Talk:2416: Trash Compactor Party - Revision history

MeZimm at 16:15, 25 February 2025

2025-02-25T16:15:45Z

Mr. Nobody at 19:35, 14 August 2021

2021-08-14T19:35:16Z

141.101.105.92 at 15:47, 27 January 2021

2021-01-27T15:47:41Z

Ocæon: inconsequential comment

2021-01-27T14:55:51Z

inconsequential comment

141.101.77.102 at 01:37, 27 January 2021

2021-01-27T01:37:08Z

108.162.216.172 at 00:10, 27 January 2021

2021-01-27T00:10:59Z

Bwisey at 19:01, 26 January 2021

2021-01-26T19:01:28Z

108.162.245.164 at 18:24, 26 January 2021

2021-01-26T18:24:18Z

162.158.203.25: link

2021-01-26T17:24:43Z

link

162.158.203.25: Similarity to 1187 Aspect Ratio

2021-01-26T17:24:04Z

Similarity to 1187 Aspect Ratio

@@ Line 20: / Line 20: @@
 The first thing I thought of was Fermat's Room the 2007 film. [[User:Bwisey|Bwisey]] ([[User talk:Bwisey|talk]]) 19:01, 26 January 2021 (UTC)
-Does the fourth paragraph (beginning "Though a significant proportion of the population seem to have returned to being oblivious to the pandemic...") contribute anything of value to the explanation? It seems to me like blatant editorializing. MeZimm [[Special:Contributions/108.162.216.172|108.162.216.172]] 00:10, 27 January 2021 (UTC)
+Does the fourth paragraph (beginning "Though a significant proportion of the population seem to have returned to being oblivious to the pandemic...") contribute anything of value to the explanation? It seems to me like blatant editorializing.[[User:MeZimm|MeZimm]] ([[User talk:MeZimm|talk]]) 00:10, 27 January 2021 (UTC)
 : Aside from the grammatical to-and-fro that happened (fun to watch), I think it helps set up the "will attend party, but still allergic to nearness" nature of the guests. c.f. that prior comic where the television drama was being compulsively assessed in the light of being contemporary yet had ''no masks or social distancing'', i.e. psychology and situation jar together. It has to be pointed out that these ''weren't'' 'Covidiots' more afraid of the rules than the virus, nor natural asocial agoraphobic hermits who'd never liked attending parties beforehand and wouldn't be there 'now' (with or without crusher-walls). I don't know if I could say that in fewer words than what are there, but it looks like I just did in many more... (Congrats to Randall, BTW, for expressing that sense of peoples' recoiling horror against the enforced nearness of others in a faceless ''stick figure'' pose. That's art, that is.) [[Special:Contributions/141.101.77.102|141.101.77.102]] 01:37, 27 January 2021 (UTC)

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 <!--Please sign your posts with ~~~~ and don't delete this text. New comments should be added at the bottom.-->
 Who invited the dianoga? Oh, it's ok, it's gone now. [[Special:Contributions/141.101.104.177|141.101.104.177]] 01:20, 26 January 2021 (UTC)
 If the characters aren't supposed to die, then could someone please change the incomplete explanation template? Former was supposed to be a reference to no longer socially distancing and no longer alive, but I don't have any other ideas.[[Special:Contributions/162.158.187.79|162.158.187.79]] 02:00, 26 January 2021 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:47, 27 January 2021
Line 22:		Line 22:

