Editing 1991: Research Areas by Size and Countedness
Warning: You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you log in or create an account, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
The edit can be undone.
Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then save the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
Latest revision | Your text | ||
Line 202: | Line 202: | ||
==Trivia== | ==Trivia== | ||
− | + | ===Table with coordinates=== | |
+ | *Here is a sortable table with the coordinates in percentage given. | ||
+ | **They have been taken from the discussion where "Zetfr" states that | ||
+ | ***I have determined the exact position of each science on both axes. | ||
+ | ***I computed the center of the smallest rectangle that encloses each name. | ||
+ | ***Here they are, expressed as percentages, assuming 0% and 100% correspond to the arrow tips on each axis. | ||
+ | ****It could be argued that cosmology size should be at 100% and Theology knowledge 0%, etc. but that is just semantics. | ||
+ | ****The interesting here is what order Randall seems to have put the different fields and object sizes. | ||
+ | **To begin with they are sorted after the size of the ting the research are studies, with the smallest first. | ||
{|class="wikitable sortable" | {|class="wikitable sortable" | ||
! Research area | ! Research area |