Talk:2504: Fissile Raspberry Isotopes - Revision history

172.69.42.15: Added comment on Touch-Me-Nots

2023-01-04T23:40:45Z

Added comment on Touch-Me-Nots

WileyC at 02:02, 9 September 2021

2021-09-09T02:02:29Z

172.69.55.131 at 11:59, 27 August 2021

2021-08-27T11:59:33Z

Asimong at 17:33, 23 August 2021

2021-08-23T17:33:41Z

162.158.50.8 at 17:32, 23 August 2021

2021-08-23T17:32:30Z

162.158.89.10 at 13:33, 21 August 2021

2021-08-21T13:33:15Z

Baffo32 at 00:16, 21 August 2021

2021-08-21T00:16:30Z

Baffo32 at 00:13, 21 August 2021

2021-08-21T00:13:23Z

162.158.90.253 at 21:42, 20 August 2021

2021-08-20T21:42:34Z

162.158.111.170: I hate on-screen keyboards. No innate haptic feedback to help indicate key-misses. Anyway, hopefully all corrected, or enough of them.

2021-08-20T17:34:04Z

I hate on-screen keyboards. No innate haptic feedback to help indicate key-misses. Anyway, hopefully all corrected, or enough of them.

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:40, 4 January 2023
Line 36:		Line 36:

	I thought it was a miss that it wasn't pie masons (as in mason jars... frequently used for preserving fruit). [[User:WileyC\|WileyC]] ([[User talk:WileyC\|talk]]) 02:02, 9 September 2021 (UTC)		I thought it was a miss that it wasn't pie masons (as in mason jars... frequently used for preserving fruit). [[User:WileyC\|WileyC]] ([[User talk:WileyC\|talk]]) 02:02, 9 September 2021 (UTC)
		+
		+	Touch-me-nots actually kind of behave this way: the seed pods swell with water until they pop, flinging seeds everywhere. See, e.g. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oJ5dQ_Pdfac

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:02, 9 September 2021
Line 34:		Line 34:
	Can't believe that the [https://www.raspberrypi.org/ Raspberry Pi] is not implicated here, but personally I can't see the connection. Can someone? [[User:Asimong\|Asimong]] ([[User talk:Asimong\|talk]]) 17:33, 23 August 2021 (UTC)		Can't believe that the [https://www.raspberrypi.org/ Raspberry Pi] is not implicated here, but personally I can't see the connection. Can someone? [[User:Asimong\|Asimong]] ([[User talk:Asimong\|talk]]) 17:33, 23 August 2021 (UTC)
	:It's talked about above. Maybe there wasn't room for a microcontroller-based allusion (after helping sparking the base word-association that begot the comic's final target), or maybe it's totally coincidental to the original inspiration and had not enough commonality to suggest bringing it into the fray. I can't believe it did not cross Randall's mind somewhere along the way, though. Perhaps its lack of intricate tying-in is more indicative of it being actively ''not'' shoehorned in. (Every idea I have about how to cameo the Pi seems rather clunky to me, at best. But then I'm not a polymathic parodist of long standing...) [[Special:Contributions/172.69.55.131\|172.69.55.131]] 11:59, 27 August 2021 (UTC)		:It's talked about above. Maybe there wasn't room for a microcontroller-based allusion (after helping sparking the base word-association that begot the comic's final target), or maybe it's totally coincidental to the original inspiration and had not enough commonality to suggest bringing it into the fray. I can't believe it did not cross Randall's mind somewhere along the way, though. Perhaps its lack of intricate tying-in is more indicative of it being actively ''not'' shoehorned in. (Every idea I have about how to cameo the Pi seems rather clunky to me, at best. But then I'm not a polymathic parodist of long standing...) [[Special:Contributions/172.69.55.131\|172.69.55.131]] 11:59, 27 August 2021 (UTC)
		+
		+	I thought it was a miss that it wasn't pie masons (as in mason jars... frequently used for preserving fruit). [[User:WileyC\|WileyC]] ([[User talk:WileyC\|talk]]) 02:02, 9 September 2021 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:59, 27 August 2021
Line 33:		Line 33:

