Talk:2561: Moonfall - Revision history

172.70.162.77 at 18:48, 28 February 2022

2022-02-28T18:48:54Z

Dansiman at 22:33, 21 January 2022

2022-01-21T22:33:20Z

108.162.249.15 at 20:33, 11 January 2022

2022-01-11T20:33:31Z

These Are Not The Comments You Are Looking For at 02:50, 2 January 2022

2022-01-02T02:50:52Z

108.162.249.15: Point out that a point is pointlessly irrelevant

2022-01-01T02:25:17Z

Point out that a point is pointlessly irrelevant

GreatWyrmGold at 20:41, 31 December 2021

2021-12-31T20:41:37Z

172.70.82.53 at 17:00, 31 December 2021

2021-12-31T17:00:47Z

172.70.86.22 at 15:33, 30 December 2021

2021-12-30T15:33:21Z

Seebert at 14:59, 30 December 2021

2021-12-30T14:59:24Z

Seebert at 14:58, 30 December 2021

2021-12-30T14:58:07Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:48, 28 February 2022
Line 31:		Line 31:

	:Fixed! [[User:Dansiman\|Dansiman]] ([[User talk:Dansiman\|talk]]) 22:33, 21 January 2022 (UTC)		:Fixed! [[User:Dansiman\|Dansiman]] ([[User talk:Dansiman\|talk]]) 22:33, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
		+
		+	Call me someone living under a rock (hopefully not a Moon-sized one, descending at great speed) but, in seeing the edit to rephrase the release as a thing now happened, I just realised that I've seen practicaly no advertising ''or'' reviews for this film. This comic is basically the entirety of the information I have seen about this film even existing, except for a half-glimpsed trailer back in January when I glanced up from the book I was reading, during a TV ad-break, and realised that the current fuss (between the usual commercial nonsense) was a typically abbreviated trailer, and almost immediately ended, never to be seen again. I presume it is (or was) on at the local multiscreen, but they no longer post their weekly schedules up like they used to, so even when I pass the entrance I remain uninformed. (Is it as good as we expected? Or 'as good'?) [[Special:Contributions/172.70.162.77\|172.70.162.77]] 18:48, 28 February 2022 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:33, 21 January 2022
Line 29:		Line 29:

	Why does the mass of the moon have two leading 0, but is in scientific notation. Shouldn't it just be ^22 instead of ^24		Why does the mass of the moon have two leading 0, but is in scientific notation. Shouldn't it just be ^22 instead of ^24
		+
		+	:Fixed! [[User:Dansiman\|Dansiman]] ([[User talk:Dansiman\|talk]]) 22:33, 21 January 2022 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:33, 11 January 2022
Line 27:		Line 27:

	Moonfall sounds like it should be the sequel to {{w\|Skyfall}}. [[User:These Are Not The Comments You Are Looking For\|These Are Not The Comments You Are Looking For]] ([[User talk:These Are Not The Comments You Are Looking For\|talk]]) 02:50, 2 January 2022 (UTC)		Moonfall sounds like it should be the sequel to {{w\|Skyfall}}. [[User:These Are Not The Comments You Are Looking For\|These Are Not The Comments You Are Looking For]] ([[User talk:These Are Not The Comments You Are Looking For\|talk]]) 02:50, 2 January 2022 (UTC)
		+
		+	Why does the mass of the moon have two leading 0, but is in scientific notation. Shouldn't it just be ^22 instead of ^24

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:50, 2 January 2022
Line 25:		Line 25:

	For some reason 2562 is not on here; i thought a bot automatically added new xkcd posts but for some reason 2562 wasn't added and its been a few hours [[Special:Contributions/172.70.82.53\|172.70.82.53]] 17:00, 31 December 2021 (UTC)		For some reason 2562 is not on here; i thought a bot automatically added new xkcd posts but for some reason 2562 wasn't added and its been a few hours [[Special:Contributions/172.70.82.53\|172.70.82.53]] 17:00, 31 December 2021 (UTC)
		+
		+	Moonfall sounds like it should be the sequel to {{w\|Skyfall}}. [[User:These Are Not The Comments You Are Looking For\|These Are Not The Comments You Are Looking For]] ([[User talk:These Are Not The Comments You Are Looking For\|talk]]) 02:50, 2 January 2022 (UTC)

@@ Line 13: / Line 13: @@
 :: I believe it's a quote. So the grammatical errors are on the movie producers. ---- {{unsigned ip|172.68.110.133}}
 ::: On Wikipedia, now linked from the Moonfall link, it states two astronauts and a conspiracy person --[[User:Kynde|Kynde]] ([[User talk:Kynde|talk]]) 12:42, 30 December 2021 (UTC)
 To be fair, Shakespeare not writing Shakespeare is NOT the idea of Emmerich, and the idea was so seriously discussed that it has a Wiki page: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shakespeare_authorship_question [[Special:Contributions/141.101.77.64|141.101.77.64]] 09:34, 30 December 2021 (UTC)