	only one of the five attendees will need to duck for them to safely occupy the same 2d space, except for the furniture. i wonder if ponytail is simply weighing up the possibility of an embarrasing situation. still, the furniture bothers me and i would like to see how randall proposes they can resolve that without overcomplicating the picture (remember when there was a debate over ambiguous depth and lines when two were seated on a sideways sofa). i like how megan is cursing the fourth wall. [[User:Ocæon\|ocæon]] ([[User talk:Ocæon\|talk]]) 14:55, 27 January 2021 (UTC)		only one of the five attendees will need to duck for them to safely occupy the same 2d space, except for the furniture. i wonder if ponytail is simply weighing up the possibility of an embarrasing situation. still, the furniture bothers me and i would like to see how randall proposes they can resolve that without overcomplicating the picture (remember when there was a debate over ambiguous depth and lines when two were seated on a sideways sofa). i like how megan is cursing the fourth wall. [[User:Ocæon\|ocæon]] ([[User talk:Ocæon\|talk]]) 14:55, 27 January 2021 (UTC)
		+
		+	The big rewrite to remove 'personal feelings' (?) could at least have made it a snappier explanation, not longer. And while it is a truth that ''this group'' remain reluctant to close up, even after 'it is all over', there are enough current examples of irresponsible behaviour that at least a few-word nod to these lot having obviously been/become used to being sensible/rule-following should have been made. But I don't feel like an edit-war on that matter, so fair enough. [[Special:Contributions/141.101.105.92\|141.101.105.92]] 15:47, 27 January 2021 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:55, 27 January 2021
Line 20:		Line 20:
	Does the fourth paragraph (beginning "Though a significant proportion of the population seem to have returned to being oblivious to the pandemic...") contribute anything of value to the explanation? It seems to me like blatant editorializing. MeZimm [[Special:Contributions/108.162.216.172\|108.162.216.172]] 00:10, 27 January 2021 (UTC)		Does the fourth paragraph (beginning "Though a significant proportion of the population seem to have returned to being oblivious to the pandemic...") contribute anything of value to the explanation? It seems to me like blatant editorializing. MeZimm [[Special:Contributions/108.162.216.172\|108.162.216.172]] 00:10, 27 January 2021 (UTC)
	: Aside from the grammatical to-and-fro that happened (fun to watch), I think it helps set up the "will attend party, but still allergic to nearness" nature of the guests. c.f. that prior comic where the television drama was being compulsively assessed in the light of being contemporary yet had ''no masks or social distancing'', i.e. psychology and situation jar together. It has to be pointed out that these ''weren't'' 'Covidiots' more afraid of the rules than the virus, nor natural asocial agoraphobic hermits who'd never liked attending parties beforehand and wouldn't be there 'now' (with or without crusher-walls). I don't know if I could say that in fewer words than what are there, but it looks like I just did in many more... (Congrats to Randall, BTW, for expressing that sense of peoples' recoiling horror against the enforced nearness of others in a faceless ''stick figure'' pose. That's art, that is.) [[Special:Contributions/141.101.77.102\|141.101.77.102]] 01:37, 27 January 2021 (UTC)		: Aside from the grammatical to-and-fro that happened (fun to watch), I think it helps set up the "will attend party, but still allergic to nearness" nature of the guests. c.f. that prior comic where the television drama was being compulsively assessed in the light of being contemporary yet had ''no masks or social distancing'', i.e. psychology and situation jar together. It has to be pointed out that these ''weren't'' 'Covidiots' more afraid of the rules than the virus, nor natural asocial agoraphobic hermits who'd never liked attending parties beforehand and wouldn't be there 'now' (with or without crusher-walls). I don't know if I could say that in fewer words than what are there, but it looks like I just did in many more... (Congrats to Randall, BTW, for expressing that sense of peoples' recoiling horror against the enforced nearness of others in a faceless ''stick figure'' pose. That's art, that is.) [[Special:Contributions/141.101.77.102\|141.101.77.102]] 01:37, 27 January 2021 (UTC)
		+
		+	only one of the five attendees will need to duck for them to safely occupy the same 2d space, except for the furniture. i wonder if ponytail is simply weighing up the possibility of an embarrasing situation. still, the furniture bothers me and i would like to see how randall proposes they can resolve that without overcomplicating the picture (remember when there was a debate over ambiguous depth and lines when two were seated on a sideways sofa). i like how megan is cursing the fourth wall. [[User:Ocæon\|ocæon]] ([[User talk:Ocæon\|talk]]) 14:55, 27 January 2021 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:37, 27 January 2021
Line 19:		Line 19:

	Does the fourth paragraph (beginning "Though a significant proportion of the population seem to have returned to being oblivious to the pandemic...") contribute anything of value to the explanation? It seems to me like blatant editorializing. MeZimm [[Special:Contributions/108.162.216.172\|108.162.216.172]] 00:10, 27 January 2021 (UTC)		Does the fourth paragraph (beginning "Though a significant proportion of the population seem to have returned to being oblivious to the pandemic...") contribute anything of value to the explanation? It seems to me like blatant editorializing. MeZimm [[Special:Contributions/108.162.216.172\|108.162.216.172]] 00:10, 27 January 2021 (UTC)
		+	: Aside from the grammatical to-and-fro that happened (fun to watch), I think it helps set up the "will attend party, but still allergic to nearness" nature of the guests. c.f. that prior comic where the television drama was being compulsively assessed in the light of being contemporary yet had ''no masks or social distancing'', i.e. psychology and situation jar together. It has to be pointed out that these ''weren't'' 'Covidiots' more afraid of the rules than the virus, nor natural asocial agoraphobic hermits who'd never liked attending parties beforehand and wouldn't be there 'now' (with or without crusher-walls). I don't know if I could say that in fewer words than what are there, but it looks like I just did in many more... (Congrats to Randall, BTW, for expressing that sense of peoples' recoiling horror against the enforced nearness of others in a faceless ''stick figure'' pose. That's art, that is.) [[Special:Contributions/141.101.77.102\|141.101.77.102]] 01:37, 27 January 2021 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:10, 27 January 2021
Line 17:		Line 17:

	The first thing I thought of was Fermat's Room the 2007 film. [[User:Bwisey\|Bwisey]] ([[User talk:Bwisey\|talk]]) 19:01, 26 January 2021 (UTC)		The first thing I thought of was Fermat's Room the 2007 film. [[User:Bwisey\|Bwisey]] ([[User talk:Bwisey\|talk]]) 19:01, 26 January 2021 (UTC)
		+
		+	Does the fourth paragraph (beginning "Though a significant proportion of the population seem to have returned to being oblivious to the pandemic...") contribute anything of value to the explanation? It seems to me like blatant editorializing. MeZimm [[Special:Contributions/108.162.216.172\|108.162.216.172]] 00:10, 27 January 2021 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:01, 26 January 2021
Line 15:		Line 15:

	: To a degree. Most of the similarity arises from the mechanisms on the sides.[[Special:Contributions/108.162.245.164\|108.162.245.164]] 18:24, 26 January 2021 (UTC)		: To a degree. Most of the similarity arises from the mechanisms on the sides.[[Special:Contributions/108.162.245.164\|108.162.245.164]] 18:24, 26 January 2021 (UTC)
		+
		+	The first thing I thought of was Fermat's Room the 2007 film. [[User:Bwisey\|Bwisey]] ([[User talk:Bwisey\|talk]]) 19:01, 26 January 2021 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:24, 26 January 2021
Line 13:		Line 13:

	It's quite similar to [[1187]], isn't it? [[Special:Contributions/162.158.203.25\|162.158.203.25]] 17:24, 26 January 2021 (UTC)		It's quite similar to [[1187]], isn't it? [[Special:Contributions/162.158.203.25\|162.158.203.25]] 17:24, 26 January 2021 (UTC)
		+
		+	: To a degree. Most of the similarity arises from the mechanisms on the sides.[[Special:Contributions/108.162.245.164\|108.162.245.164]] 18:24, 26 January 2021 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:24, 26 January 2021
Line 12:		Line 12:
	TV Tropes is referenced on Explain xkcd anew! [[Special:Contributions/172.69.35.85\|172.69.35.85]] 06:37, 26 January 2021 (UTC)		TV Tropes is referenced on Explain xkcd anew! [[Special:Contributions/172.69.35.85\|172.69.35.85]] 06:37, 26 January 2021 (UTC)

−	It's quite similar to [[1187], isn't it? [[Special:Contributions/162.158.203.25\|162.158.203.25]] 17:24, 26 January 2021 (UTC)	+	It's quite similar to [[1187]], isn't it? [[Special:Contributions/162.158.203.25\|162.158.203.25]] 17:24, 26 January 2021 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:24, 26 January 2021
Line 11:		Line 11:

	TV Tropes is referenced on Explain xkcd anew! [[Special:Contributions/172.69.35.85\|172.69.35.85]] 06:37, 26 January 2021 (UTC)		TV Tropes is referenced on Explain xkcd anew! [[Special:Contributions/172.69.35.85\|172.69.35.85]] 06:37, 26 January 2021 (UTC)
		+
		+	It's quite similar to [[1187], isn't it? [[Special:Contributions/162.158.203.25\|162.158.203.25]] 17:24, 26 January 2021 (UTC)