Difference between revisions of "Talk:1006: Sloppier Than Fiction"
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
" Oh and FYI, if anyone ever says "It wasn't technically cheating"... it was cheating. " -> This is only true for the more orthodox kinds of relationships. [[Special:Contributions/108.162.229.29|108.162.229.29]] 02:07, 29 January 2014 (UTC) | " Oh and FYI, if anyone ever says "It wasn't technically cheating"... it was cheating. " -> This is only true for the more orthodox kinds of relationships. [[Special:Contributions/108.162.229.29|108.162.229.29]] 02:07, 29 January 2014 (UTC) | ||
| + | Agreed. [[Special:Contributions/108.162.216.29|108.162.216.29]] 19:40, 26 February 2015 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 19:40, 26 February 2015
To me this is the lesson that sometimes we miss the most obvious thing: If you felt like you needed to do something that WASN'T technically cheating, perhaps what you shared WASN'T technically love. So if it was not love our beerded (at least I think it's a beer in his cup) friend lost, what was it? - e-inspired 98.211.199.84 15:21, 27 February 2013 (UTC)
- The positive strings attached to that quasi-love? --Quicksilver (talk) 06:47, 17 August 2013 (UTC)
" Oh and FYI, if anyone ever says "It wasn't technically cheating"... it was cheating. " -> This is only true for the more orthodox kinds of relationships. 108.162.229.29 02:07, 29 January 2014 (UTC) Agreed. 108.162.216.29 19:40, 26 February 2015 (UTC)
