Talk:2569: Hypothesis Generation - Revision history

162.158.202.177: Undo revision 225235 by 172.70.110.147 (talk) spam

2022-01-21T20:37:58Z

Undo revision 225235 by 172.70.110.147 (talk) spam

172.70.110.147: /* Re: explainxkcd.com is currently ranking for ~ 18922 keywords */ new section

2022-01-21T19:33:23Z

‎Re: explainxkcd.com is currently ranking for ~ 18922 keywords: new section

172.70.134.71 at 20:20, 20 January 2022

2022-01-20T20:20:16Z

Opalmagpie: Undo revision 224980 by 108.162.219.117 (talk). Removing some spam

2022-01-20T05:56:59Z

Undo revision 224980 by 108.162.219.117 (talk). Removing some spam

108.162.219.117: /* Your site – more leads? */ new section

2022-01-20T05:37:16Z

‎Your site – more leads?: new section

172.70.90.173 at 16:04, 19 January 2022

2022-01-19T16:04:29Z

162.158.203.36: Popper

2022-01-19T05:54:58Z

Popper

172.70.86.68 at 21:30, 18 January 2022

2022-01-18T21:30:28Z

D5xtgr at 19:30, 18 January 2022

2022-01-18T19:30:49Z

172.68.226.223 at 19:10, 18 January 2022

2022-01-18T19:10:46Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:37, 21 January 2022
Line 50:		Line 50:
	"How do you think..." triggers me. If I thought I might know how to do it, I wouldn't have asked in the first place. --[[Special:Contributions/172.70.90.173\|172.70.90.173]] 16:04, 19 January 2022 (UTC)		"How do you think..." triggers me. If I thought I might know how to do it, I wouldn't have asked in the first place. --[[Special:Contributions/172.70.90.173\|172.70.90.173]] 16:04, 19 January 2022 (UTC)
	: Many would ask if they have an idea but are unsure, in which case stating ones idea and picking it apart is more valuable than being handed the final answer. Perhaps you aren't such a person and would only ask when completely truly stuck; in that case I'd be triggered too. [[Special:Contributions/172.70.134.71\|172.70.134.71]] 20:20, 20 January 2022 (UTC)		: Many would ask if they have an idea but are unsure, in which case stating ones idea and picking it apart is more valuable than being handed the final answer. Perhaps you aren't such a person and would only ask when completely truly stuck; in that case I'd be triggered too. [[Special:Contributions/172.70.134.71\|172.70.134.71]] 20:20, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
−
−	~~== Re: explainxkcd.com is currently ranking for ~ 18922 keywords ==~~
−
−	~~Did you know that explainxkcd.com is currently ranking for ~ 18922 keywords?~~
−
−	~~Out of these 18922 very few keywords are ranking on page 1 of search engines.~~
−
−	~~Here is 4 point action plan for explainxkcd.com:~~
−
−	~~1. We are missing lot of keywords so we will need to prepare comprehensive keywords list that is targeted and highly relevant~~
−
−	2. Your website needs to be optimized for search engines so that search engines can read your website accurately. I have analyzed your site in-depth and I would like to walk you through detailed website audit report.
−
−	~~3. At the time of review, explainxkcd.com is linked to 707865. However, many of these links are spammy. We will need to build high quality backlinks on variety of high authority domains.~~
−
−	4. I could find find some facebook footprint for explainxkcd.com (Facebook comments = unknown, Facebook Shares = unknown, Facebook reactions = unknown). However, I could not find much activity on other social networking sites. Along with robust social media marketing strategy, I propose to run email newsletter campaign along with periodic blog posting on your website.
−
−
−	When you work with us, we will provide an entire team of four experts (SEO strategist, web developer, content writer, and link building strategist) to ensure that your site will rank for several keywords.
−
−	~~Let me know a good time and phone number to reach you and I will give you a call to discuss our plan of action.~~
−
−	~~Marissa~~