@@ Line 16: / Line 16: @@
 To be fair, Shakespeare not writing Shakespeare is NOT the idea of Emmerich, and the idea was so seriously discussed that it has a Wiki page: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shakespeare_authorship_question [[Special:Contributions/141.101.77.64|141.101.77.64]] 09:34, 30 December 2021 (UTC)
 :Agree I have deleted this and just mentioned three of his most catastrophic films. --[[User:Kynde|Kynde]] ([[User talk:Kynde|talk]]) 12:42, 30 December 2021 (UTC)
 I think Ronald is an amateur :-D. The Danish director Lars von Trier managed, in ''{{w|Melancholia (2011 film)|Melancholia}}'' to let the Earth hit into a planet large enough that Earth could have been it's moon. Of course his budget was rater smaller so the explosions are not so cool. But the damage was total obliteration, and no rescue team, hence the title matches the film --[[User:Kynde|Kynde]] ([[User talk:Kynde|talk]]) 12:42, 30 December 2021 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:00, 31 December 2021
Line 21:		Line 21:

	This sounds a bit like the plot of [[wikipedia:Majora's Mask\|Majora's Mask]]. --[[User:WhiteDragon\|WhiteDragon]] ([[User talk:WhiteDragon\|talk]]) 13:50, 30 December 2021 (UTC)		This sounds a bit like the plot of [[wikipedia:Majora's Mask\|Majora's Mask]]. --[[User:WhiteDragon\|WhiteDragon]] ([[User talk:WhiteDragon\|talk]]) 13:50, 30 December 2021 (UTC)
		+
		+	For some reason 2562 is not on here; i thought a bot automatically added new xkcd posts but for some reason 2562 wasn't added and its been a few hours [[Special:Contributions/172.70.82.53\|172.70.82.53]] 17:00, 31 December 2021 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:33, 30 December 2021
Line 18:		Line 18:

	I think Ronald is an amateur :-D. The Danish director Lars von Trier managed, in ''{{w\|Melancholia (2011 film)\|Melancholia}}'' to let the Earth hit into a planet large enough that Earth could have been it's moon. Of course his budget was rater smaller so the explosions are not so cool. But the damage was total obliteration, and no rescue team, hence the title matches the film --[[User:Kynde\|Kynde]] ([[User talk:Kynde\|talk]]) 12:42, 30 December 2021 (UTC)		I think Ronald is an amateur :-D. The Danish director Lars von Trier managed, in ''{{w\|Melancholia (2011 film)\|Melancholia}}'' to let the Earth hit into a planet large enough that Earth could have been it's moon. Of course his budget was rater smaller so the explosions are not so cool. But the damage was total obliteration, and no rescue team, hence the title matches the film --[[User:Kynde\|Kynde]] ([[User talk:Kynde\|talk]]) 12:42, 30 December 2021 (UTC)
		+	:There was also {{w\|When Worlds Collide (1951 film)}} (imagine what Ronald/Bay would have done, with the full power DreamWorks rendering, or similar). Though (as everyone knows) when the Moon leaves orbit it {{w\|Space: 1999\|goes ''away'' from the Earth}} at a strangely plot-friendly velocity that lets them both pass many extrastellar worlds (roughly one a week!) and yet still visit and return from them a convenient number of times while they are somehow still in range of their limited spacecraft... [[Special:Contributions/172.70.86.22\|172.70.86.22]] 15:33, 30 December 2021 (UTC)

	This sounds a bit like the plot of [[wikipedia:Majora's Mask\|Majora's Mask]]. --[[User:WhiteDragon\|WhiteDragon]] ([[User talk:WhiteDragon\|talk]]) 13:50, 30 December 2021 (UTC)		This sounds a bit like the plot of [[wikipedia:Majora's Mask\|Majora's Mask]]. --[[User:WhiteDragon\|WhiteDragon]] ([[User talk:WhiteDragon\|talk]]) 13:50, 30 December 2021 (UTC)

@@ Line 3: / Line 3: @@
 :What is "it"? [[User:Barmar|Barmar]] ([[User talk:Barmar|talk]]) 21:58, 29 December 2021 (UTC)
 ::Explosions, probably. -- [[User:Hkmaly|Hkmaly]] ([[User talk:Hkmaly|talk]]) 23:15, 29 December 2021 (UTC)
-:: Yes, explosions (alt text) [[User:Seebert|Seebert]] ([[User talk:Seebert|talk]]) 14:58, 30 December 2021 (UTC)
+:: Yes, 'novel ideas ABOUT cool explosions' (alt text) [[User:Seebert|Seebert]] ([[User talk:Seebert|talk]]) 14:58, 30 December 2021 (UTC)
 This synopsis makes me eager to never ever see this tripe, which the comic failed to achieve. Thank you, explainxkcd, for saving me time and money.[[Special:Contributions/162.158.107.18|162.158.107.18]] 20:03, 29 December 2021 (UTC)