Talk:3034: Features of Adulthood - Revision history

162.158.216.58 at 14:40, 31 March 2025

2025-03-31T14:40:03Z

172.71.241.132 at 14:39, 31 March 2025

2025-03-31T14:39:00Z

Xnerkcd at 13:23, 31 March 2025

2025-03-31T13:23:33Z

Xnerkcd at 13:22, 31 March 2025

2025-03-31T13:22:51Z

Xnerkcd: I was just signing off my previous comment, I forgot to do that, sorryy

2025-03-31T13:21:51Z

I was just signing off my previous comment, I forgot to do that, sorryy

Xnerkcd at 13:14, 31 March 2025

2025-03-31T13:14:06Z

172.71.8.37: asking about incomplete tag

2025-02-26T02:11:11Z

asking about incomplete tag

Apollo11 at 19:33, 13 January 2025

2025-01-13T19:33:36Z

172.70.123.134: asking about the incomplete tag removal

2025-01-13T19:25:34Z

asking about the incomplete tag removal

172.70.85.70 at 10:04, 9 January 2025

2025-01-09T10:04:20Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:40, 31 March 2025
Line 35:		Line 35:

	I've modified the table <i>sliiightly</i>, as I think that the first one, (which fork you're supposed to use for what), has a higher (but not high) "expected frequency rate", as it is not as close to the y-axis border as to the x-axis border.[[User:Xnerkcd\|Xnerkcd]] ([[User talk:Xnerkcd\|talk]]) 13:23, 31 March 2025 (UTC)		I've modified the table <i>sliiightly</i>, as I think that the first one, (which fork you're supposed to use for what), has a higher (but not high) "expected frequency rate", as it is not as close to the y-axis border as to the x-axis border.[[User:Xnerkcd\|Xnerkcd]] ([[User talk:Xnerkcd\|talk]]) 13:23, 31 March 2025 (UTC)
−	:My habit with these kinds of placement-of-labels tables is to consider the exact midpoint of the edges of the label (with or without normalising to 0%..100% or -1..+1, according to best understanding). By this, I'd have maybe have had nothing at all at 0% (or perhaps the leftmost/downmost mid-label point would be, as the rightmost/uppermost is automatically 100%), and perhaps ''both ' a few percentage points higher up in the low figures. But it's a matter of inetpretation. And of nothing with ultimate necessity for exaxtitdre. [[Special:Contributions/172.71.241.132\|172.71.241.132]] 14:39, 31 March 2025 (UTC)	+	:My habit with these kinds of placement-of-labels tables is to consider the exact midpoint of the edges of the label (with or without normalising to 0%..100% or -1..+1, according to best understanding). By this, I'd have maybe have had nothing at all at 0% (or perhaps the leftmost/downmost mid-label point would be, as the rightmost/uppermost is automatically 100%), and perhaps ''both'' a few percentage points higher up in the low figures. But it's a matter of inetpretation. And of nothing with ultimate necessity for exaxtitdre. [[Special:Contributions/172.71.241.132\|172.71.241.132]] 14:39, 31 March 2025 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:39, 31 March 2025
Line 35:		Line 35:

	I've modified the table <i>sliiightly</i>, as I think that the first one, (which fork you're supposed to use for what), has a higher (but not high) "expected frequency rate", as it is not as close to the y-axis border as to the x-axis border.[[User:Xnerkcd\|Xnerkcd]] ([[User talk:Xnerkcd\|talk]]) 13:23, 31 March 2025 (UTC)		I've modified the table <i>sliiightly</i>, as I think that the first one, (which fork you're supposed to use for what), has a higher (but not high) "expected frequency rate", as it is not as close to the y-axis border as to the x-axis border.[[User:Xnerkcd\|Xnerkcd]] ([[User talk:Xnerkcd\|talk]]) 13:23, 31 March 2025 (UTC)
		+	:My habit with these kinds of placement-of-labels tables is to consider the exact midpoint of the edges of the label (with or without normalising to 0%..100% or -1..+1, according to best understanding). By this, I'd have maybe have had nothing at all at 0% (or perhaps the leftmost/downmost mid-label point would be, as the rightmost/uppermost is automatically 100%), and perhaps ''both ' a few percentage points higher up in the low figures. But it's a matter of inetpretation. And of nothing with ultimate necessity for exaxtitdre. [[Special:Contributions/172.71.241.132\|172.71.241.132]] 14:39, 31 March 2025 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:23, 31 March 2025
Line 34:		Line 34:
	Why was the incomplete tag removed? Customer service and Shopping still have empty "Notes". [[Special:Contributions/172.71.8.37\|172.71.8.37]] 02:11, 26 February 2025 (UTC)		Why was the incomplete tag removed? Customer service and Shopping still have empty "Notes". [[Special:Contributions/172.71.8.37\|172.71.8.37]] 02:11, 26 February 2025 (UTC)