	Can't believe that the [https://www.raspberrypi.org/ Raspberry Pi] is not implicated here, but personally I can't see the connection. Can someone? [[User:Asimong\|Asimong]] ([[User talk:Asimong\|talk]]) 17:33, 23 August 2021 (UTC)		Can't believe that the [https://www.raspberrypi.org/ Raspberry Pi] is not implicated here, but personally I can't see the connection. Can someone? [[User:Asimong\|Asimong]] ([[User talk:Asimong\|talk]]) 17:33, 23 August 2021 (UTC)
		+	:It's talked about above. Maybe there wasn't room for a microcontroller-based allusion (after helping sparking the base word-association that begot the comic's final target), or maybe it's totally coincidental to the original inspiration and had not enough commonality to suggest bringing it into the fray. I can't believe it did not cross Randall's mind somewhere along the way, though. Perhaps its lack of intricate tying-in is more indicative of it being actively ''not'' shoehorned in. (Every idea I have about how to cameo the Pi seems rather clunky to me, at best. But then I'm not a polymathic parodist of long standing...) [[Special:Contributions/172.69.55.131\|172.69.55.131]] 11:59, 27 August 2021 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:33, 23 August 2021
Line 32:		Line 32:
	Mesons consist of quark and antiquark. Quark is a dairy product used as ingredient in baking pies. [[Special:Contributions/162.158.89.10\|162.158.89.10]] 13:33, 21 August 2021 (UTC)		Mesons consist of quark and antiquark. Quark is a dairy product used as ingredient in baking pies. [[Special:Contributions/162.158.89.10\|162.158.89.10]] 13:33, 21 August 2021 (UTC)

−	Can't believe that the [https://www.raspberrypi.org/ Raspberry Pi] is not implicated here, but personally I can't see the connection. Can someone? [[~~Special~~:~~Contributions/162.158.50.8~~\|~~162.158.50.8~~]] 17:32, 23 August 2021 (UTC)	+	Can't believe that the [https://www.raspberrypi.org/ Raspberry Pi] is not implicated here, but personally I can't see the connection. Can someone? [[User:Asimong\|Asimong]] ([[User talk:Asimong\|talk]]) 17:33, 23 August 2021 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:32, 23 August 2021
Line 31:		Line 31:
	The title text states blackberries, not raspberries.		The title text states blackberries, not raspberries.
	Mesons consist of quark and antiquark. Quark is a dairy product used as ingredient in baking pies. [[Special:Contributions/162.158.89.10\|162.158.89.10]] 13:33, 21 August 2021 (UTC)		Mesons consist of quark and antiquark. Quark is a dairy product used as ingredient in baking pies. [[Special:Contributions/162.158.89.10\|162.158.89.10]] 13:33, 21 August 2021 (UTC)
		+
		+	Can't believe that the [https://www.raspberrypi.org/ Raspberry Pi] is not implicated here, but personally I can't see the connection. Can someone? [[Special:Contributions/162.158.50.8\|162.158.50.8]] 17:32, 23 August 2021 (UTC)

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
-<!--Please sign your posts with ~~~~ and don't delete this text. New comments should be added at the bottom.-->
 This joke is like a visual pun, a raspberry fruit looks sorta like a nuclear model, and so it behaves the same (ie can go supercritical). [[Special:Contributions/172.69.35.72|172.69.35.72]] 20:38, 18 August 2021 (UTC)
 :Along with an actual pun: pi in "pi meson" sounds like pie in "raspberry pie". [[User:Barmar|Barmar]] ([[User talk:Barmar|talk]]) 20:43, 18 August 2021 (UTC)
@@ Line 26: / Line 27: @@
 I feel like there might be more to this joke. When I'm plucking raspberries in the forest, they break in half pretty often, causing me to get juice on my hands, which is pretty annoying.[[Special:Contributions/162.158.90.253|162.158.90.253]] 21:42, 20 August 2021 (UTC)
 :And then that juice on your hands breaks another raspberry in half, because you are worried less about keeping your hands clean ... and then you hand your juicy raspberries to a friend, getting their hand juicy from your hand ... The NRC arrive and it's just red, everywhere. [[User:Baffo32|Baffo32]] ([[User talk:Baffo32|talk]]) 00:16, 21 August 2021 (UTC)

