Talk:2451: AI Methodology - Revision history

172.70.126.2 at 03:43, 1 July 2021

2021-07-01T03:43:00Z

172.69.170.50: Notify of rewrite and ask for comments.

2021-04-21T04:36:28Z

Notify of rewrite and ask for comments.

Hiihaveanaccount at 14:02, 19 April 2021

2021-04-19T14:02:08Z

108.162.241.160 at 09:02, 19 April 2021

2021-04-19T09:02:14Z

Hkmaly at 07:13, 18 April 2021

2021-04-18T07:13:00Z

141.101.98.108: undoing bad pre-post edit...

2021-04-17T21:26:22Z

undoing bad pre-post edit...

141.101.98.16 at 21:22, 17 April 2021

2021-04-17T21:22:00Z

141.101.69.109 at 20:27, 17 April 2021

2021-04-17T20:27:05Z

Barmar at 12:59, 17 April 2021

2021-04-17T12:59:44Z

172.69.35.175 at 12:11, 17 April 2021

2021-04-17T12:11:31Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:43, 1 July 2021
Line 18:		Line 18:

	I have rewritten most of the explanation to better describe AI-related concepts. I would appreciate edits or comments if anything is unclear. I have tried to define all terms, but as I am familiar with them, I may be using jargon too much. [[Special:Contributions/172.69.170.50\|172.69.170.50]] 04:36, 21 April 2021 (UTC)		I have rewritten most of the explanation to better describe AI-related concepts. I would appreciate edits or comments if anything is unclear. I have tried to define all terms, but as I am familiar with them, I may be using jargon too much. [[Special:Contributions/172.69.170.50\|172.69.170.50]] 04:36, 21 April 2021 (UTC)
		+
		+	Am I high or is the graph actually a map of the click and drag comic?

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:36, 21 April 2021
Line 16:		Line 16:

	Methodology and methodology section likely refer to distinct things. Methodology section is part of the research paper, while methodology refers to how the research was actually performed. [[Special:Contributions/108.162.241.160\|108.162.241.160]] 09:02, 19 April 2021 (UTC)		Methodology and methodology section likely refer to distinct things. Methodology section is part of the research paper, while methodology refers to how the research was actually performed. [[Special:Contributions/108.162.241.160\|108.162.241.160]] 09:02, 19 April 2021 (UTC)
		+
		+	I have rewritten most of the explanation to better describe AI-related concepts. I would appreciate edits or comments if anything is unclear. I have tried to define all terms, but as I am familiar with them, I may be using jargon too much. [[Special:Contributions/172.69.170.50\|172.69.170.50]] 04:36, 21 April 2021 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:02, 19 April 2021
Line 9:		Line 9:

	I think it’s interesting that no one has thought to define AI, as if everybody should know what this means! (~~ unsigned by 172.69.35.175 ~~)		I think it’s interesting that no one has thought to define AI, as if everybody should know what this means! (~~ unsigned by 172.69.35.175 ~~)
		+	:Artificial Intelligence. And yes, everyone DOES kind of know what it is [[User:Hiihaveanaccount\|Hiihaveanaccount]] ([[User talk:Hiihaveanaccount\|talk]]) 14:02, 19 April 2021 (UTC)

	I think the first paragraph (“The joke is...”) is not justified. Too many details that cannot be inferred from the comic, even using AI. (~~ unsigned by 141.101.69.109 ~~)		I think the first paragraph (“The joke is...”) is not justified. Too many details that cannot be inferred from the comic, even using AI. (~~ unsigned by 141.101.69.109 ~~)