−	I've modified the table <i>sliiightly</i>, as I think that the first one, (which fork you're supposed to use for what), has a higher (but not high) "expected frequency rate", as it is not as close to the y-axis border as to the x-axis border.	+	I've modified the table <i>sliiightly</i>, as I think that the first one, (which fork you're supposed to use for what), has a higher (but not high) "expected frequency rate", as it is not as close to the y-axis border as to the x-axis border.[[User:Xnerkcd\|Xnerkcd]] ([[User talk:Xnerkcd\|talk]]) 13:23, 31 March 2025 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:22, 31 March 2025
Line 34:		Line 34:
	Why was the incomplete tag removed? Customer service and Shopping still have empty "Notes". [[Special:Contributions/172.71.8.37\|172.71.8.37]] 02:11, 26 February 2025 (UTC)		Why was the incomplete tag removed? Customer service and Shopping still have empty "Notes". [[Special:Contributions/172.71.8.37\|172.71.8.37]] 02:11, 26 February 2025 (UTC)

−	I've modified the table <i>sliiightly</i>, as I think that the first one, (which fork you're supposed to use for what), has a higher (but not high) "expected frequency rate", as it is not as close to the y-axis border as to the x-axis border. ~~[[User:Xnerkcd\|Xnerkcd]] ([[User talk:Xnerkcd\|talk]]) 13:21, 31 March 2025 (UTC) xnerkcd, 14:20, 31 March 2025 (UTC)~~	+	I've modified the table <i>sliiightly</i>, as I think that the first one, (which fork you're supposed to use for what), has a higher (but not high) "expected frequency rate", as it is not as close to the y-axis border as to the x-axis border.

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:21, 31 March 2025
Line 34:		Line 34:
	Why was the incomplete tag removed? Customer service and Shopping still have empty "Notes". [[Special:Contributions/172.71.8.37\|172.71.8.37]] 02:11, 26 February 2025 (UTC)		Why was the incomplete tag removed? Customer service and Shopping still have empty "Notes". [[Special:Contributions/172.71.8.37\|172.71.8.37]] 02:11, 26 February 2025 (UTC)

−	I've modified the table <i>sliiightly</i>, as I think that the first one, (which fork you're supposed to use for what), has a higher (but not high) "expected frequency rate", as it is not as close to the y-axis border as to the x-axis border.	+	I've modified the table <i>sliiightly</i>, as I think that the first one, (which fork you're supposed to use for what), has a higher (but not high) "expected frequency rate", as it is not as close to the y-axis border as to the x-axis border. [[User:Xnerkcd\|Xnerkcd]] ([[User talk:Xnerkcd\|talk]]) 13:21, 31 March 2025 (UTC) xnerkcd, 14:20, 31 March 2025 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:14, 31 March 2025
Line 33:		Line 33:

	Why was the incomplete tag removed? Customer service and Shopping still have empty "Notes". [[Special:Contributions/172.71.8.37\|172.71.8.37]] 02:11, 26 February 2025 (UTC)		Why was the incomplete tag removed? Customer service and Shopping still have empty "Notes". [[Special:Contributions/172.71.8.37\|172.71.8.37]] 02:11, 26 February 2025 (UTC)
		+
		+	I've modified the table <i>sliiightly</i>, as I think that the first one, (which fork you're supposed to use for what), has a higher (but not high) "expected frequency rate", as it is not as close to the y-axis border as to the x-axis border.

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:11, 26 February 2025
Line 31:		Line 31:
	Why was the incomplete tag removed? Cooking, Laundry, Customer service and Shopping still have empty "Notes". [[Special:Contributions/172.70.123.134\|172.70.123.134]] 19:25, 13 January 2025 (UTC)		Why was the incomplete tag removed? Cooking, Laundry, Customer service and Shopping still have empty "Notes". [[Special:Contributions/172.70.123.134\|172.70.123.134]] 19:25, 13 January 2025 (UTC)
	:Fixed it. [[User:Apollo11\|Apollo11]] ([[User talk:Apollo11\|talk]]) 19:33, 13 January 2025 (UTC)		:Fixed it. [[User:Apollo11\|Apollo11]] ([[User talk:Apollo11\|talk]]) 19:33, 13 January 2025 (UTC)
		+
		+	Why was the incomplete tag removed? Customer service and Shopping still have empty "Notes". [[Special:Contributions/172.71.8.37\|172.71.8.37]] 02:11, 26 February 2025 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:33, 13 January 2025
Line 30:		Line 30:

	Why was the incomplete tag removed? Cooking, Laundry, Customer service and Shopping still have empty "Notes". [[Special:Contributions/172.70.123.134\|172.70.123.134]] 19:25, 13 January 2025 (UTC)		Why was the incomplete tag removed? Cooking, Laundry, Customer service and Shopping still have empty "Notes". [[Special:Contributions/172.70.123.134\|172.70.123.134]] 19:25, 13 January 2025 (UTC)
		+	:Fixed it. [[User:Apollo11\|Apollo11]] ([[User talk:Apollo11\|talk]]) 19:33, 13 January 2025 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:25, 13 January 2025
Line 28:		Line 28:
	Should we include "Cluedo", because it is almost always referred to solely as "Clue" in America [[User:Firestar233\|guess who]] ([[User talk:Firestar233\|if you desire conversing]] \| [[Special:Contributions/Firestar233\|what i have done]]) 04:02, 9 January 2025 (UTC)		Should we include "Cluedo", because it is almost always referred to solely as "Clue" in America [[User:Firestar233\|guess who]] ([[User talk:Firestar233\|if you desire conversing]] \| [[Special:Contributions/Firestar233\|what i have done]]) 04:02, 9 January 2025 (UTC)
	:In the UK, you'll never hear it called "Clue". So much so that {{w\|Clue (film)}} needs to be explained as based on the boardgame of the different original name. You'd also rarely hear of "checkers", you might even more think of "{{w\|Chequers}}" if you heard it, or just the check-pattern in general. Possibly the most troublesome one is the {{w\|Pachisi}}-derived game, because of its {{w\|Ludo#Variants\|many different names}}. Might even simpler just to remove those from the list, if you didn't want to admit to there being common (''more'' common?) non-US names. [[Special:Contributions/172.69.43.243\|172.69.43.243]] 10:02, 9 January 2025 (UTC)		:In the UK, you'll never hear it called "Clue". So much so that {{w\|Clue (film)}} needs to be explained as based on the boardgame of the different original name. You'd also rarely hear of "checkers", you might even more think of "{{w\|Chequers}}" if you heard it, or just the check-pattern in general. Possibly the most troublesome one is the {{w\|Pachisi}}-derived game, because of its {{w\|Ludo#Variants\|many different names}}. Might even simpler just to remove those from the list, if you didn't want to admit to there being common (''more'' common?) non-US names. [[Special:Contributions/172.69.43.243\|172.69.43.243]] 10:02, 9 January 2025 (UTC)
		+
		+	Why was the incomplete tag removed? Cooking, Laundry, Customer service and Shopping still have empty "Notes". [[Special:Contributions/172.70.123.134\|172.70.123.134]] 19:25, 13 January 2025 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:04, 9 January 2025
Line 27:		Line 27:

	Should we include "Cluedo", because it is almost always referred to solely as "Clue" in America [[User:Firestar233\|guess who]] ([[User talk:Firestar233\|if you desire conversing]] \| [[Special:Contributions/Firestar233\|what i have done]]) 04:02, 9 January 2025 (UTC)		Should we include "Cluedo", because it is almost always referred to solely as "Clue" in America [[User:Firestar233\|guess who]] ([[User talk:Firestar233\|if you desire conversing]] \| [[Special:Contributions/Firestar233\|what i have done]]) 04:02, 9 January 2025 (UTC)
−	In the UK, you'll never hear it called "Clue". So much so that {{w\|Clue (film)}} needs to be explained as based on the boardgame of the different original name. You'd also rarely hear of "checkers", you might even more think of "{{w\|Chequers}}" if you heard it, or just the check-pattern in general. Possibly the most troublesome one is the {{w\|Pachisi}}-derived game, because of its {{w\|Ludo#Variants\|many different names}}. Might even simpler just to remove those from the list, if you didn't want to admit to there being common (''more'' common?) non-US names. [[Special:Contributions/172.69.43.243\|172.69.43.243]] 10:02, 9 January 2025 (UTC)	+	:In the UK, you'll never hear it called "Clue". So much so that {{w\|Clue (film)}} needs to be explained as based on the boardgame of the different original name. You'd also rarely hear of "checkers", you might even more think of "{{w\|Chequers}}" if you heard it, or just the check-pattern in general. Possibly the most troublesome one is the {{w\|Pachisi}}-derived game, because of its {{w\|Ludo#Variants\|many different names}}. Might even simpler just to remove those from the list, if you didn't want to admit to there being common (''more'' common?) non-US names. [[Special:Contributions/172.69.43.243\|172.69.43.243]] 10:02, 9 January 2025 (UTC)