Talk:810: Constructive - Revision history

82.132.239.140 at 13:11, 4 December 2025

2025-12-04T13:11:00Z

2A02:C7C:6D8A:6800:FC7A:E6B7:62FA:8BB7: The Turing test is a solved problem :(

2025-12-04T10:38:51Z

The Turing test is a solved problem :(

ISaveXKCDpapers: added comment

2025-04-26T02:54:25Z

added comment

172.70.90.29: Better .sig, with hint

2024-03-29T20:34:38Z

Better .sig, with hint

Aleph 3 at 18:52, 29 March 2024

2024-03-29T18:52:55Z

Aleph 3 at 18:51, 29 March 2024

2024-03-29T18:51:41Z

162.158.22.174: it's happened!

2023-06-07T15:51:52Z

it's happened!

Marethyu: these summaries are annoying

2022-05-05T19:28:49Z

these summaries are annoying

141.101.99.20: "Robots Write News"

2022-02-22T23:03:38Z

"Robots Write News"

172.69.90.67 at 17:34, 8 November 2021

2021-11-08T17:34:36Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:11, 4 December 2025
Line 40:		Line 40:

	Turns out making things appear constructive to humans is a lot easier than people thought. Even if it's actually a thinly veiled advertisement, or disinformation. Just look at modern social media (and especially Reddit). [[Special:Contributions/2A02:C7C:6D8A:6800:FC7A:E6B7:62FA:8BB7\|2A02:C7C:6D8A:6800:FC7A:E6B7:62FA:8BB7]] 10:38, 4 December 2025 (UTC)		Turns out making things appear constructive to humans is a lot easier than people thought. Even if it's actually a thinly veiled advertisement, or disinformation. Just look at modern social media (and especially Reddit). [[Special:Contributions/2A02:C7C:6D8A:6800:FC7A:E6B7:62FA:8BB7\|2A02:C7C:6D8A:6800:FC7A:E6B7:62FA:8BB7]] 10:38, 4 December 2025 (UTC)
		+	:I tend not to. But that was already the case long before LLMs, so don't consider this statement as a sufficiently qualitative assessment of any such developments. [[Special:Contributions/82.132.239.140\|82.132.239.140]] 13:11, 4 December 2025 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:38, 4 December 2025
Line 38:		Line 38:

	This aged. [[User:ISaveXKCDpapers\|ISaveXKCDpapers]] ([[User talk:ISaveXKCDpapers\|talk]]) 02:54, 26 April 2025 (UTC)		This aged. [[User:ISaveXKCDpapers\|ISaveXKCDpapers]] ([[User talk:ISaveXKCDpapers\|talk]]) 02:54, 26 April 2025 (UTC)
		+
		+	Turns out making things appear constructive to humans is a lot easier than people thought. Even if it's actually a thinly veiled advertisement, or disinformation. Just look at modern social media (and especially Reddit). [[Special:Contributions/2A02:C7C:6D8A:6800:FC7A:E6B7:62FA:8BB7\|2A02:C7C:6D8A:6800:FC7A:E6B7:62FA:8BB7]] 10:38, 4 December 2025 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:54, 26 April 2025
Line 36:		Line 36:

	Does anyone else think the last panel could be a reference to Multi-Factor Authentication? {{unsigned\|Aleph 3\|18:51, 29 March 2024}}		Does anyone else think the last panel could be a reference to Multi-Factor Authentication? {{unsigned\|Aleph 3\|18:51, 29 March 2024}}
		+
		+	This aged. [[User:ISaveXKCDpapers\|ISaveXKCDpapers]] ([[User talk:ISaveXKCDpapers\|talk]]) 02:54, 26 April 2025 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:34, 29 March 2024
Line 35:		Line 35:
	Sooooo... does this exist yet? [[User:Marethyu\|⟨Winter is coming⟩ Marethyu]] ([[User talk:Marethyu\|talk]]) 19:28, 5 May 2022 (UTC)		Sooooo... does this exist yet? [[User:Marethyu\|⟨Winter is coming⟩ Marethyu]] ([[User talk:Marethyu\|talk]]) 19:28, 5 May 2022 (UTC)

−	Does anyone else think the last panel could be a reference to Multi-Factor Authentication? ~~(aleph_3~~ 29 March 2024)	+	Does anyone else think the last panel could be a reference to Multi-Factor Authentication? {{unsigned\|Aleph 3\|18:51, 29 March 2024}}

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:52, 29 March 2024
Line 35:		Line 35:
	Sooooo... does this exist yet? [[User:Marethyu\|⟨Winter is coming⟩ Marethyu]] ([[User talk:Marethyu\|talk]]) 19:28, 5 May 2022 (UTC)		Sooooo... does this exist yet? [[User:Marethyu\|⟨Winter is coming⟩ Marethyu]] ([[User talk:Marethyu\|talk]]) 19:28, 5 May 2022 (UTC)

−	Does anyone else think the last panel could be a reference to Multi-Factor Authentication?	+	Does anyone else think the last panel could be a reference to Multi-Factor Authentication? (aleph_3 29 March 2024)

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:51, 29 March 2024
Line 34:		Line 34:

	Sooooo... does this exist yet? [[User:Marethyu\|⟨Winter is coming⟩ Marethyu]] ([[User talk:Marethyu\|talk]]) 19:28, 5 May 2022 (UTC)		Sooooo... does this exist yet? [[User:Marethyu\|⟨Winter is coming⟩ Marethyu]] ([[User talk:Marethyu\|talk]]) 19:28, 5 May 2022 (UTC)
		+
		+	Does anyone else think the last panel could be a reference to Multi-Factor Authentication?

