matters. This error is still many many orders larger than the current age of the universe, and even beyond - well into the proton decay era. If I've not erred otherwise.

172.71.178.141: Better if allowed to wrap...

2022-09-06T03:53:47Z

Better if allowed to wrap...

172.70.86.4 at 03:50, 6 September 2022

2022-09-06T03:50:50Z

IJustWantToEditStuff at 01:01, 6 September 2022

2022-09-06T01:01:17Z

CritterKeeper: Peak popularity of Amelia matching Amelia Pond; age soda-drinking starts

2020-05-05T19:00:56Z

Peak popularity of Amelia matching Amelia Pond; age soda-drinking starts

AmbroseChapel at 23:47, 27 August 2017

2017-08-27T23:47:33Z

Davidy22 at 12:16, 20 December 2014

2014-12-20T12:16:42Z

4jonah at 07:12, 20 December 2014

2014-12-20T07:12:31Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:26, 7 October 2024
Line 345:		Line 345:
	== Sorting table by frequency doesn’t sort by frequency ==		== Sorting table by frequency doesn’t sort by frequency ==

−	When I click the heading to sort by it it goes .33, .25, .011, .025, 1.1, 1.4, which doesn’t seem right…	+	When I click the heading to sort by it it goes .33, .25, .011, .025, 1.1, 1.4, which doesn’t seem right… {{unsigned\|Theanswertolifetheuniverseandeverything\|17:13, 7 October 2024}}
		+	:Before checking (and correcting/implementing), I'd say that it's a data-sort-* issue.
		+	:By default, it'll base its sort on the literal cell contents and (unless given an override by data-sort-type="" option) might treat it as a string-sort (where "0.33" and ".33" might sort differently against other things to numeric 0.33 value). There's some allowance for various different forms of numbers (and even some prefixes/suffixes to numbers), but it's easy to 'break' this by changing the contents of a single cell so that it isn't numeric.
		+	:But all this can be 'corrected', as necessary, with a data-sort-value="" cell option. e.g. give the freetext of "about 3" an actual value of 3 for sorting purposes.
		+	:If it's not that (it might not be), maybe I'll discover what it is when I actually go to check. But that's ''normally'' the answer to this sort of thing, for future reference. [[Special:Contributions/172.70.86.199\|172.70.86.199]] 21:26, 7 October 2024 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:13, 7 October 2024
Line 342:		Line 342:
	:If I have all the timings entered correctly (because I just did it on a calculator when I should have gone with a script on the source data) it's... Approximately 2.77x10<sup>46</sup> years.		:If I have all the timings entered correctly (because I just did it on a calculator when I should have gone with a script on the source data) it's... Approximately 2.77x10<sup>46</sup> years.
	:That's because I have factorised the ms durations of each gif (as given above, give or take a typo) and the lowest common multiple is built up as being (2⁷ * 3⁵ * 5⁴ * 7 * 11 * 13 * 19 * 23 * 29² * 31 * 41 * 43 * 47 * 67 * 71 * 79 * 83 * 103 * 127 * 139 * 211 * 269 * 277 * 311 * 401 * 503 * 701 * 1213) milliseconds... But feel free to validate my assumptions. [[Special:Contributions/172.70.86.4\|172.70.86.4]] 03:50, 6 September 2022 (UTC)		:That's because I have factorised the ms durations of each gif (as given above, give or take a typo) and the lowest common multiple is built up as being (2⁷ * 3⁵ * 5⁴ * 7 * 11 * 13 * 19 * 23 * 29² * 31 * 41 * 43 * 47 * 67 * 71 * 79 * 83 * 103 * 127 * 139 * 211 * 269 * 277 * 311 * 401 * 503 * 701 * 1213) milliseconds... But feel free to validate my assumptions. [[Special:Contributions/172.70.86.4\|172.70.86.4]] 03:50, 6 September 2022 (UTC)
		+
		+	== Sorting table by frequency doesn’t sort by frequency ==
		+
		+	When I click the heading to sort by it it goes .33, .25, .011, .025, 1.1, 1.4, which doesn’t seem right…

