Talk:195: Map of the Internet - Revision history

Squishmallow fan at 20:59, 4 August 2024

2024-08-04T20:59:27Z

An user who has no account yet at 07:39, 6 September 2023

2023-09-06T07:39:49Z

MegaMutant453 at 04:56, 12 November 2022

2022-11-12T04:56:51Z

172.68.59.144: 10.0.0.0/8 subnet aka ::ffff:a00:0/104 subnet

2019-04-28T21:35:07Z

10.0.0.0/8 subnet aka ::ffff:a00:0/104 subnet

172.68.142.89 at 18:24, 15 June 2018

2018-06-15T18:24:18Z

172.68.142.89 at 18:21, 15 June 2018

2018-06-15T18:21:31Z

172.68.142.89 at 18:21, 15 June 2018

2018-06-15T18:21:00Z

172.68.142.89 at 18:15, 15 June 2018

2018-06-15T18:15:57Z

172.68.253.203 at 01:51, 7 July 2017

2017-07-07T01:51:37Z

108.162.249.158 at 22:34, 7 May 2016

2016-05-07T22:34:50Z

@@ Line 3: / Line 3: @@
 Why am I in various registrars?[[Special:Contributions/141.101.104.186|141.101.104.186]]
 : Simply because one of those various registrars is your interwebz provider. [[User:Sobsz|Sobsz]] ([[User talk:Sobsz|talk]]) 19:55, 21 November 2015 (UTC)
+:: and im in 173, not in various registrars [[User:Squishmallow fan|Squishmallow fan]] ([[User talk:Squishmallow fan|talk]]) 20:59, 4 August 2024 (UTC)
 I'd like to see an updated version, 10 years later.  I think all the green would be gone. [[User:Microbe|Microbe]]

← Older revision		Revision as of 07:39, 6 September 2023
Line 10:		Line 10:
	Since the table is for the first octet only, it's not possible to show the 172.16-172.31 block. Drawing a table big enough is left to you as an exercise. However, he shows Class E addresses (240-255) as "unallocated", which is a bit misleading because routers are required by [https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc1812#section-5.3.7 RFC 1812] to discard packets with these addresses, which are reserved for "future use". [[Special:Contributions/172.68.142.89\|172.68.142.89]] 18:21, 15 June 2018 (UTC)		Since the table is for the first octet only, it's not possible to show the 172.16-172.31 block. Drawing a table big enough is left to you as an exercise. However, he shows Class E addresses (240-255) as "unallocated", which is a bit misleading because routers are required by [https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc1812#section-5.3.7 RFC 1812] to discard packets with these addresses, which are reserved for "future use". [[Special:Contributions/172.68.142.89\|172.68.142.89]] 18:21, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
	:However, 10.0.0.0/8 is a full class A subnet that is on the same footing as 172.16.0.0/12 and 192.168.0.0/16, yet is labeled "VPNs" in this comic. [[Special:Contributions/172.68.59.144\|172.68.59.144]] 21:35, 28 April 2019 (UTC)		:However, 10.0.0.0/8 is a full class A subnet that is on the same footing as 172.16.0.0/12 and 192.168.0.0/16, yet is labeled "VPNs" in this comic. [[Special:Contributions/172.68.59.144\|172.68.59.144]] 21:35, 28 April 2019 (UTC)
		+
		+	i'm sure ip 1.2.3.4 exists somewhere [[User:An user who has no account yet\|An user who has no account yet]] ([[User talk:An user who has no account yet\|talk]]) 07:39, 6 September 2023 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:56, 12 November 2022
Line 1:		Line 1:
		+	If one ip address was a square of area 100 by 100 ft, this entire map would be 1241 miles across, for a total area of 1.541 million square miles. That's about 41% the area of the United States, the size of a medium-to-large country. The ipv6 map would be half the size of the galaxy. [[User:MegaMutant453\|MegaMutant453]] ([[User talk:MegaMutant453\|talk]]) 04:56, 12 November 2022 (UTC)
		+
	Why am I in various registrars?[[Special:Contributions/141.101.104.186\|141.101.104.186]]		Why am I in various registrars?[[Special:Contributions/141.101.104.186\|141.101.104.186]]
	: Simply because one of those various registrars is your interwebz provider. [[User:Sobsz\|Sobsz]] ([[User talk:Sobsz\|talk]]) 19:55, 21 November 2015 (UTC)		: Simply because one of those various registrars is your interwebz provider. [[User:Sobsz\|Sobsz]] ([[User talk:Sobsz\|talk]]) 19:55, 21 November 2015 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:35, 28 April 2019
Line 7:		Line 7:

	Since the table is for the first octet only, it's not possible to show the 172.16-172.31 block. Drawing a table big enough is left to you as an exercise. However, he shows Class E addresses (240-255) as "unallocated", which is a bit misleading because routers are required by [https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc1812#section-5.3.7 RFC 1812] to discard packets with these addresses, which are reserved for "future use". [[Special:Contributions/172.68.142.89\|172.68.142.89]] 18:21, 15 June 2018 (UTC)		Since the table is for the first octet only, it's not possible to show the 172.16-172.31 block. Drawing a table big enough is left to you as an exercise. However, he shows Class E addresses (240-255) as "unallocated", which is a bit misleading because routers are required by [https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc1812#section-5.3.7 RFC 1812] to discard packets with these addresses, which are reserved for "future use". [[Special:Contributions/172.68.142.89\|172.68.142.89]] 18:21, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
		+	:However, 10.0.0.0/8 is a full class A subnet that is on the same footing as 172.16.0.0/12 and 192.168.0.0/16, yet is labeled "VPNs" in this comic. [[Special:Contributions/172.68.59.144\|172.68.59.144]] 21:35, 28 April 2019 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:24, 15 June 2018
Line 6:		Line 6:
	He forgot the 172.16-172.31 private block. Way late, I know but I only just noticed. [[Special:Contributions/172.68.253.203\|172.68.253.203]] 01:51, 7 July 2017 (UTC)		He forgot the 172.16-172.31 private block. Way late, I know but I only just noticed. [[Special:Contributions/172.68.253.203\|172.68.253.203]] 01:51, 7 July 2017 (UTC)

−	Since the table is for the first octet only, it's not possible to show the 172.16-172.31 block. Drawing a table big enough is left to you as an exercise. However, he shows Class E addresses (240-255) as "unallocated", which is a bit misleading because routers are required by [https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc1812 RFC 1812] to discard packets with these addresses, which are reserved for "future use". [[Special:Contributions/172.68.142.89\|172.68.142.89]] 18:21, 15 June 2018 (UTC)	+	Since the table is for the first octet only, it's not possible to show the 172.16-172.31 block. Drawing a table big enough is left to you as an exercise. However, he shows Class E addresses (240-255) as "unallocated", which is a bit misleading because routers are required by [https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc1812#section-5.3.7 RFC 1812] to discard packets with these addresses, which are reserved for "future use". [[Special:Contributions/172.68.142.89\|172.68.142.89]] 18:21, 15 June 2018 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:21, 15 June 2018
Line 6:		Line 6:
	He forgot the 172.16-172.31 private block. Way late, I know but I only just noticed. [[Special:Contributions/172.68.253.203\|172.68.253.203]] 01:51, 7 July 2017 (UTC)		He forgot the 172.16-172.31 private block. Way late, I know but I only just noticed. [[Special:Contributions/172.68.253.203\|172.68.253.203]] 01:51, 7 July 2017 (UTC)

−	Since the table is for the first octet only, it's not possible to show the 172.16-172.31 block. Drawing a table big enough is left to you as an exercise. However, he shows Class E addresses (240-255) as "unallocated", which is a bit misleading because routers are required by [https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc1812\|RFC 1812] to discard packets with these addresses, which are reserved for "future use". [[Special:Contributions/172.68.142.89\|172.68.142.89]] 18:21, 15 June 2018 (UTC)	+	Since the table is for the first octet only, it's not possible to show the 172.16-172.31 block. Drawing a table big enough is left to you as an exercise. However, he shows Class E addresses (240-255) as "unallocated", which is a bit misleading because routers are required by [https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc1812 RFC 1812] to discard packets with these addresses, which are reserved for "future use". [[Special:Contributions/172.68.142.89\|172.68.142.89]] 18:21, 15 June 2018 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:15, 15 June 2018
Line 5:		Line 5:

	He forgot the 172.16-172.31 private block. Way late, I know but I only just noticed. [[Special:Contributions/172.68.253.203\|172.68.253.203]] 01:51, 7 July 2017 (UTC)		He forgot the 172.16-172.31 private block. Way late, I know but I only just noticed. [[Special:Contributions/172.68.253.203\|172.68.253.203]] 01:51, 7 July 2017 (UTC)
		+
		+	Since the table is for the first octet only, it's not possible to show the 172.16-172.31 block. Drawing a table big enough is left to you as an exercise.

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:51, 7 July 2017
Line 3:		Line 3:

	I'd like to see an updated version, 10 years later. I think all the green would be gone. [[User:Microbe\|Microbe]]		I'd like to see an updated version, 10 years later. I think all the green would be gone. [[User:Microbe\|Microbe]]
		+
		+	He forgot the 172.16-172.31 private block. Way late, I know but I only just noticed. [[Special:Contributions/172.68.253.203\|172.68.253.203]] 01:51, 7 July 2017 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:34, 7 May 2016
Line 1:		Line 1:
	Why am I in various registrars?[[Special:Contributions/141.101.104.186\|141.101.104.186]]		Why am I in various registrars?[[Special:Contributions/141.101.104.186\|141.101.104.186]]
	: Simply because one of those various registrars is your interwebz provider. [[User:Sobsz\|Sobsz]] ([[User talk:Sobsz\|talk]]) 19:55, 21 November 2015 (UTC)		: Simply because one of those various registrars is your interwebz provider. [[User:Sobsz\|Sobsz]] ([[User talk:Sobsz\|talk]]) 19:55, 21 November 2015 (UTC)
		+
		+	I'd like to see an updated version, 10 years later. I think all the green would be gone. [[User:Microbe\|Microbe]]