Difference between revisions of "583: CNR"

Explain xkcd: It's 'cause you're dumb.
Jump to: navigation, search
(added comic and discussion)
(Explanation: wording change with a bit more details)
Line 10: Line 10:
 
== Explanation ==
 
== Explanation ==
  
In this comic, "could not reproduce" is a double entendre. Because the reported bug was that speech recognition failed on a young child's voice, the programming team attempted to have a child in order to fix the bug and get the test subject. The bug report is closed with the reason being "could not reproduce."
+
In this comic, "could not reproduce" is a {{w|double entendre}}. Because the reported bug is that speech recognition failed on a young child's voice, the programming team attempt to reproduce (biologically) in order to have a child to use as a test subject to understand and fix the bug, starting by reproducing it (the bug). However the attempt fail, as shown by the negative pregnancy test, and therefore the bug report is closed with the reason being "could not reproduce": they could not reproduce the bug because they could not reproduce biologically.
  
This reason shows up in comic [[937: TornadoGuard]].
+
This reason also shows up in comic [[937: TornadoGuard]].
  
 
{{comic discussion}}
 
{{comic discussion}}

Revision as of 09:20, 23 August 2012

CNR
Can't and shouldn't.
Title text: Can't and shouldn't.

Explanation

In this comic, "could not reproduce" is a double entendre. Because the reported bug is that speech recognition failed on a young child's voice, the programming team attempt to reproduce (biologically) in order to have a child to use as a test subject to understand and fix the bug, starting by reproducing it (the bug). However the attempt fail, as shown by the negative pregnancy test, and therefore the bug report is closed with the reason being "could not reproduce": they could not reproduce the bug because they could not reproduce biologically.

This reason also shows up in comic 937: TornadoGuard.


comment.png add a comment! ⋅ comment.png add a topic (use sparingly)! ⋅ Icons-mini-action refresh blue.gif refresh comments!

Discussion

It's kind of silly that they'd need to make a new kid. There are plenty of them for free in any given shopping mall on any day!

(No, I do not condone abducting children, even for science.)Pennpenn (talk) 03:57, 14 February 2014 (UTC)

@Pennpenn: For $847.63 you can buy a child in the supermarket. Or could, in 1989. The Simpsons already did it! 173.245.53.147 (talk) (please sign your comments with ~~~~)


The title text may also be a reference to the Ig Nobel Prize, which is awarded to research that "cannot or should not be reproduced." Enter your username (talk) 13:19, 6 November 2020 (UTC)