@@ Line 340: / Line 340: @@
 Anyone want to help calculate the odds of all of these flashing at the same time? [[User:IJustWantToEditStuff|IJustWantToEditStuff]] ([[User talk:IJustWantToEditStuff|talk]]) 01:01, 6 September 2022 (UTC)
-:If I have all the timings entered correctly (because I just did it on a calculator when I should have gone with a script on the source data) it's... Approximately 2.76x10<sup>46</sup> years.
+:If I have all the timings entered correctly (because I just did it on a calculator when I should have gone with a script on the source data) it's... Approximately 2.77x10<sup>46</sup> years.
 :That's because I have factorised the ms durations of each gif (as given above, give or take a typo) and the lowest common multiple is built up as being (2⁷ * 3⁵ * 5⁴ * 7 * 11 * 13 * 19 * 23 * 29² * 31 * 41 * 43 * 47 * 67 * 71 * 79 * 83 * 103 * 127 * 139 * 211 * 269 * 277 * 311 * 401 * 503 * 701 * 1213) milliseconds... But feel free to validate my assumptions. [[Special:Contributions/172.70.86.4|172.70.86.4]] 03:50, 6 September 2022 (UTC)

@@ Line 341: / Line 341: @@
 Anyone want to help calculate the odds of all of these flashing at the same time? [[User:IJustWantToEditStuff|IJustWantToEditStuff]] ([[User talk:IJustWantToEditStuff|talk]]) 01:01, 6 September 2022 (UTC)
 :If I have all the timings entered correctly (because I just did it on a calculator when I should have gone with a script on the source data) it's... Approximately 2.76x10<sup>46</sup> years.
-:That's because I have factorised the ms durations of each gif (as given above, give or take a typo) and the lowest common multiple is built up as being (2⁷*3⁵*5⁴*7*11*13*19*23*29²*31*41*43*47*67*71*79*83*103*127*139*211*269*277*311*401*503*701*1213) milliseconds... But feel free to validate my assumptions. [[Special:Contributions/172.70.86.4|172.70.86.4]] 03:50, 6 September 2022 (UTC)
+:That's because I have factorised the ms durations of each gif (as given above, give or take a typo) and the lowest common multiple is built up as being (2⁷ * 3⁵ * 5⁴ * 7 * 11 * 13 * 19 * 23 * 29² * 31 * 41 * 43 * 47 * 67 * 71 * 79 * 83 * 103 * 127 * 139 * 211 * 269 * 277 * 311 * 401 * 503 * 701 * 1213) milliseconds... But feel free to validate my assumptions. [[Special:Contributions/172.70.86.4|172.70.86.4]] 03:50, 6 September 2022 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:50, 6 September 2022
Line 340:		Line 340:

	Anyone want to help calculate the odds of all of these flashing at the same time? [[User:IJustWantToEditStuff\|IJustWantToEditStuff]] ([[User talk:IJustWantToEditStuff\|talk]]) 01:01, 6 September 2022 (UTC)		Anyone want to help calculate the odds of all of these flashing at the same time? [[User:IJustWantToEditStuff\|IJustWantToEditStuff]] ([[User talk:IJustWantToEditStuff\|talk]]) 01:01, 6 September 2022 (UTC)
		+	:If I have all the timings entered correctly (because I just did it on a calculator when I should have gone with a script on the source data) it's... Approximately 2.76x10<sup>46</sup> years.
		+	:That's because I have factorised the ms durations of each gif (as given above, give or take a typo) and the lowest common multiple is built up as being (2⁷3⁵5⁴71113192329²3141434767717983103127139211269277311401503701*1213) milliseconds... But feel free to validate my assumptions. [[Special:Contributions/172.70.86.4\|172.70.86.4]] 03:50, 6 September 2022 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:01, 6 September 2022
Line 337:		Line 337:

	Not sure if it's the sort of interesting fact that should be added or not, but under the "Sagittarius named Amelia" section, that link to the Baby Name Wizard shows the peak popularity for the name "Amelia" was in 2012. The character of Amelia Pond was on Doctor Who from 2010 to mid-2012, and that was also the height of the immense popularity in America of Matt Smith playing the title role. Might be the source of the popularity of that name. Also, does the previous analysis take into account the fact that Sagittarius named Amelia wouldn't start drinking soda until they are at least a few years old? Would taking out all the ones under the age of five or six let us bring back in SNA in the rest of the world, given that soda is much more popular in America than elsewhere? [[User:CritterKeeper\|CritterKeeper]] ([[User talk:CritterKeeper\|talk]]) 19:00, 5 May 2020 (UTC)		Not sure if it's the sort of interesting fact that should be added or not, but under the "Sagittarius named Amelia" section, that link to the Baby Name Wizard shows the peak popularity for the name "Amelia" was in 2012. The character of Amelia Pond was on Doctor Who from 2010 to mid-2012, and that was also the height of the immense popularity in America of Matt Smith playing the title role. Might be the source of the popularity of that name. Also, does the previous analysis take into account the fact that Sagittarius named Amelia wouldn't start drinking soda until they are at least a few years old? Would taking out all the ones under the age of five or six let us bring back in SNA in the rest of the world, given that soda is much more popular in America than elsewhere? [[User:CritterKeeper\|CritterKeeper]] ([[User talk:CritterKeeper\|talk]]) 19:00, 5 May 2020 (UTC)
		+
		+
		+	Anyone want to help calculate the odds of all of these flashing at the same time? [[User:IJustWantToEditStuff\|IJustWantToEditStuff]] ([[User talk:IJustWantToEditStuff\|talk]]) 01:01, 6 September 2022 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:00, 5 May 2020
Line 333:		Line 333:

	"About half of all cyclists have their bikes stolen, oftentimes more than once, but riders have a 90% chance of theft, all according to this report." It's a very confusing sentence and doesn't match the data in the linked report. About half of all people who ''ever'' cycle get their bikes stolen at some point. People who cycle ''every day'' are 90% more likely to have their bike stolen than people who cycle infrequently. Not 90% chance of theft. I will update this if nobody objects. [[User:AmbroseChapel\|AmbroseChapel]] ([[User talk:AmbroseChapel\|talk]]) 23:47, 27 August 2017 (UTC)		"About half of all cyclists have their bikes stolen, oftentimes more than once, but riders have a 90% chance of theft, all according to this report." It's a very confusing sentence and doesn't match the data in the linked report. About half of all people who ''ever'' cycle get their bikes stolen at some point. People who cycle ''every day'' are 90% more likely to have their bike stolen than people who cycle infrequently. Not 90% chance of theft. I will update this if nobody objects. [[User:AmbroseChapel\|AmbroseChapel]] ([[User talk:AmbroseChapel\|talk]]) 23:47, 27 August 2017 (UTC)
		+
		+
		+
		+	Not sure if it's the sort of interesting fact that should be added or not, but under the "Sagittarius named Amelia" section, that link to the Baby Name Wizard shows the peak popularity for the name "Amelia" was in 2012. The character of Amelia Pond was on Doctor Who from 2010 to mid-2012, and that was also the height of the immense popularity in America of Matt Smith playing the title role. Might be the source of the popularity of that name. Also, does the previous analysis take into account the fact that Sagittarius named Amelia wouldn't start drinking soda until they are at least a few years old? Would taking out all the ones under the age of five or six let us bring back in SNA in the rest of the world, given that soda is much more popular in America than elsewhere? [[User:CritterKeeper\|CritterKeeper]] ([[User talk:CritterKeeper\|talk]]) 19:00, 5 May 2020 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:47, 27 August 2017
Line 331:		Line 331:

	All fields are now filled out to the best of my ability. I have not edited ones already completed, but finished empty ones as accurately as possible. {{unsigned\|4jonah}}		All fields are now filled out to the best of my ability. I have not edited ones already completed, but finished empty ones as accurately as possible. {{unsigned\|4jonah}}
		+
		+	"About half of all cyclists have their bikes stolen, oftentimes more than once, but riders have a 90% chance of theft, all according to this report." It's a very confusing sentence and doesn't match the data in the linked report. About half of all people who ''ever'' cycle get their bikes stolen at some point. People who cycle ''every day'' are 90% more likely to have their bike stolen than people who cycle infrequently. Not 90% chance of theft. I will update this if nobody objects. [[User:AmbroseChapel\|AmbroseChapel]] ([[User talk:AmbroseChapel\|talk]]) 23:47, 27 August 2017 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:16, 20 December 2014
Line 330:		Line 330:


−	All fields are now filled out to the best of my ability. I have not edited ones already completed, but finished empty ones as accurately as possible.	+	All fields are now filled out to the best of my ability. I have not edited ones already completed, but finished empty ones as accurately as possible. {{unsigned\|4jonah}}

← Older revision		Revision as of 07:12, 20 December 2014
Line 328:		Line 328:

	I'm filling in the remaining fields the best I can. I did the last one; Denver pizza. Math is not my strong point. It's probably a joke statistic, but someone may want to double-check my math. I didn't see any figures for Denver's pizza consumption, but I figured it was one of those things where it just maybe worked out to match the Denver population. {{unsigned\|4jonah}}		I'm filling in the remaining fields the best I can. I did the last one; Denver pizza. Math is not my strong point. It's probably a joke statistic, but someone may want to double-check my math. I didn't see any figures for Denver's pizza consumption, but I figured it was one of those things where it just maybe worked out to match the Denver population. {{unsigned\|4jonah}}
		+
		+
		+	All fields are now filled out to the best of my ability. I have not edited ones already completed, but finished empty ones as accurately as possible.