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:33, 21 January 2022
Line 50:		Line 50:
	"How do you think..." triggers me. If I thought I might know how to do it, I wouldn't have asked in the first place. --[[Special:Contributions/172.70.90.173\|172.70.90.173]] 16:04, 19 January 2022 (UTC)		"How do you think..." triggers me. If I thought I might know how to do it, I wouldn't have asked in the first place. --[[Special:Contributions/172.70.90.173\|172.70.90.173]] 16:04, 19 January 2022 (UTC)
	: Many would ask if they have an idea but are unsure, in which case stating ones idea and picking it apart is more valuable than being handed the final answer. Perhaps you aren't such a person and would only ask when completely truly stuck; in that case I'd be triggered too. [[Special:Contributions/172.70.134.71\|172.70.134.71]] 20:20, 20 January 2022 (UTC)		: Many would ask if they have an idea but are unsure, in which case stating ones idea and picking it apart is more valuable than being handed the final answer. Perhaps you aren't such a person and would only ask when completely truly stuck; in that case I'd be triggered too. [[Special:Contributions/172.70.134.71\|172.70.134.71]] 20:20, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
		+
		+	== Re: explainxkcd.com is currently ranking for ~ 18922 keywords ==
		+
		+	Did you know that explainxkcd.com is currently ranking for ~ 18922 keywords?
		+
		+	Out of these 18922 very few keywords are ranking on page 1 of search engines.
		+
		+	Here is 4 point action plan for explainxkcd.com:
		+
		+	1. We are missing lot of keywords so we will need to prepare comprehensive keywords list that is targeted and highly relevant
		+
		+	2. Your website needs to be optimized for search engines so that search engines can read your website accurately. I have analyzed your site in-depth and I would like to walk you through detailed website audit report.
		+
		+	3. At the time of review, explainxkcd.com is linked to 707865. However, many of these links are spammy. We will need to build high quality backlinks on variety of high authority domains.
		+
		+	4. I could find find some facebook footprint for explainxkcd.com (Facebook comments = unknown, Facebook Shares = unknown, Facebook reactions = unknown). However, I could not find much activity on other social networking sites. Along with robust social media marketing strategy, I propose to run email newsletter campaign along with periodic blog posting on your website.
		+
		+
		+	When you work with us, we will provide an entire team of four experts (SEO strategist, web developer, content writer, and link building strategist) to ensure that your site will rank for several keywords.
		+
		+	Let me know a good time and phone number to reach you and I will give you a call to discuss our plan of action.
		+
		+	Marissa

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:20, 20 January 2022
Line 49:		Line 49:

	"How do you think..." triggers me. If I thought I might know how to do it, I wouldn't have asked in the first place. --[[Special:Contributions/172.70.90.173\|172.70.90.173]] 16:04, 19 January 2022 (UTC)		"How do you think..." triggers me. If I thought I might know how to do it, I wouldn't have asked in the first place. --[[Special:Contributions/172.70.90.173\|172.70.90.173]] 16:04, 19 January 2022 (UTC)
		+	: Many would ask if they have an idea but are unsure, in which case stating ones idea and picking it apart is more valuable than being handed the final answer. Perhaps you aren't such a person and would only ask when completely truly stuck; in that case I'd be triggered too. [[Special:Contributions/172.70.134.71\|172.70.134.71]] 20:20, 20 January 2022 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:56, 20 January 2022
Line 49:		Line 49:

	"How do you think..." triggers me. If I thought I might know how to do it, I wouldn't have asked in the first place. --[[Special:Contributions/172.70.90.173\|172.70.90.173]] 16:04, 19 January 2022 (UTC)		"How do you think..." triggers me. If I thought I might know how to do it, I wouldn't have asked in the first place. --[[Special:Contributions/172.70.90.173\|172.70.90.173]] 16:04, 19 January 2022 (UTC)
−
−	~~== Your site – more leads? ==~~
−
−	~~Hey, this is Eric and I ran across explainxkcd.com a few minutes ago.~~
−
−	~~Looks great… but now what?~~
−
−	By that I mean, when someone like me finds your website – either through Search or just bouncing around – what happens next? Do you get a lot of leads from your site, or at least enough to make you happy?
−
−	~~Honestly, most business websites fall a bit short when it comes to generating paying customers. Studies show that 70% of a site’s visitors disappear and are gone forever after just a moment.~~
−
−	~~Here’s an idea…~~
−
−	~~How about making it really EASY for every visitor who shows up to get a personal phone call you as soon as they hit your site…~~
−
−	~~You can –~~
−
−	Talk With Web Visitor is a software widget that’s works on your site, ready to capture any visitor’s Name, Email address and Phone Number. It signals you the moment they let you know they’re interested – so that you can talk to that lead while they’re literally looking over your site.
−
−	~~CLICK HERE http://jumboleadmagnet.com to try out a Live Demo with Talk With Web Visitor now to see exactly how it works.~~
−
−	~~You’ll be amazed - the difference between contacting someone within 5 minutes versus a half-hour or more later could increase your results 100-fold.~~
−
−	~~It gets even better… once you’ve captured their phone number, with our new SMS Text With Lead feature, you can automatically start a text (SMS) conversation.~~
−
−	~~That way, even if you don’t close a deal right away, you can follow up with text messages for new offers, content links, even just “how you doing?” notes to build a relationship.~~
−
−	~~Pretty sweet – AND effective.~~
−
−	~~CLICK HERE http://jumboleadmagnet.com to discover what Talk With Web Visitor can do for your business.~~
−
−	~~You could be converting up to 100X more leads today!~~
−
−	~~Eric~~
−	~~PS: Talk With Web Visitor offers a FREE 14 days trial – and it even includes International Long Distance Calling.~~
−	~~You have customers waiting to talk with you right now… don’t keep them waiting.~~
−	~~CLICK HERE http://jumboleadmagnet.com to try Talk With Web Visitor now.~~
−
−	~~If you'd like to unsubscribe click here http://jumboleadmagnet.com/unsubscribe.aspx?d=explainxkcd.com~~

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:37, 20 January 2022
Line 49:		Line 49:

	"How do you think..." triggers me. If I thought I might know how to do it, I wouldn't have asked in the first place. --[[Special:Contributions/172.70.90.173\|172.70.90.173]] 16:04, 19 January 2022 (UTC)		"How do you think..." triggers me. If I thought I might know how to do it, I wouldn't have asked in the first place. --[[Special:Contributions/172.70.90.173\|172.70.90.173]] 16:04, 19 January 2022 (UTC)
		+
		+	== Your site – more leads? ==
		+
		+	Hey, this is Eric and I ran across explainxkcd.com a few minutes ago.
		+
		+	Looks great… but now what?
		+
		+	By that I mean, when someone like me finds your website – either through Search or just bouncing around – what happens next? Do you get a lot of leads from your site, or at least enough to make you happy?
		+
		+	Honestly, most business websites fall a bit short when it comes to generating paying customers. Studies show that 70% of a site’s visitors disappear and are gone forever after just a moment.
		+
		+	Here’s an idea…
		+
		+	How about making it really EASY for every visitor who shows up to get a personal phone call you as soon as they hit your site…
		+
		+	You can –
		+
		+	Talk With Web Visitor is a software widget that’s works on your site, ready to capture any visitor’s Name, Email address and Phone Number. It signals you the moment they let you know they’re interested – so that you can talk to that lead while they’re literally looking over your site.
		+
		+	CLICK HERE http://jumboleadmagnet.com to try out a Live Demo with Talk With Web Visitor now to see exactly how it works.
		+
		+	You’ll be amazed - the difference between contacting someone within 5 minutes versus a half-hour or more later could increase your results 100-fold.
		+
		+	It gets even better… once you’ve captured their phone number, with our new SMS Text With Lead feature, you can automatically start a text (SMS) conversation.
		+
		+	That way, even if you don’t close a deal right away, you can follow up with text messages for new offers, content links, even just “how you doing?” notes to build a relationship.
		+
		+	Pretty sweet – AND effective.
		+
		+	CLICK HERE http://jumboleadmagnet.com to discover what Talk With Web Visitor can do for your business.
		+
		+	You could be converting up to 100X more leads today!
		+
		+	Eric
		+	PS: Talk With Web Visitor offers a FREE 14 days trial – and it even includes International Long Distance Calling.
		+	You have customers waiting to talk with you right now… don’t keep them waiting.
		+	CLICK HERE http://jumboleadmagnet.com to try Talk With Web Visitor now.
		+
		+	If you'd like to unsubscribe click here http://jumboleadmagnet.com/unsubscribe.aspx?d=explainxkcd.com

