Editing 2507: USV-C

Jump to: navigation, search

Warning: You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you log in or create an account, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.

The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then save the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
Latest revision Your text
Line 22: Line 22:
 
It also refers to the use of a {{w|Polarizing filter (photography)|polarizing filter}} which takes unpolarized light waves and blocks out the waves that are not oriented in the same direction. These are used in sunglasses and photography to eliminate glare and enhance the image. These filters do need to be oriented in a specific direction in order to have the desired effect of passing/blocking a given polarization, perhaps to separate two perpendicularly orientated 'channels' that need to be unmixed exactly knowing the respective orientation of the two signals (''or'' exactly 180Β° out, which is what USB-C effectively allows for at present).
 
It also refers to the use of a {{w|Polarizing filter (photography)|polarizing filter}} which takes unpolarized light waves and blocks out the waves that are not oriented in the same direction. These are used in sunglasses and photography to eliminate glare and enhance the image. These filters do need to be oriented in a specific direction in order to have the desired effect of passing/blocking a given polarization, perhaps to separate two perpendicularly orientated 'channels' that need to be unmixed exactly knowing the respective orientation of the two signals (''or'' exactly 180Β° out, which is what USB-C effectively allows for at present).
  
βˆ’
The light could also have been {{w|Circular_polarization|circularly polarized}}, which allows 'left' and 'right' rotating polarizations to simultaneously carry separate signals, but {{w|3D_film#Polarization_systems|not require the same strict orientation}} to operate properly, at all, so long as arbitrary mirrors are not involved at any stage of the optical path. Regardless, the implication here is that there is ''no'' deliberate rationalization of the light to contend with, anyway, which seems to be just making a positive point out of a potentially lost opportunity to double any intended signal bandwidth. The name "Ultra-Serial Violet..." could be read as consciously eschewing ''all'' attempts at parallelism, including talkback.
+
The light could also have been {{w|Circular_polarization|circularly polarized}}, which allows 'left' and 'right' rotating polarizations to simultaneously carry separate signals, but {{w|3D_film#Polarization_systems|not require the same strict orientation}} to operate properly, at all, so long as arbitrary mirrors are not involved at any stage of the optical path. Regardless, the implication here is that there is ''no'' deliberate rationalization of the light to contend with, anyway, which seems to be just making a positive point out of a potentially lost opportunity to double any intended signal bandwidth. The name "Ultra-Serial Violet..." could be read as consciously eschewing ''all'' attempts at parallelism.
  
 
==Transcript==
 
==Transcript==

Please note that all contributions to explain xkcd may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see explain xkcd:Copyrights for details). Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!

To protect the wiki against automated edit spam, we kindly ask you to solve the following CAPTCHA:

Cancel | Editing help (opens in new window)