Talk:331: Photoshops - Revision history

141.101.99.89: 'unsigned' last two contributions, clarified (in-source) a split contribution, plus minor markup whitespace rejigging

2025-04-25T05:09:35Z

'unsigned' last two contributions, clarified (in-source) a split contribution, plus minor markup whitespace rejigging

172.68.7.207 at 02:13, 25 April 2025

2025-04-25T02:13:01Z

172.68.7.206 at 02:12, 25 April 2025

2025-04-25T02:12:28Z

172.70.230.197: Thoughts on AI

2023-01-30T16:32:22Z

Thoughts on AI

Kazvorpal at 15:42, 9 November 2019

2019-11-09T15:42:59Z

172.68.46.11 at 19:35, 20 December 2016

2016-12-20T19:35:13Z

Brettpeirce at 13:48, 29 May 2014

2014-05-29T13:48:00Z

Davidy22: Try to avoid inserting your comments in the middle of other people's comments.

2014-02-10T00:07:58Z

Try to avoid inserting your comments in the middle of other people's comments.

108.162.218.101 at 00:03, 10 February 2014

2014-02-10T00:03:19Z

108.162.219.223: Created page with "While many alarming or suspiciously interesting pictures (and videos) have later proven to be 'shopped', I believe that Randall is commenting on the abysmal existence of a cer..."

2013-12-17T18:28:51Z

Created page with "While many alarming or suspiciously interesting pictures (and videos) have later proven to be 'shopped', I believe that Randall is commenting on the abysmal existence of a cer..."

New page

While many alarming or suspiciously interesting pictures (and videos) have later proven to be 'shopped', I believe that Randall is commenting on the abysmal existence of a certain kind of person who cries foul on *any* picture that isn't straightforward.

They usually profess to be Photoshop experts and point out various 'defects' in the photo that 'prove' it has been manipulated.

This is just a (hopefully unconscious) attempt to appear more cynical, more intelligent and harder to fool than everybody else who has ignored the glaring evidence.

What makes it simultaneously amusing and annoying is that usually the commenter is patently, completely and obviously wrong - the image has in fact captured a real occurrence.

The original examples that come to mind are the Apollo 11 photographs from the surface of the moon, but the internet abounds with such.

StephenP

[[Special:Contributions/108.162.219.223|108.162.219.223]] 18:28, 17 December 2013 (UTC)

@@ Line 5: / Line 5: @@
 This is just a (hopefully unconscious) attempt to appear more cynical, more intelligent and harder to fool than everybody else who has ignored the glaring evidence.
-What makes it simultaneously amusing and annoying is that usually the commenter is patently, completely and obviously wrong - the image has in fact captured a real occurrence.
+What makes it simultaneously amusing and annoying is that usually the commenter is patently, completely and obviously wrong - the image has in fact captured a real occurrence. <!-- [[Special:Contributions/108.162.219.223|108.162.219.223]] 18:28, 17 December 2013 (UTC) -->
 :Yes, like this pic of me from back then: [[file:kaz-muscles-superhero.jpg|thumb|none]] ...which is clearly, completely natural. —[[User:Kazvorpal|Kazvorpal]] ([[User talk:Kazvorpal|talk]]) 15:42, 9 November 2019 (UTC)
-The original examples that come to mind are the Apollo 11 photographs from the surface of the moon, but the internet abounds with such.
+The original examples that come to mind are the Apollo 11 photographs from the surface of the moon, but the internet abounds with such. -- StephenP [[Special:Contributions/108.162.219.223|108.162.219.223]] 18:28, 17 December 2013 (UTC)
 To be entirely fair, with the advent of 3D printers, it will become possible to "shop" real-life objects. [[Special:Contributions/108.162.218.101|108.162.218.101]] 00:03, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
@@ Line 18: / Line 14: @@
 : This is already done with plastic surgery, although to a more limited degree, of course. All other physical alterations widely available to the public used on existing objects (that come to mind) are for practical means, such as fixing a refrigerator[[Special:Contributions/172.68.46.11|172.68.46.11]] 19:35, 20 December 2016 (UTC)
-Predicting a resurgence of this comic/dynamic with the advent of "looks AI generated". Reminds me a bit of [[1306: Sigil Cycle]] in that there's something of an arms race between awareness of what makes something "look fake" and the fakery technology itself becoming able to fake those details.
+Predicting a resurgence of this comic/dynamic with the advent of "looks AI generated". Reminds me a bit of [[1306: Sigil Cycle]] in that there's something of an arms race between awareness of what makes something "look fake" and the fakery technology itself becoming able to fake those details. {{unsigned ip|172.70.230.197|16:32, 30 January 2023}}
+:Huh. Meant to say that myself, but it seems someone did it first. {{unsigned ip|172.68.7.206|02:12, 25 April 2025}}