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:02, 19 April 2021
Line 13:		Line 13:
	:My AI infers that the joke is [https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-42554735 a toaster]... [[Special:Contributions/141.101.98.16\|141.101.98.16]] 21:22, 17 April 2021 (UTC) (PS, what is it with everyone not bothering to sign things?)		:My AI infers that the joke is [https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-42554735 a toaster]... [[Special:Contributions/141.101.98.16\|141.101.98.16]] 21:22, 17 April 2021 (UTC) (PS, what is it with everyone not bothering to sign things?)
	::That article is three years old and it's STILL not most popular print on T-shirts and bumper sticker image? -- [[User:Hkmaly\|Hkmaly]] ([[User talk:Hkmaly\|talk]]) 07:13, 18 April 2021 (UTC)		::That article is three years old and it's STILL not most popular print on T-shirts and bumper sticker image? -- [[User:Hkmaly\|Hkmaly]] ([[User talk:Hkmaly\|talk]]) 07:13, 18 April 2021 (UTC)
		+
		+	Methodology and methodology section likely refer to distinct things. Methodology section is part of the research paper, while methodology refers to how the research was actually performed. [[Special:Contributions/108.162.241.160\|108.162.241.160]] 09:02, 19 April 2021 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 07:13, 18 April 2021
Line 12:		Line 12:
	I think the first paragraph (“The joke is...”) is not justified. Too many details that cannot be inferred from the comic, even using AI. (~~ unsigned by 141.101.69.109 ~~)		I think the first paragraph (“The joke is...”) is not justified. Too many details that cannot be inferred from the comic, even using AI. (~~ unsigned by 141.101.69.109 ~~)
	:My AI infers that the joke is [https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-42554735 a toaster]... [[Special:Contributions/141.101.98.16\|141.101.98.16]] 21:22, 17 April 2021 (UTC) (PS, what is it with everyone not bothering to sign things?)		:My AI infers that the joke is [https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-42554735 a toaster]... [[Special:Contributions/141.101.98.16\|141.101.98.16]] 21:22, 17 April 2021 (UTC) (PS, what is it with everyone not bothering to sign things?)
		+	::That article is three years old and it's STILL not most popular print on T-shirts and bumper sticker image? -- [[User:Hkmaly\|Hkmaly]] ([[User talk:Hkmaly\|talk]]) 07:13, 18 April 2021 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:26, 17 April 2021
Line 11:		Line 11:

	I think the first paragraph (“The joke is...”) is not justified. Too many details that cannot be inferred from the comic, even using AI. (~~ unsigned by 141.101.69.109 ~~)		I think the first paragraph (“The joke is...”) is not justified. Too many details that cannot be inferred from the comic, even using AI. (~~ unsigned by 141.101.69.109 ~~)
−	:My AI ~~identifies~~ infers that the joke is [https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-42554735 a toaster]... [[Special:Contributions/141.101.98.16\|141.101.98.16]] 21:22, 17 April 2021 (UTC) (PS, what is it with everyone not bothering to sign things?)	+	:My AI infers that the joke is [https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-42554735 a toaster]... [[Special:Contributions/141.101.98.16\|141.101.98.16]] 21:22, 17 April 2021 (UTC) (PS, what is it with everyone not bothering to sign things?)

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 <!--Please sign your posts with ~~~~ and don't delete this text. New comments should be added at the bottom.-->
-I checked with severαl bots, & replαcing eαch instαnce of "a" with "α" in α mid-length pαssαge of text seems enough to sαtisfy most unicity requirements.
+I checked with severαl bots, & replαcing eαch instαnce of "a" with "α" in α mid-length pαssαge of text seems enough to sαtisfy most unicity requirements. (~~ unsigned by ProphetZarquon ~~)
 * But then the spell-checkers (AI-based or not) start screaming about the unknown words. [[User:Nutster|Nutster]] ([[User talk:Nutster|talk]]) 09:14, 17 April 2021 (UTC)
@@ Line 6: / Line 6: @@
 :I think it's a spoof of the recent reports of things like facial recognition systems that have trouble with minorities. Or Google/YouTube recommendation algorithms that show the user sites that confirm their biases. [[User:Barmar|Barmar]] ([[User talk:Barmar|talk]]) 12:59, 17 April 2021 (UTC)
-i think the methodology ai is dodgy and has inbuilt preferences to pick other ai options over others, regardless of their validity. kinda like ai nepotism
+i think the methodology ai is dodgy and has inbuilt preferences to pick other ai options over others, regardless of their validity. kinda like ai nepotism (~~ unsigned by 141.101.98.174 ~~)
-I think it’s interesting that no one has thought to define AI, as if everybody should know what this means!
+I think it’s interesting that no one has thought to define AI, as if everybody should know what this means! (~~ unsigned by 172.69.35.175 ~~)
-I think the first paragraph (“The joke is...”) is not justified. Too many details that cannot be inferred from the comic, even using AI.
+I think the first paragraph (“The joke is...”) is not justified. Too many details that cannot be inferred from the comic, even using AI. (~~ unsigned by 141.101.69.109 ~~)

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:27, 17 April 2021
Line 9:		Line 9:

	I think it’s interesting that no one has thought to define AI, as if everybody should know what this means!		I think it’s interesting that no one has thought to define AI, as if everybody should know what this means!
		+
		+	I think the first paragraph (“The joke is...”) is not justified. Too many details that cannot be inferred from the comic, even using AI.

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:11, 17 April 2021
Line 6:		Line 6:

	i think the methodology ai is dodgy and has inbuilt preferences to pick other ai options over others, regardless of their validity. kinda like ai nepotism		i think the methodology ai is dodgy and has inbuilt preferences to pick other ai options over others, regardless of their validity. kinda like ai nepotism
		+
		+	I think it’s interesting that no one has thought to define AI, as if everybody should know what this means!