Editing 867: Herpetology

Jump to: navigation, search

Warning: You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you log in or create an account, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.

The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then save the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
Latest revision Your text
Line 14: Line 14:
 
Herpetologists would rightly see this view as a threat to their territory, their budgets and even their existence.
 
Herpetologists would rightly see this view as a threat to their territory, their budgets and even their existence.
  
βˆ’
The claim made by the ornithologist is fundamentally correct; the evolutionary history of those groups did actually diverge in that way. So, instead of arguing the science, [[Megan]], the presenter at the herpetology conference resorts to a personal attack on the profession of ornithology.  At their own conference, they retaliate with a chart that purports to demonstrate that ''douchebags'' and ''ornithologists'' are more closely related to each other than either are to ''nice people'', and they can therefore be grouped into an encompassing ''asshole'' classification.
+
The claim made by the ornithologist is fundamentally correct; the evolutionary history of those groups did actually diverge in that way. So, instead of arguing the science, [[Megan]], the presenter at the herpetology conference resort to a personal attack on the profession of ornithology.  At their own conference, they retaliate with a chart that purports to demonstrate that ''douchebags'' and ''ornithologists'' are more closely related to each other than either are to ''nice people'', and they can therefore be grouped into an encompassing ''asshole'' classification.
  
 
Since the intent of the earlier presentation was presumably to rile herpetologists rather than achieve any particular scientific goal, this response seems appropriate.
 
Since the intent of the earlier presentation was presumably to rile herpetologists rather than achieve any particular scientific goal, this response seems appropriate.

Please note that all contributions to explain xkcd may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see explain xkcd:Copyrights for details). Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!

To protect the wiki against automated edit spam, we kindly ask you to solve the following CAPTCHA:

Cancel | Editing help (opens in new window)