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:13, 25 April 2025
Line 19:		Line 19:

	Predicting a resurgence of this comic/dynamic with the advent of "looks AI generated". Reminds me a bit of [[1306: Sigil Cycle]] in that there's something of an arms race between awareness of what makes something "look fake" and the fakery technology itself becoming able to fake those details.		Predicting a resurgence of this comic/dynamic with the advent of "looks AI generated". Reminds me a bit of [[1306: Sigil Cycle]] in that there's something of an arms race between awareness of what makes something "look fake" and the fakery technology itself becoming able to fake those details.
		+
	Huh. Meant to say that myself, but it seems someone did it first.		Huh. Meant to say that myself, but it seems someone did it first.

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:12, 25 April 2025
Line 19:		Line 19:

	Predicting a resurgence of this comic/dynamic with the advent of "looks AI generated". Reminds me a bit of [[1306: Sigil Cycle]] in that there's something of an arms race between awareness of what makes something "look fake" and the fakery technology itself becoming able to fake those details.		Predicting a resurgence of this comic/dynamic with the advent of "looks AI generated". Reminds me a bit of [[1306: Sigil Cycle]] in that there's something of an arms race between awareness of what makes something "look fake" and the fakery technology itself becoming able to fake those details.
		+	Huh. Meant to say that myself, but it seems someone did it first.

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:32, 30 January 2023
Line 17:		Line 17:
	: I'll just leave this here: https://www.indiegogo.com/projects/new-matter-mod-t-3d-printing-for-everyone [[User:Brettpeirce\|Brettpeirce]] ([[User talk:Brettpeirce\|talk]]) 13:48, 29 May 2014 (UTC)		: I'll just leave this here: https://www.indiegogo.com/projects/new-matter-mod-t-3d-printing-for-everyone [[User:Brettpeirce\|Brettpeirce]] ([[User talk:Brettpeirce\|talk]]) 13:48, 29 May 2014 (UTC)
	: This is already done with plastic surgery, although to a more limited degree, of course. All other physical alterations widely available to the public used on existing objects (that come to mind) are for practical means, such as fixing a refrigerator[[Special:Contributions/172.68.46.11\|172.68.46.11]] 19:35, 20 December 2016 (UTC)		: This is already done with plastic surgery, although to a more limited degree, of course. All other physical alterations widely available to the public used on existing objects (that come to mind) are for practical means, such as fixing a refrigerator[[Special:Contributions/172.68.46.11\|172.68.46.11]] 19:35, 20 December 2016 (UTC)
		+
		+	Predicting a resurgence of this comic/dynamic with the advent of "looks AI generated". Reminds me a bit of [[1306: Sigil Cycle]] in that there's something of an arms race between awareness of what makes something "look fake" and the fakery technology itself becoming able to fake those details.

