Ena exo na pw mono.Eisai KATAPLIKTIKOS anthropos filos kai foarootfgs.Emeis se efxaristoume pou panta bazis toso agapi kai meraki sti douleia sou!!!!!!!!!!!!!Kai na xeris oti oli ma oli oi fili kai sigenis pou htan ston gamo exoun latrepsi tis fotografies sou,kai tis kenourgies, kai stelnoun ta sixaritiria tous!!!!!!!Na se panta kala kai panta tetia.Rantevou tora sti gena eeeeee?
- [Person 1 is sitting at a desk with a laptop, looking at a review website]
- Person 1: What's with this negative review? You *liked* that hotel.
- Black Hat Man: I have a script that posts a bad review for every hotel I stay at. It reduces demand, which means more vacancies and lower prices next time.
- Person 1: What if the place sucks?
- Black Hat Man: I change the review to positive to steer other people over there.
- Person 1: You punish companies you like!
- Black Hat Man: The odds of *my* review putting a hotel out of business are negligible.
- Person 1: If we all did that the system would collapse!
- Black Hat Man: Doesn't affect my logic. Tragedy of the commons.
- Person 1: That's not even the tragedy of the commons anymore. That's the tragedy of you're a dick.
- Black Hat Man: If you're quick with a knife, you'll find that the invisible hand is made of delicious invisible meat.
add a comment! ⋅ add a topic (use sparingly)! ⋅ refresh comments!
I hardly ever visit the same place twice, so I'd have to give hotels bad reviews ahead of time so that I get lower prices when I get there. Hell, why doesn't Black Hat do that? That way, he can avoid paying full price on his first visit to the hotel, which is what he wants, isn't it? The dishonesty of writing a bad review before he visits shouldn't be a deterrent to a person like him, so why not? Davidy²²[talk] 08:39, 9 March 2013 (UTC)
How did cue ball find out he liked it. Although it is only one person, knowing him directly gives him extra influence. I would say it is about the amount of influence of a review.--22.214.171.124 02:02, 15 February 2014 (UTC)
- Cueball seems to be friendly enough with Black Hat, so quite likely Black Hat simply mentioned that to Cueball before. Arifsaha (talk) 19:51, 21 November 2014 (UTC)
- While lying to Cueball about the quality of a hotel would reduce the overall demand, it is unlikely that both Black Hat and Cueball would both be travelling to the same city over the same date range, effectively meaning they are not competitors. Furthermore, if they were travelling together it is more likely that they would share a room, rental car or other resource, so having Cueball know his preferences benefits Black Hat. 126.96.36.199 20:44, 12 December 2014 (UTC)
Is the title text a reference to a scene in a horror movie? Arifsaha (talk) 19:51, 21 November 2014 (UTC)
- Highly unlikely, unless you can actually find a horror movie that incorporates those elements (I really hope you can't) -Pennpenn 188.8.131.52 02:59, 4 March 2016 (UTC)
"Confirmed buyer" tags exist. Maybe Black Hat thinks that reviews without that tags wouldn't be convincing enough to be effective.
On the tragedy of You-are-a-dick: this is the real Tragedy of the Commons. Indeed quite different from Black Hat's tragedy of you-are-a-dick. My uni has a well-drawn version of this image on posters all over.
http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-r-IYVLEtd7c/Te-HBryOP6I/AAAAAAAAANs/RC9LTMLSp9o/s1600/GDP+as+Tragedy+of+the+Commons.JPG 184.108.40.206 (talk) (please sign your comments with ~~~~)