529: Sledding Discussion

Explain xkcd: It's 'cause you're dumb.
Revision as of 20:05, 11 August 2014 by 108.162.216.132 (talk) (Explanation)
Jump to: navigation, search
Sledding Discussion
If you get your hands on that one, it's the worst place to have a breaking-up conversation.
Title text: If you get your hands on that one, it's the worst place to have a breaking-up conversation.

Explanation

Calvin and Hobbes is an acclaimed newspaper comic strip that ran from 1985 to 1995. Calvin is a six-year-old child with an active imagination, and Hobbes is his stuffed tiger who Calvin perceives to be alive through his imagination (Although some argue that Hobbes actually is alive, citing that Calvin would not have been able to do things that he "imagined" Hobbes helping him with on his own, like getting mail from a mailbox that's too high for him to reach). The two frequently had philosophical conversations, often while sledding. Calvin sledded on densely-wooded hills near where he lived, and the ride would often serve as a perfect parallel to the conversation they were having; for example, in one strip, Calvin talks about how seemingly mundane decisions can nonetheless have lasting consequences, by pointing out how all of the things they see as they continue down the hill (and eventually crash into a ravine) are a direct result of him having taken a particular fork early on.

Cueball and Megan, on the other hand, have a perfectly normal sled ride down a perfectly normal hill. The reader expects something ironic to happen, since they're engaging in what's traditionally a children's pastime while discussing how they've grown too old for certain things. Instead, the only humor arises from their commentary on the lack of humor.

An alternative (and more depressing) reading is that Cueball's statement that he "hates having options closed off to him, like he's given up a life that was once possible" is a commentary on their relationship having stagnated (since in the next panel Megan references their anniversary). In which case, the humor would be that they do have the Calvin and Hobbes model toboggan, but are too grown-up to recognize it and are therefore doomed to be stuck in an unfulfilling relationship.

The title text notes that it's a bad place to have a breaking up conversation, presumably because the sled itself would literally break up during the journey, with potentially dangerous consequences.

Transcript

[Megan looks out window through blinds.]
Megan: It's snowing!
Cueball: [from off-screen] Sled time!
[Megan and Cueball outside with sled, at the top of a hill.]
Cueball: It depresses me that I'm too old to learn another language fluently. My brain's solidified.
[Megan and Cueball sledding down the hill.]
Megan: Is there one you wish you knew?
Cueball: No, I just hate having options closed to me. Like I've given up a life that was once possible.
[At the bottom of the hill, sled has stopped.]
Megan: Yeah. Which reminds me - our anniversary is coming up.
Megan: Man, that ride failed to be a metaphor for our conversation.
Cueball: Guess this isn't the Calvin & Hobbes-model toboggan.


comment.png add a comment! ⋅ comment.png add a topic (use sparingly)! ⋅ Icons-mini-action refresh blue.gif refresh comments!

Discussion

I am convinced there is also a subtle reference to one of Calvin's gags, regarding a toboggan's "model year". I'm a little too lazy to delve back into an archives site and cite it though, so have fun looking for it! Anonymous 04:06, 4 December 2013 (UTC)

I believe that the initial conversation of the loss of language opportunity refers to a theory in Language Acquisition called Critical Period Hypothesis[1]. 108.162.216.32 23:47, 6 September 2014 (UTC)

If it wasn't for the titletext I would've thought Megan to be referring to the lost freedom of being a single. Only after that I understood the "failed metaphor" part. 162.158.90.212

Except it's not closed to you. Plenty of people learn languages later in life that they end up being completely fluent in. Benjaminikuta (talk) 03:50, 26 March 2016 (UTC)

pancakes or waffles? - Tell me what you think. -- Comment Police (talk) (please sign your comments with ~~~~)

I think a section heading is unnecessary. And comments should be signed. 141.101.98.244 15:59, 1 February 2018 (UTC)

I found the model year strip the other Anonymous was commenting about: https://www.gocomics.com/calvinandhobbes/2014/01/03

Is the ride actually a failed metaphor? If you accept a very cynical view on relationships, the ride goes slowly downhill, eventually leveling out at the bottom and slowly coasting to a stop, leaving you disappointed and having expected it to be more exciting than it was. When it's over you e not really gone anywhere, and you are left with the feeling that there should have been more to it. I mean, yeah it's dark as sin, but that does seem to be the vibe.