Talk:3143: Question Mark - Revision history

Lordpishky: Dan Baird ref.

2026-01-20T00:36:17Z

Dan Baird ref.

2001:4C4E:1C11:B800:34F9:178:1B57:97B3: Judgement period

2025-12-30T08:21:24Z

Judgement period

Jerodast: Charlie's Angels wooo

2025-09-21T08:26:50Z

Charlie's Angels wooo

2A02:2455:1960:4000:151C:FD75:4E37:3F6D at 08:03, 19 September 2025

2025-09-19T08:03:12Z

BunsenH at 03:42, 19 September 2025

2025-09-19T03:42:36Z

185.219.141.117 at 02:43, 19 September 2025

2025-09-19T02:43:42Z

86.8.84.104 at 00:40, 19 September 2025

2025-09-19T00:40:01Z

47.145.254.54: cat

2025-09-18T22:45:07Z

cat

BunsenH at 22:37, 18 September 2025

2025-09-18T22:37:20Z

Yorkshire Pudding at 17:00, 18 September 2025

2025-09-18T17:00:20Z

@@ Line 36: / Line 36: @@
 All this discussion about verbal punctuation, and no mention of Victor Borge?  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NPc0aijY2o4 [[Special:Contributions/185.219.141.117|185.219.141.117]] 02:43, 19 September 2025 (UTC)
 :I added a link to one of those clips fairly early on, but it got deleted.  That might have been because I tried to incorporate the weird sounds in the write-up.  I put it back, minus the weird sounds. [[User:BunsenH|BunsenH]] ([[User talk:BunsenH|talk]]) 03:42, 19 September 2025 (UTC)
 The gag with the read-alound punctuation was also used about 40 years ago in a sketch in the German Fastnacht classic "Mainz bleibt Mainz" show. (Warning: Anyone commenting about German humor will get their flipperwald gersputet.) [[Special:Contributions/2A02:2455:1960:4000:151C:FD75:4E37:3F6D|2A02:2455:1960:4000:151C:FD75:4E37:3F6D]] 08:03, 19 September 2025 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:21, 30 December 2025
Line 40:		Line 40:

	Perhaps there should be more on the selection of ''Charlie's Angels: Full Throttle'' as the example of taste for the semi-punchline. I, like Hairy, would put it among the greatest films of all time, but Cueball seems to disagree, and I suspect other jokes in the history of the internet may have referred to it with the same sentiment... [[User:Jerodast\|- jerodast]] ([[User talk:Jerodast\|talk]]) 08:26, 21 September 2025 (UTC)		Perhaps there should be more on the selection of ''Charlie's Angels: Full Throttle'' as the example of taste for the semi-punchline. I, like Hairy, would put it among the greatest films of all time, but Cueball seems to disagree, and I suspect other jokes in the history of the internet may have referred to it with the same sentiment... [[User:Jerodast\|- jerodast]] ([[User talk:Jerodast\|talk]]) 08:26, 21 September 2025 (UTC)
		+	*May All Time Question Mark be the author(s) of the film?
		+	*Judgement period sounds like a time during which one judges (e. g. as part of a jury), or an interpretation of Judgement Day where it is not necessarily 1 day (86,400 or 86,401 seconds).
		+	[[Special:Contributions/2001:4C4E:1C11:B800:34F9:178:1B57:97B3\|2001:4C4E:1C11:B800:34F9:178:1B57:97B3]] 08:21, 30 December 2025 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:26, 21 September 2025
Line 38:		Line 38:

