Difference between revisions of "6: Irony"
m (→Trivia: Adding {{Comic discussion}}) |
|||
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
| date = September 30, 2005 | | date = September 30, 2005 | ||
| title = Irony | | title = Irony | ||
− | | image = | + | | image = irony_color.jpg |
| imagesize = | | imagesize = | ||
− | | titletext | + | | titletext = It's commonly known that too much perspective can be a downer. |
}} | }} | ||
− | |||
− | |||
− | + | == Explanation == | |
− | Man 1: This statement wouldn't be funny if not for irony! | + | == Transcript == |
+ | : Narrator: When self-reference, irony, and meta-humor go too far | ||
+ | : Narrator: A CAUTIONARY TALE | ||
+ | : Man 1: This statement wouldn't be funny if not for irony! | ||
+ | : Man 1: ha ha | ||
+ | : Man 2: ha ha, I guess. | ||
+ | : Narrator: 20,000 years later... | ||
+ | : [desolate badlands landscape with an imposing sun in the sky] | ||
− | + | == Trivia == | |
− | + | * [Quote from [[Randall]]] "Too much perspective can do that." | |
− | + | * Originally posted at [[Randall]]'s livejournal site. | |
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | ==Trivia== | ||
− | *[Quote from [[Randall]]] "Too much perspective can do that." | ||
− | *Originally posted at [[Randall]]'s livejournal site. | ||
{{Comic discussion}} | {{Comic discussion}} |
Revision as of 14:17, 12 August 2012
Irony |
Title text: It's commonly known that too much perspective can be a downer. |
Explanation
Transcript
- Narrator: When self-reference, irony, and meta-humor go too far
- Narrator: A CAUTIONARY TALE
- Man 1: This statement wouldn't be funny if not for irony!
- Man 1: ha ha
- Man 2: ha ha, I guess.
- Narrator: 20,000 years later...
- [desolate badlands landscape with an imposing sun in the sky]
Trivia
- [Quote from Randall] "Too much perspective can do that."
- Originally posted at Randall's livejournal site.
Discussion
You can definitely see an improvement in these comics as Randall learns to clean drawings and form a proper punchline. Davidy22[talk] 14:07, 8 January 2013 (UTC)
I think this explanation is incomplete. Benjaminikuta (talk) 03:41, 11 August 2014 (UTC)
There is a community portal discussion of what to call Cueball and what to do in case with more than one Cueball. I have added this comic to the new Category:Multiple Cueballs. Since there is really only one Cueball that "talks" I think it is fine to keep him as Cueball. Just made a note that the other guy also looks like Cueball. Also noted that this is the first comic both with Cueball and with Multiple Cueballs --Kynde (talk) 17:06, 15 March 2015 (UTC)