Talk:566: Matrix Revisited - Revision history

42.book.addict at 16:42, 5 November 2024

2024-11-05T16:42:10Z

2019-12-11T07:10:20Z

2019-12-10T23:07:44Z

2019-04-23T12:55:14Z

2016-05-27T00:05:00Z

TvTropes vs AllTheTropes comment

2016-05-26T22:13:16Z

2016-04-09T20:47:27Z

Comment

2016-01-29T03:25:10Z

2016-01-29T03:24:59Z

2016-01-28T16:39:41Z

@@ Line 9: / Line 9: @@
 I wonder if the sequel bit implies of how the entire movie is supposed to make you just accept things as they are no matter how messed up, and people voluntarily ignore the existence of the sequels, which is the exact opposite of the philosophy that the movie encourages.  [[User: AndyZ|AndyZ]]
 :Actually the Matrix was all about remaking the originals.
-:Something Holywoodland does every 5 or 10 years. They can even slip history 80 to 120 degrees west if they think the audience is really stupid.
+:Something Holywoodland does every 5 or 10 years. They can even slip history 80 to 120 degrees west if they think the audience is really stupid. [[User:Weatherlawyer| I used Google News BEFORE it was clickbait]] ([[User talk:Weatherlawyer|talk]]) 15:05, 30 January 2015 (UTC)
 Can someone explain panel #16?  What exactly is happening offstage here? [[Special:Contributions/108.162.221.93|108.162.221.93]] 23:04, 21 June 2015 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 07:10, 11 December 2019
Line 27:		Line 27:

	Why is the paragraph about 1978: Congressional Testimony included in this explanation. It does not seem to be relevant. [[Special:Contributions/108.162.212.161\|108.162.212.161]] 23:07, 10 December 2019 (UTC)		Why is the paragraph about 1978: Congressional Testimony included in this explanation. It does not seem to be relevant. [[Special:Contributions/108.162.212.161\|108.162.212.161]] 23:07, 10 December 2019 (UTC)
		+	:It is a quite weak link, I agree. I personally would put it into trivia, and also do a link of the comics the other way round. [[1978]] doesn't mention this one at all. --[[User:Lupo\|Lupo]] ([[User talk:Lupo\|talk]]) 07:10, 11 December 2019 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:07, 10 December 2019
Line 25:		Line 25:

	So the 20 years just passed. Seems a little bit less futuristic now, but still awesome. --[[User:Lupo\|Lupo]] ([[User talk:Lupo\|talk]]) 12:55, 23 April 2019 (UTC)		So the 20 years just passed. Seems a little bit less futuristic now, but still awesome. --[[User:Lupo\|Lupo]] ([[User talk:Lupo\|talk]]) 12:55, 23 April 2019 (UTC)
		+
		+	Why is the paragraph about 1978: Congressional Testimony included in this explanation. It does not seem to be relevant. [[Special:Contributions/108.162.212.161\|108.162.212.161]] 23:07, 10 December 2019 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:55, 23 April 2019
Line 23:		Line 23:

	Was there a decision concerning TvTropes vs AllTheTropes? I remember that there was a discussion of which one should be used [[Special:Contributions/173.245.54.77\|173.245.54.77]] 00:05, 27 May 2016 (UTC)		Was there a decision concerning TvTropes vs AllTheTropes? I remember that there was a discussion of which one should be used [[Special:Contributions/173.245.54.77\|173.245.54.77]] 00:05, 27 May 2016 (UTC)
		+
		+	So the 20 years just passed. Seems a little bit less futuristic now, but still awesome. --[[User:Lupo\|Lupo]] ([[User talk:Lupo\|talk]]) 12:55, 23 April 2019 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:05, 27 May 2016
Line 21:		Line 21:
	Pink powder? I thought red and blue make purple! (It does look purple to me)[[Special:Contributions/173.245.54.20\|173.245.54.20]] 19:38, 28 December 2015 (UTC)		Pink powder? I thought red and blue make purple! (It does look purple to me)[[Special:Contributions/173.245.54.20\|173.245.54.20]] 19:38, 28 December 2015 (UTC)
	:Looks like magenta to me, which is the result of full red and full blue in the RGB color space.[[Special:Contributions/162.158.72.89\|162.158.72.89]] 22:13, 26 May 2016 (UTC)		:Looks like magenta to me, which is the result of full red and full blue in the RGB color space.[[Special:Contributions/162.158.72.89\|162.158.72.89]] 22:13, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
		+
		+	Was there a decision concerning TvTropes vs AllTheTropes? I remember that there was a discussion of which one should be used [[Special:Contributions/173.245.54.77\|173.245.54.77]] 00:05, 27 May 2016 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:13, 26 May 2016
Line 20:		Line 20:

	Pink powder? I thought red and blue make purple! (It does look purple to me)[[Special:Contributions/173.245.54.20\|173.245.54.20]] 19:38, 28 December 2015 (UTC)		Pink powder? I thought red and blue make purple! (It does look purple to me)[[Special:Contributions/173.245.54.20\|173.245.54.20]] 19:38, 28 December 2015 (UTC)
		+	:Looks like magenta to me, which is the result of full red and full blue in the RGB color space.[[Special:Contributions/162.158.72.89\|162.158.72.89]] 22:13, 26 May 2016 (UTC)

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 In panel #9, the characters are upside-down and the colors are inverted. Films are produced on negatives, which invert the colors, and are threaded through the projector upside-down (the lens turns the image right-side-up again when projected). This could mean that, instead of merely being in a "non-existent dimension," the characters have gone WAY out of the Matrix and now see themselves to be what they truly are: images on film. (If this was Randall's intention, he might have made it more clear by including the sprocket holes.) [[User:Shanek|Shanek]] ([[User talk:Shanek|talk]]) 12:08, 2 May 2013 (UTC)
 :Regardless of the lack of sprocket holes, I think this is an excellent insight and I will add it to the explanation. [[Special:Contributions/108.162.219.223|108.162.219.223]] 00:41, 11 January 2014 (UTC)
 Panels 12-13 could also suggest that Neo can't comply with the "please remove any metallic items" instruction because he has metal balls. [[User:Saibot84|Saibot84]] ([[User talk:Saibot84|talk]]) 08:35, 5 May 2013 (UTC)

@@ Line 15: / Line 15: @@
 [[Special:Contributions/108.162.250.162|108.162.250.162]] 06:51, 10 August 2015 (UTC)
-Since I don't know how to add wikipedia links, could someone link to the wiki page on exhibitionism for that 'flashing' part? I feel like it should be added. {{unsigned ip|Prongs95}}
+Since I don't know how to add wikipedia links, could someone link to the wiki page on exhibitionism for that 'flashing' part? I feel like it should be added. {{unsigned|Prongs95}}
 Pink powder? I thought red and blue make purple! (It does look purple to me)[[Special:Contributions/173.245.54.20|173.245.54.20]] 19:38, 28 December 2015 (UTC)