@@ Line 23: / Line 23: @@
 ::::::By dint of the humour-decay so described, results in one permanent example fit to tickle the funnybone of all but the most curmudgeonly every 2, 3 or 4 comics, on a rolling average. In every case being absolutely obvious to pretty much everyone that it is there for amusement value (especially amidst dry, technical detail) even to those only just arrived upon these particular digital shores...
 ::::::IMO, of course, having no authority or desire for authority here. [[Special:Contributions/141.101.77.69|141.101.77.69]] 17:30, 20 August 2021 (UTC)
 I feel like there might be more to this joke. When I'm plucking raspberries in the forest, they break in half pretty often, causing me to get juice on my hands, which is pretty annoying.[[Special:Contributions/162.158.90.253|162.158.90.253]] 21:42, 20 August 2021 (UTC)
-:::::: I'm pretty sure part of the joke here is the edit war it can stimulate, not sure.  But clearly it would be overdoing it to formalize including one every single explanation.  [[User:Baffo32|Baffo32]] ([[User talk:Baffo32|talk]]) 00:13, 21 August 2021 (UTC)
+:And then that juice on your hands breaks another raspberry in half, because you are worried less about keeping your hands clean ... and then you hand your juicy raspberries to a friend, getting their hand juicy from your hand ... The NRC arrive and it's just red, everywhere. [[User:Baffo32|Baffo32]] ([[User talk:Baffo32|talk]]) 00:16, 21 August 2021 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:42, 20 August 2021
Line 23:		Line 23:
	::::::By dint of the humour-decay so described, results in one permanent example fit to tickle the funnybone of all but the most curmudgeonly every 2, 3 or 4 comics, on a rolling average. In every case being absolutely obvious to pretty much everyone that it is there for amusement value (especially amidst dry, technical detail) even to those only just arrived upon these particular digital shores...		::::::By dint of the humour-decay so described, results in one permanent example fit to tickle the funnybone of all but the most curmudgeonly every 2, 3 or 4 comics, on a rolling average. In every case being absolutely obvious to pretty much everyone that it is there for amusement value (especially amidst dry, technical detail) even to those only just arrived upon these particular digital shores...
	::::::IMO, of course, having no authority or desire for authority here. [[Special:Contributions/141.101.77.69\|141.101.77.69]] 17:30, 20 August 2021 (UTC)		::::::IMO, of course, having no authority or desire for authority here. [[Special:Contributions/141.101.77.69\|141.101.77.69]] 17:30, 20 August 2021 (UTC)
		+	I feel like there might be more to this joke. When I'm plucking raspberries in the forest, they break in half pretty often, causing me to get juice on my hands, which is pretty annoying.
		+	[[Special:Contributions/162.158.90.253\|162.158.90.253]] 21:42, 20 August 2021 (UTC)

@@ Line 19: / Line 19: @@
 :::It's a reference to [https://explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php/285:_Wikipedian_Protester 'xkcd 285'], a long running joke in the xkcd community, What If? and Randal's other books, and the xkcd merch shop {{unsigned ip|172.69.42.63}}
 ::::And severely overused. Imho it should only be used when we are actually looking for a citation for someting stated without proof in the explanation. So I generally feel free to remove them as I did here. --[[User:Kynde|Kynde]] ([[User talk:Kynde|talk]]) 15:54, 20 August 2021 (UTC)
-:::::I agree there ''can'' (and has been) overuse, but by your criteria there would be absolutely no 285-bwckrefetencing at all. In use on The Original Wiki and all the rest there other cite-markers requesting an edit to clarify, expand, use better units, add comic issue and page, etc, and th9se exist (or can be made to exist) here.
+:::::I agree there ''can'' (and has been) overuse, but by your criteria there would be absolutely no 285-backrefetencing at all. In use on The Original Wiki and all the rest there other cite-markers requesting an edit to clarify, expand, use better units, add comic issue and page, etc, and th9se exist (or can be made to exist) here.
-::::::I wouldn't suggest every clause of every sentence of every paragraph of every comic's explanation be in-joked, but (with exceptions on a very few rare occasions that will doubtlessly be edited down by a future editor like you, or me, anyway) I see no harm in so labell8ng up to ''one'' axiomatic statement this way per article (the absolutely most obvious and inarguable and, by editors' aggregate concensus without resorting to an edit-war, humorous-to-so-label statement).
+::::::I wouldn't suggest every clause of every sentence of every paragraph of every comic's explanation be in-joked, but (with exceptions on a very few rare occasions that will doubtlessly be edited down by a future editor like you, or me, anyway) I see no harm in so labelling up to ''one'' axiomatic statement this way per article (the absolutely most obvious and inarguable and, by editors' aggregate concensus without resorting to an edit-war, humorous-to-so-label statement).
-::::::By dint of the humour-decay so described, results in one permanent example fit 5o tickle the funnybone of all but the most curmudgeonly every 2, 3 or 4 comics, on a rolling average. In every case being absolutely obvious to pretty much everyone 5hat it is there for amusement valu (especially amidst dry, technical detail) even to those only jus5 wrrived upon these particular digital shores...
+::::::By dint of the humour-decay so described, results in one permanent example fit to tickle the funnybone of all but the most curmudgeonly every 2, 3 or 4 comics, on a rolling average. In every case being absolutely obvious to pretty much everyone that it is there for amusement value (especially amidst dry, technical detail) even to those only just arrived upon these particular digital shores...
 ::::::IMO, of course, having no authority or desire for authority here. [[Special:Contributions/141.101.77.69|141.101.77.69]] 17:30, 20 August 2021 (UTC)