Talk:1597: Git - Revision history

162.158.127.164 at 22:26, 6 May 2025

2025-05-06T22:26:18Z

Treeplate at 16:22, 1 May 2024

2024-05-01T16:22:25Z

108.162.216.106 at 05:33, 25 July 2017

2017-07-25T05:33:49Z

Draco18s at 16:17, 12 September 2016

2016-09-12T16:17:36Z

162.158.60.5 at 20:35, 21 December 2015

2015-12-21T20:35:21Z

Daskas at 05:53, 13 November 2015

2015-11-13T05:53:52Z

108.162.220.239 at 06:00, 7 November 2015

2015-11-07T06:00:31Z

108.162.220.239 at 05:58, 7 November 2015

2015-11-07T05:58:36Z

Kripmo: removed my comments

2015-11-05T07:42:10Z

removed my comments

Daskas at 13:44, 3 November 2015

2015-11-03T13:44:40Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:26, 6 May 2025
Line 78:		Line 78:

	Git lets you have one account for repos connected via SSH, and another account for repos connected via HTTPS. Who thought this was a good idea? [[User:Treeplate\|Treeplate]] ([[User talk:Treeplate\|talk]]) 16:22, 1 May 2024 (UTC)		Git lets you have one account for repos connected via SSH, and another account for repos connected via HTTPS. Who thought this was a good idea? [[User:Treeplate\|Treeplate]] ([[User talk:Treeplate\|talk]]) 16:22, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
		+
		+	Or just delete the .git folder [[Special:Contributions/162.158.127.164\|162.158.127.164]] 22:26, 6 May 2025 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:22, 1 May 2024
Line 76:		Line 76:

	I'd like to recommend a [http://learngitbranching.js.org/ site I found] on a recent (at the time of this comment) [https://cseducators.stackexchange.com/a/2921 CS Educator stackexchange post.] [[Special:Contributions/108.162.216.106\|108.162.216.106]] 05:33, 25 July 2017 (UTC)		I'd like to recommend a [http://learngitbranching.js.org/ site I found] on a recent (at the time of this comment) [https://cseducators.stackexchange.com/a/2921 CS Educator stackexchange post.] [[Special:Contributions/108.162.216.106\|108.162.216.106]] 05:33, 25 July 2017 (UTC)
		+
		+	Git lets you have one account for repos connected via SSH, and another account for repos connected via HTTPS. Who thought this was a good idea? [[User:Treeplate\|Treeplate]] ([[User talk:Treeplate\|talk]]) 16:22, 1 May 2024 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:33, 25 July 2017
Line 74:		Line 74:

	Someone made a [http://ohshitgit.com/ website] to be that "smart guy on the other end of the phone." The final entry on the page is this comic for sure.--[[User:Draco18s\|Draco18s]] ([[User talk:Draco18s\|talk]]) 16:17, 12 September 2016 (UTC)		Someone made a [http://ohshitgit.com/ website] to be that "smart guy on the other end of the phone." The final entry on the page is this comic for sure.--[[User:Draco18s\|Draco18s]] ([[User talk:Draco18s\|talk]]) 16:17, 12 September 2016 (UTC)
		+
		+	I'd like to recommend a [http://learngitbranching.js.org/ site I found] on a recent (at the time of this comment) [https://cseducators.stackexchange.com/a/2921 CS Educator stackexchange post.] [[Special:Contributions/108.162.216.106\|108.162.216.106]] 05:33, 25 July 2017 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:17, 12 September 2016
Line 72:		Line 72:

	Wow, it's amazing how there are comments above defending git: those commentators lost the fact that XDCD is making fun of git because of it's idealistic view of source control doesn't map at all to reality, which in many cases, leads to user frustration and... dare I say it, lost data and lost productivity. Git is a joke and XKCD highlighted that well :) [[Special:Contributions/162.158.60.5\|162.158.60.5]] 20:35, 21 December 2015 (UTC)		Wow, it's amazing how there are comments above defending git: those commentators lost the fact that XDCD is making fun of git because of it's idealistic view of source control doesn't map at all to reality, which in many cases, leads to user frustration and... dare I say it, lost data and lost productivity. Git is a joke and XKCD highlighted that well :) [[Special:Contributions/162.158.60.5\|162.158.60.5]] 20:35, 21 December 2015 (UTC)
		+
		+	Someone made a [http://ohshitgit.com/ website] to be that "smart guy on the other end of the phone." The final entry on the page is this comic for sure.--[[User:Draco18s\|Draco18s]] ([[User talk:Draco18s\|talk]]) 16:17, 12 September 2016 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:35, 21 December 2015
Line 70:		Line 70:

	The current explanation is wrong [not anymore, it's excellent now!]. As others have stated, the comic is clearly making fun of git itself, NOT of its users. [[User:Daskas\|Daskas]] ([[User talk:Daskas\|talk]]) 13:44, 3 November 2015 (UTC)		The current explanation is wrong [not anymore, it's excellent now!]. As others have stated, the comic is clearly making fun of git itself, NOT of its users. [[User:Daskas\|Daskas]] ([[User talk:Daskas\|talk]]) 13:44, 3 November 2015 (UTC)
		+
		+	Wow, it's amazing how there are comments above defending git: those commentators lost the fact that XDCD is making fun of git because of it's idealistic view of source control doesn't map at all to reality, which in many cases, leads to user frustration and... dare I say it, lost data and lost productivity. Git is a joke and XKCD highlighted that well :) [[Special:Contributions/162.158.60.5\|162.158.60.5]] 20:35, 21 December 2015 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:53, 13 November 2015
Line 69:		Line 69:
	The title text may be referring to the famous saying: "Git is really pretty simple, just think of branches as homeomorphic endofunctors mapping submanifolds of a Hilbert space." [[Special:Contributions/162.158.255.40\|162.158.255.40]] 23:23, 2 November 2015 (UTC)		The title text may be referring to the famous saying: "Git is really pretty simple, just think of branches as homeomorphic endofunctors mapping submanifolds of a Hilbert space." [[Special:Contributions/162.158.255.40\|162.158.255.40]] 23:23, 2 November 2015 (UTC)

−	The current explanation is wrong. As others have stated, the comic is clearly making fun of git itself, NOT of its users. [[User:Daskas\|Daskas]] ([[User talk:Daskas\|talk]]) 13:44, 3 November 2015 (UTC)	+	The current explanation is wrong [not anymore, it's excellent now!]. As others have stated, the comic is clearly making fun of git itself, NOT of its users. [[User:Daskas\|Daskas]] ([[User talk:Daskas\|talk]]) 13:44, 3 November 2015 (UTC)

@@ Line 19: / Line 19: @@
 I think you guys need to differentiate between the underlying data scheme, and the command line. The way git stores underlying data is indeed beautiful, but the command-line is the worst UI ever. You know how you switch to working on a different branch? "git checkout". You know how you revert the changes you've made to a file?  "git checkout".  You know how you make a new branch? "git checkout -b". If you're used to other systems, you'll find nearly every operations - even common ones - counterintuitively named. I work at Google and even here, every week someone near me screws up their respository enough that they have to save their work, nuke their repo, reapply their changes, and try moving forward again. I don't know why anyone puts up with this! (Actually I do - it's because if you're collaborating between companies, git does it better than anything else.) [[Special:Contributions/199.27.129.107|199.27.129.107]] 18:46, 2 November 2015 (UTC)
-: That's not actually true. git checkout takes you to a node of development, as a convenience that can be either the entire code base (a branch) or a single file. You could remove the file you want to 'revert', stash all other changes, checkout HEAD and then pop the stash...or use the git checkout FILE shortcut. git checkout -b is just a shortcut so you don't have to do git branch; git checkout.
+: That's not actually true. git checkout takes you to a node of development, as a convenience that can be either the entire code base (a branch) or a single file. You could remove the file you want to 'revert', stash all other changes, checkout HEAD and then pop the stash...or use the git checkout FILE shortcut. git checkout -b is just a shortcut so you don't have to do git branch; git checkout. [[Special:Contributions/108.162.220.239|108.162.220.239]] 06:00, 7 November 2015 (UTC)
 I feel like this article should end with a quick guide to git commands. {{unsigned ip|108.162.216.27}}

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:58, 7 November 2015
Line 18:		Line 18:

	I think you guys need to differentiate between the underlying data scheme, and the command line. The way git stores underlying data is indeed beautiful, but the command-line is the worst UI ever. You know how you switch to working on a different branch? "git checkout". You know how you revert the changes you've made to a file? "git checkout". You know how you make a new branch? "git checkout -b". If you're used to other systems, you'll find nearly every operations - even common ones - counterintuitively named. I work at Google and even here, every week someone near me screws up their respository enough that they have to save their work, nuke their repo, reapply their changes, and try moving forward again. I don't know why anyone puts up with this! (Actually I do - it's because if you're collaborating between companies, git does it better than anything else.) [[Special:Contributions/199.27.129.107\|199.27.129.107]] 18:46, 2 November 2015 (UTC)		I think you guys need to differentiate between the underlying data scheme, and the command line. The way git stores underlying data is indeed beautiful, but the command-line is the worst UI ever. You know how you switch to working on a different branch? "git checkout". You know how you revert the changes you've made to a file? "git checkout". You know how you make a new branch? "git checkout -b". If you're used to other systems, you'll find nearly every operations - even common ones - counterintuitively named. I work at Google and even here, every week someone near me screws up their respository enough that they have to save their work, nuke their repo, reapply their changes, and try moving forward again. I don't know why anyone puts up with this! (Actually I do - it's because if you're collaborating between companies, git does it better than anything else.) [[Special:Contributions/199.27.129.107\|199.27.129.107]] 18:46, 2 November 2015 (UTC)
		+
		+	: That's not actually true. git checkout takes you to a node of development, as a convenience that can be either the entire code base (a branch) or a single file. You could remove the file you want to 'revert', stash all other changes, checkout HEAD and then pop the stash...or use the git checkout FILE shortcut. git checkout -b is just a shortcut so you don't have to do git branch; git checkout.

	I feel like this article should end with a quick guide to git commands. {{unsigned ip\|108.162.216.27}}		I feel like this article should end with a quick guide to git commands. {{unsigned ip\|108.162.216.27}}

← Older revision		Revision as of 07:42, 5 November 2015
Line 32:		Line 32:

	Should someone mention how git is by default used through a terminal - which is often more confusing than a GUI for most people - and that while there are graphical shells for git, some people refuse to use them because they're not fully-featured? [[Special:Contributions/108.162.221.36\|108.162.221.36]] 11:43, 30 October 2015 (UTC)		Should someone mention how git is by default used through a terminal - which is often more confusing than a GUI for most people - and that while there are graphical shells for git, some people refuse to use them because they're not fully-featured? [[Special:Contributions/108.162.221.36\|108.162.221.36]] 11:43, 30 October 2015 (UTC)
−
−	Shit. I use git for almost a year and I delete my repos more often than I'd like to admit. I'm going to read [https://www.git-scm.com/book/en/v2] and (hopefully) fix this once and for all. [[User:Kripmo\|Kripmo]] ([[User talk:Kripmo\|talk]]) 02:04, 31 October 2015 (UTC)
−	:It was way easier than I thought. This is what I needed: git reset --hard <commit before fuck up>. Its alias will be fu. [[User:Kripmo\|Kripmo]] ([[User talk:Kripmo\|talk]]) 08:10, 31 October 2015 (UTC)

	The really sad part of all this is that if you work in a multi-dev environment and <i>anyone</i> on the team is doing what Cueball suggests, it negates every other user's ability to use the main trunk properly. [[User:Ericm301\|Ericm301]] ([[User talk:Ericm301\|talk]]) 02:26, 31 October 2015 (UTC)		The really sad part of all this is that if you work in a multi-dev environment and <i>anyone</i> on the team is doing what Cueball suggests, it negates every other user's ability to use the main trunk properly. [[User:Ericm301\|Ericm301]] ([[User talk:Ericm301\|talk]]) 02:26, 31 October 2015 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:44, 3 November 2015
Line 69:		Line 69:

	The title text may be referring to the famous saying: "Git is really pretty simple, just think of branches as homeomorphic endofunctors mapping submanifolds of a Hilbert space." [[Special:Contributions/162.158.255.40\|162.158.255.40]] 23:23, 2 November 2015 (UTC)		The title text may be referring to the famous saying: "Git is really pretty simple, just think of branches as homeomorphic endofunctors mapping submanifolds of a Hilbert space." [[Special:Contributions/162.158.255.40\|162.158.255.40]] 23:23, 2 November 2015 (UTC)
		+
		+	The current explanation is wrong. As others have stated, the comic is clearly making fun of git itself, NOT of its users. [[User:Daskas\|Daskas]] ([[User talk:Daskas\|talk]]) 13:44, 3 November 2015 (UTC)