	The gag with the read-alound punctuation was also used about 40 years ago in a sketch in the German Fastnacht classic "Mainz bleibt Mainz" show. (Warning: Anyone commenting about German humor will get their flipperwald gersputet.) [[Special:Contributions/2A02:2455:1960:4000:151C:FD75:4E37:3F6D\|2A02:2455:1960:4000:151C:FD75:4E37:3F6D]] 08:03, 19 September 2025 (UTC)		The gag with the read-alound punctuation was also used about 40 years ago in a sketch in the German Fastnacht classic "Mainz bleibt Mainz" show. (Warning: Anyone commenting about German humor will get their flipperwald gersputet.) [[Special:Contributions/2A02:2455:1960:4000:151C:FD75:4E37:3F6D\|2A02:2455:1960:4000:151C:FD75:4E37:3F6D]] 08:03, 19 September 2025 (UTC)
		+
		+	Perhaps there should be more on the selection of ''Charlie's Angels: Full Throttle'' as the example of taste for the semi-punchline. I, like Hairy, would put it among the greatest films of all time, but Cueball seems to disagree, and I suspect other jokes in the history of the internet may have referred to it with the same sentiment... [[User:Jerodast\|- jerodast]] ([[User talk:Jerodast\|talk]]) 08:26, 21 September 2025 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:03, 19 September 2025
Line 36:		Line 36:
	All this discussion about verbal punctuation, and no mention of Victor Borge? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NPc0aijY2o4 [[Special:Contributions/185.219.141.117\|185.219.141.117]] 02:43, 19 September 2025 (UTC)		All this discussion about verbal punctuation, and no mention of Victor Borge? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NPc0aijY2o4 [[Special:Contributions/185.219.141.117\|185.219.141.117]] 02:43, 19 September 2025 (UTC)
	:I added a link to one of those clips fairly early on, but it got deleted. That might have been because I tried to incorporate the weird sounds in the write-up. I put it back, minus the weird sounds. [[User:BunsenH\|BunsenH]] ([[User talk:BunsenH\|talk]]) 03:42, 19 September 2025 (UTC)		:I added a link to one of those clips fairly early on, but it got deleted. That might have been because I tried to incorporate the weird sounds in the write-up. I put it back, minus the weird sounds. [[User:BunsenH\|BunsenH]] ([[User talk:BunsenH\|talk]]) 03:42, 19 September 2025 (UTC)
		+
		+	The gag with the read-alound punctuation was also used about 40 years ago in a sketch in the German Fastnacht classic "Mainz bleibt Mainz" show. (Warning: Anyone commenting about German humor will get their flipperwald gersputet.) [[Special:Contributions/2A02:2455:1960:4000:151C:FD75:4E37:3F6D\|2A02:2455:1960:4000:151C:FD75:4E37:3F6D]] 08:03, 19 September 2025 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:42, 19 September 2025
Line 35:		Line 35:

	All this discussion about verbal punctuation, and no mention of Victor Borge? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NPc0aijY2o4 [[Special:Contributions/185.219.141.117\|185.219.141.117]] 02:43, 19 September 2025 (UTC)		All this discussion about verbal punctuation, and no mention of Victor Borge? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NPc0aijY2o4 [[Special:Contributions/185.219.141.117\|185.219.141.117]] 02:43, 19 September 2025 (UTC)
		+	:I added a link to one of those clips fairly early on, but it got deleted. That might have been because I tried to incorporate the weird sounds in the write-up. I put it back, minus the weird sounds. [[User:BunsenH\|BunsenH]] ([[User talk:BunsenH\|talk]]) 03:42, 19 September 2025 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:43, 19 September 2025
Line 33:		Line 33:

	Can anyone analyse the spacing between words in the main comic? Is there unusual spacing in Cueball's speech or the caption, compared with Hairy's sentence? [[Special:Contributions/86.8.84.104\|86.8.84.104]] 00:40, 19 September 2025 (UTC)		Can anyone analyse the spacing between words in the main comic? Is there unusual spacing in Cueball's speech or the caption, compared with Hairy's sentence? [[Special:Contributions/86.8.84.104\|86.8.84.104]] 00:40, 19 September 2025 (UTC)
		+
		+	All this discussion about verbal punctuation, and no mention of Victor Borge? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NPc0aijY2o4 [[Special:Contributions/185.219.141.117\|185.219.141.117]] 02:43, 19 September 2025 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:40, 19 September 2025
Line 31:		Line 31:

	Interesting reaction on Randall's (Cueball's) part. When people do that, it makes ''me'' want to poke them in the eye. [[User:Yorkshire Pudding\|Yorkshire Pudding]] ([[User talk:Yorkshire Pudding\|talk]]) 17:00, 18 September 2025 (UTC)		Interesting reaction on Randall's (Cueball's) part. When people do that, it makes ''me'' want to poke them in the eye. [[User:Yorkshire Pudding\|Yorkshire Pudding]] ([[User talk:Yorkshire Pudding\|talk]]) 17:00, 18 September 2025 (UTC)
		+
		+	Can anyone analyse the spacing between words in the main comic? Is there unusual spacing in Cueball's speech or the caption, compared with Hairy's sentence? [[Special:Contributions/86.8.84.104\|86.8.84.104]] 00:40, 19 September 2025 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:45, 18 September 2025
Line 16:		Line 16:

	... This is a thing people do? Glad to be unfamiliar. [[Special:Contributions/52.213.77.206\|52.213.77.206]] 07:27, 18 September 2025 (UTC)		... This is a thing people do? Glad to be unfamiliar. [[Special:Contributions/52.213.77.206\|52.213.77.206]] 07:27, 18 September 2025 (UTC)
		+	:I did this just yesterday; a cat was laying on my hands, and I could type "query" but not shift-questionmark. [[Special:Contributions/47.145.254.54\|47.145.254.54]] 22:45, 18 September 2025 (UTC)

	This becomes an annoyingly common occurrence if you commonly use speech to text programs. It is not very fun in regular conversation [[Special:Contributions/99.2.109.131\|99.2.109.131]] 12:37, 18 September 2025 (UTC)		This becomes an annoyingly common occurrence if you commonly use speech to text programs. It is not very fun in regular conversation [[Special:Contributions/99.2.109.131\|99.2.109.131]] 12:37, 18 September 2025 (UTC)

@@ Line 27: / Line 27: @@
 :Yeah, this is absolutely not the place for it. --[[User:Mushrooms|Mushrooms]] ([[User talk:Mushrooms|talk]]) 13:00, 18 September 2025 (UTC)
-The italics section is explicitly opened with the word "italics".  Shouldn't it be closed?  Or is that implicit in the paragraph break?  I'm uncertain if the "Period.  Paragraph break." should also be italicized, or if they should be exempt because they're punctuation indicators. [[User:BunsenH|BunsenH]] ([[User talk:BunsenH|talk]]) 16:17, 18 September 2025 (UTC)
+The italics section is explicitly opened with the word "italics".  Shouldn't it be closed?  Or is that implicit in the paragraph break?  I'm uncertain if the "Period.  Paragraph break." should also be italicized, or if they should be exempt because they're punctuation and formatting indicators. [[User:BunsenH|BunsenH]] ([[User talk:BunsenH|talk]]) 16:17, 18 September 2025 (UTC)
 Interesting reaction on Randall's (Cueball's) part. When people do that, it makes ''me'' want to poke them in the eye. [[User:Yorkshire Pudding|Yorkshire Pudding]] ([[User talk:Yorkshire Pudding|talk]]) 17:00, 18 September 2025 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:00, 18 September 2025
Line 28:		Line 28:

	The italics section is explicitly opened with the word "italics". Shouldn't it be closed? Or is that implicit in the paragraph break? I'm uncertain if the "Period. Paragraph break." should also be italicized, or if they should be exempt because they're punctuation indicators. [[User:BunsenH\|BunsenH]] ([[User talk:BunsenH\|talk]]) 16:17, 18 September 2025 (UTC)		The italics section is explicitly opened with the word "italics". Shouldn't it be closed? Or is that implicit in the paragraph break? I'm uncertain if the "Period. Paragraph break." should also be italicized, or if they should be exempt because they're punctuation indicators. [[User:BunsenH\|BunsenH]] ([[User talk:BunsenH\|talk]]) 16:17, 18 September 2025 (UTC)
		+
		+	Interesting reaction on Randall's (Cueball's) part. When people do that, it makes ''me'' want to poke them in the eye. [[User:Yorkshire Pudding\|Yorkshire Pudding]] ([[User talk:Yorkshire Pudding\|talk]]) 17:00, 18 September 2025 (UTC)