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:04, 19 January 2022
Line 47:		Line 47:

	illuminatus [[Special:Contributions/162.158.203.36\|162.158.203.36]] 05:54, 19 January 2022 (UTC)		illuminatus [[Special:Contributions/162.158.203.36\|162.158.203.36]] 05:54, 19 January 2022 (UTC)
		+
		+	"How do you think..." triggers me. If I thought I might know how to do it, I wouldn't have asked in the first place. --[[Special:Contributions/172.70.90.173\|172.70.90.173]] 16:04, 19 January 2022 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:54, 19 January 2022
Line 43:		Line 43:
	* Skim any prior literature on the design to add citations		* Skim any prior literature on the design to add citations
	[[User:D5xtgr\|D5xtgr]] ([[User talk:D5xtgr\|talk]]) 19:30, 18 January 2022 (UTC)		[[User:D5xtgr\|D5xtgr]] ([[User talk:D5xtgr\|talk]]) 19:30, 18 January 2022 (UTC)
		+
		+	This could also be interpreted as making fun of this simplistic (what people sometimes wrongly attribute to Popper) notion, that tweaking a hypothesis to better fit experimental data is inherently bad science, even though that's where a lot of hypotheses come from, that were then later confirmed by other experiments. Thus it seems like scientists have to come up with hypotheses on the spot as shown in the comic, instead of after pouring through mountains of data. Also it seems like it might be a taboo to go into details about "where hypotheses come from" (like it used to with babies).
		+
		+	illuminatus [[Special:Contributions/162.158.203.36\|162.158.203.36]] 05:54, 19 January 2022 (UTC)

@@ Line 17: / Line 17: @@
 I'm too shy to do the edit myself, but shouldn't the explanation mention how the comic is going meta ? Like, Cueball is generating a hypothesis about hypothesis generation! (btw, how would you test that kind of hypothesis?…) --Anonymous reader {{unsigned ip|172.70.86.22}}
 :You are never more anonymous than your IP, so please sign anyway. I think the meta of this is already implicit in the current explanation when it says: "He has made a hypothesis about how to generate a hypothesis. " --[[User:Kynde|Kynde]] ([[User talk:Kynde|talk]]) 16:23, 18 January 2022 (UTC)
-:: "You are never more anonymous than your IP, so please sign anyway." All right, sorry. Let's say I never commented yet, and I don't mean to start doing this regularly (although… we'll see!) (Understand: I don't have an account, and I don't want to register atm.) By the way, the IP signoff seems broken: I have nothing to do with "172.70.86.22", and it's faaaar from where I live, according to GeoIP. Back to my original point, I though it would be better to make an *explicit* reference to the meta level. Since it's an explanation, it ought to be made as clear as can be. But here's why I didn't make the edit myself: I don't usually edit wikis, so I'll trust your better jugement. --Not So Anonymous reader
+:: "You are never more anonymous than your IP, so please sign anyway." All right, sorry. Let's say I never commented yet, and I don't mean to start doing this regularly (although… we'll see!) (Understand: I don't have an account, and I don't want to register atm.) By the way, the IP signoff seems broken: I have nothing to do with "172.70.86.22", and it's faaaar from where I live, according to GeoIP. Back to my original point, I though it would be better to make an *explicit* reference to the meta level. Since it's an explanation, it ought to be made as clear as can be. But here's why I didn't make the edit myself: I don't usually edit wikis, so I'll trust your better jugement. --Not So Anonymous reader {{unsigned ip|172.68.226.223}}
 How science works in primary school:

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:30, 18 January 2022
Line 18:		Line 18:
	:You are never more anonymous than your IP, so please sign anyway. I think the meta of this is already implicit in the current explanation when it says: "He has made a hypothesis about how to generate a hypothesis. " --[[User:Kynde\|Kynde]] ([[User talk:Kynde\|talk]]) 16:23, 18 January 2022 (UTC)		:You are never more anonymous than your IP, so please sign anyway. I think the meta of this is already implicit in the current explanation when it says: "He has made a hypothesis about how to generate a hypothesis. " --[[User:Kynde\|Kynde]] ([[User talk:Kynde\|talk]]) 16:23, 18 January 2022 (UTC)
	:: "You are never more anonymous than your IP, so please sign anyway." All right, sorry. Let's say I never commented yet, and I don't mean to start doing this regularly (although… we'll see!) (Understand: I don't have an account, and I don't want to register atm.) By the way, the IP signoff seems broken: I have nothing to do with "172.70.86.22", and it's faaaar from where I live, according to GeoIP. Back to my original point, I though it would be better to make an explicit reference to the meta level. Since it's an explanation, it ought to be made as clear as can be. But here's why I didn't make the edit myself: I don't usually edit wikis, so I'll trust your better jugement. --Not So Anonymous reader		:: "You are never more anonymous than your IP, so please sign anyway." All right, sorry. Let's say I never commented yet, and I don't mean to start doing this regularly (although… we'll see!) (Understand: I don't have an account, and I don't want to register atm.) By the way, the IP signoff seems broken: I have nothing to do with "172.70.86.22", and it's faaaar from where I live, according to GeoIP. Back to my original point, I though it would be better to make an explicit reference to the meta level. Since it's an explanation, it ought to be made as clear as can be. But here's why I didn't make the edit myself: I don't usually edit wikis, so I'll trust your better jugement. --Not So Anonymous reader
		+
		+	How science works in primary school:
		+	* Consider a question and generate a hypothesis
		+	* Study the literature to understand the problem space
		+	* Design a methodology to test the hypothesis
		+	* Perform the experiment and record the results
		+	* Analyse and interpret your results
		+	* Draw conclusions and write a report
		+	How science works in practice:
		+	* The sponsor comes to you with an invention he wants to sell
		+	* Design a methodology to showcase the invention's advantages
		+	* Run the experiment and hope the undocumented fragile DAQ system works
		+	** Start with the test cases where the invention is expected to perform best
		+	** Scrap the remaining test cases once it falls behind existing tech
		+	* Graph the data and write a paper merely describing what the graphs show
		+	* Skim any prior literature on the design to add citations
		+	[[User:D5xtgr\|D5xtgr]] ([[User talk:D5xtgr\|talk]]) 19:30, 18 January 2022 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:10, 18 January 2022
Line 17:		Line 17:
	I'm too shy to do the edit myself, but shouldn't the explanation mention how the comic is going meta ? Like, Cueball is generating a hypothesis about hypothesis generation! (btw, how would you test that kind of hypothesis?…) --Anonymous reader {{unsigned ip\|172.70.86.22}}		I'm too shy to do the edit myself, but shouldn't the explanation mention how the comic is going meta ? Like, Cueball is generating a hypothesis about hypothesis generation! (btw, how would you test that kind of hypothesis?…) --Anonymous reader {{unsigned ip\|172.70.86.22}}
	:You are never more anonymous than your IP, so please sign anyway. I think the meta of this is already implicit in the current explanation when it says: "He has made a hypothesis about how to generate a hypothesis. " --[[User:Kynde\|Kynde]] ([[User talk:Kynde\|talk]]) 16:23, 18 January 2022 (UTC)		:You are never more anonymous than your IP, so please sign anyway. I think the meta of this is already implicit in the current explanation when it says: "He has made a hypothesis about how to generate a hypothesis. " --[[User:Kynde\|Kynde]] ([[User talk:Kynde\|talk]]) 16:23, 18 January 2022 (UTC)
		+	:: "You are never more anonymous than your IP, so please sign anyway." All right, sorry. Let's say I never commented yet, and I don't mean to start doing this regularly (although… we'll see!) (Understand: I don't have an account, and I don't want to register atm.) By the way, the IP signoff seems broken: I have nothing to do with "172.70.86.22", and it's faaaar from where I live, according to GeoIP. Back to my original point, I though it would be better to make an explicit reference to the meta level. Since it's an explanation, it ought to be made as clear as can be. But here's why I didn't make the edit myself: I don't usually edit wikis, so I'll trust your better jugement. --Not So Anonymous reader