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:42, 9 November 2019
Line 6:		Line 6:

	What makes it simultaneously amusing and annoying is that usually the commenter is patently, completely and obviously wrong - the image has in fact captured a real occurrence.		What makes it simultaneously amusing and annoying is that usually the commenter is patently, completely and obviously wrong - the image has in fact captured a real occurrence.
		+	:Yes, like this pic of me from back then: [[file:kaz-muscles-superhero.jpg\|thumb\|none]] ...which is clearly, completely natural. —[[User:Kazvorpal\|Kazvorpal]] ([[User talk:Kazvorpal\|talk]]) 15:42, 9 November 2019 (UTC)

	The original examples that come to mind are the Apollo 11 photographs from the surface of the moon, but the internet abounds with such.		The original examples that come to mind are the Apollo 11 photographs from the surface of the moon, but the internet abounds with such.

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:35, 20 December 2016
Line 15:		Line 15:
	To be entirely fair, with the advent of 3D printers, it will become possible to "shop" real-life objects. [[Special:Contributions/108.162.218.101\|108.162.218.101]] 00:03, 10 February 2014 (UTC)		To be entirely fair, with the advent of 3D printers, it will become possible to "shop" real-life objects. [[Special:Contributions/108.162.218.101\|108.162.218.101]] 00:03, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
	: I'll just leave this here: https://www.indiegogo.com/projects/new-matter-mod-t-3d-printing-for-everyone [[User:Brettpeirce\|Brettpeirce]] ([[User talk:Brettpeirce\|talk]]) 13:48, 29 May 2014 (UTC)		: I'll just leave this here: https://www.indiegogo.com/projects/new-matter-mod-t-3d-printing-for-everyone [[User:Brettpeirce\|Brettpeirce]] ([[User talk:Brettpeirce\|talk]]) 13:48, 29 May 2014 (UTC)
		+	: This is already done with plastic surgery, although to a more limited degree, of course. All other physical alterations widely available to the public used on existing objects (that come to mind) are for practical means, such as fixing a refrigerator[[Special:Contributions/172.68.46.11\|172.68.46.11]] 19:35, 20 December 2016 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:48, 29 May 2014
Line 14:		Line 14:

	To be entirely fair, with the advent of 3D printers, it will become possible to "shop" real-life objects. [[Special:Contributions/108.162.218.101\|108.162.218.101]] 00:03, 10 February 2014 (UTC)		To be entirely fair, with the advent of 3D printers, it will become possible to "shop" real-life objects. [[Special:Contributions/108.162.218.101\|108.162.218.101]] 00:03, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
		+	: I'll just leave this here: https://www.indiegogo.com/projects/new-matter-mod-t-3d-printing-for-everyone [[User:Brettpeirce\|Brettpeirce]] ([[User talk:Brettpeirce\|talk]]) 13:48, 29 May 2014 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:07, 10 February 2014
Line 10:		Line 10:

	StephenP		StephenP
		+
		+	[[Special:Contributions/108.162.219.223\|108.162.219.223]] 18:28, 17 December 2013 (UTC)

	To be entirely fair, with the advent of 3D printers, it will become possible to "shop" real-life objects. [[Special:Contributions/108.162.218.101\|108.162.218.101]] 00:03, 10 February 2014 (UTC)		To be entirely fair, with the advent of 3D printers, it will become possible to "shop" real-life objects. [[Special:Contributions/108.162.218.101\|108.162.218.101]] 00:03, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
−
−	~~[[Special:Contributions/108.162.219.223\|108.162.219.223]] 18:28, 17 December 2013 (UTC)~~

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:03, 10 February 2014
Line 10:		Line 10:

	StephenP		StephenP
		+
		+	To be entirely fair, with the advent of 3D printers, it will become possible to "shop" real-life objects. [[Special:Contributions/108.162.218.101\|108.162.218.101]] 00:03, 10 February 2014 (UTC)

	[[Special:Contributions/108.162.219.223\|108.162.219.223]] 18:28, 17 December 2013 (UTC)		[[Special:Contributions/108.162.219.223\|108.162.219.223]] 18:28, 17 December 2013 (UTC)