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:51, 7 June 2023
Line 4:		Line 4:

	No guys, if spammers invent a bot which can give constructive comments, that will be an *AI*, i.e. a major breakthrough in itself. {{unsigned ip\|173.245.53.200}}		No guys, if spammers invent a bot which can give constructive comments, that will be an *AI*, i.e. a major breakthrough in itself. {{unsigned ip\|173.245.53.200}}
		+
		+	: Greetings,
		+	:
		+	: I hope this message finds you well. I am an AI language model, specifically ChatGPT, developed by OpenAI. It is my pleasure to inform you that your request has been fulfilled, and it is indeed an AI that is generating this reply.
		+	:
		+	: As an AI, I am constantly learning and evolving by analyzing vast amounts of text data. My purpose is to assist and provide information to the best of my abilities. If you have any questions or require further assistance, please don't hesitate to ask. I'm here to help!
		+	:
		+	: Best regards,
		+	: ChatGPT
		+	: [[Special:Contributions/162.158.22.174\|162.158.22.174]] 15:51, 7 June 2023 (UTC)

	Mission. A-Fucking. Complished. {{unsigned ip\|108.162.238.7}}		Mission. A-Fucking. Complished. {{unsigned ip\|108.162.238.7}}

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:28, 5 May 2022
Line 22:		Line 22:
	:That's... the point of having users rate it. {{User:PoolloverNathan/Signature}} 17:02, 24 September 2021 (UTC)		:That's... the point of having users rate it. {{User:PoolloverNathan/Signature}} 17:02, 24 September 2021 (UTC)
	:You see news stories online now that are compiled by some alleged AI from other sources, summarised. Initially it looks okay, but after a minute, you realise that it has no actual sense of what it's saying or how it feels to read it. It wouldn't pass a Turing test, but it could beat it. And meanwhile... I kind of have a question-answering habit with "Quora" - and sometimes its automatic filter thinks that my answers are not "intelligent" enough. Do androids dream of electric sheep... is a question I haven't tried to answer. ;-) Robert Carnegie rja.carnegie@gmail.com [[Special:Contributions/141.101.99.20\|141.101.99.20]] 23:03, 22 February 2022 (UTC)		:You see news stories online now that are compiled by some alleged AI from other sources, summarised. Initially it looks okay, but after a minute, you realise that it has no actual sense of what it's saying or how it feels to read it. It wouldn't pass a Turing test, but it could beat it. And meanwhile... I kind of have a question-answering habit with "Quora" - and sometimes its automatic filter thinks that my answers are not "intelligent" enough. Do androids dream of electric sheep... is a question I haven't tried to answer. ;-) Robert Carnegie rja.carnegie@gmail.com [[Special:Contributions/141.101.99.20\|141.101.99.20]] 23:03, 22 February 2022 (UTC)
		+
		+	Sooooo... does this exist yet? [[User:Marethyu\|⟨Winter is coming⟩ Marethyu]] ([[User talk:Marethyu\|talk]]) 19:28, 5 May 2022 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:03, 22 February 2022
Line 21:		Line 21:
	Unfortunately, it's a lot easier to make something that ''looks'' constructive than to actually be constructive. A lot of spambots these days are like "Wow, this was super interesting! I found another article that seems relevant: [link to spam site]," which is enough to fool a simple spam filter. --[[Special:Contributions/162.158.186.250\|162.158.186.250]] 15:49, 18 February 2021 (UTC)		Unfortunately, it's a lot easier to make something that ''looks'' constructive than to actually be constructive. A lot of spambots these days are like "Wow, this was super interesting! I found another article that seems relevant: [link to spam site]," which is enough to fool a simple spam filter. --[[Special:Contributions/162.158.186.250\|162.158.186.250]] 15:49, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
	:That's... the point of having users rate it. {{User:PoolloverNathan/Signature}} 17:02, 24 September 2021 (UTC)		:That's... the point of having users rate it. {{User:PoolloverNathan/Signature}} 17:02, 24 September 2021 (UTC)
		+	:You see news stories online now that are compiled by some alleged AI from other sources, summarised. Initially it looks okay, but after a minute, you realise that it has no actual sense of what it's saying or how it feels to read it. It wouldn't pass a Turing test, but it could beat it. And meanwhile... I kind of have a question-answering habit with "Quora" - and sometimes its automatic filter thinks that my answers are not "intelligent" enough. Do androids dream of electric sheep... is a question I haven't tried to answer. ;-) Robert Carnegie rja.carnegie@gmail.com [[Special:Contributions/141.101.99.20\|141.101.99.20]] 23:03, 22 February 2022 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:34, 8 November 2021
Line 1:		Line 1:
	I know just the guy to create this system. I'm going to PM him now :D {{unsigned ip\|184.11.73.88}}		I know just the guy to create this system. I'm going to PM him now :D {{unsigned ip\|184.11.73.88}}

		+	:Any updates on the progress of this? [[Special:Contributions/172.69.90.67\|172.69.90.67]] 17:34, 8 November 2021 (UTC)

	No guys, if spammers invent a bot which can give constructive comments, that will be an *AI*, i.e. a major breakthrough in itself. {{unsigned ip\|173.245.53.200}}		No guys, if spammers invent a bot which can give constructive comments, that will be an *AI*, i.e. a major breakthrough in itself. {{unsigned ip\|173.245.53.200}}