Difference between revisions of "Talk:1089: Internal Monologue"

Explain xkcd: It's 'cause you're dumb.
Jump to: navigation, search
(Discussion: new section)
Line 4: Line 4:
  
 
:I copied this into the article. [[User:Bugefun|Bugefun]] ([[User talk:Bugefun|talk]]) 19:58, 1 August 2012 (EDT)
 
:I copied this into the article. [[User:Bugefun|Bugefun]] ([[User talk:Bugefun|talk]]) 19:58, 1 August 2012 (EDT)
 +
 +
== Discussion ==
 +
 +
 +
  Joe Green
 +
August 1st, 2012
 +
Yes I like the participatory and discursive nature of the comments.
 +
Also in this instance I find myself wondering why Cueball is hoping that OtherCueball “doesn’t ask me what his name is”. That would be a very strange thing to ask. Well, except in the form “do/don’t you know who I am?”
 +
( REPLY )
 +
 +
+2    BigMal
 +
August 1st, 2012
 +
It’s more like “I know he introduced him/herself earlier, but I already forgot, and he probably remembers my name, so if he asks me to recall his name I’d be caught (and embarrassed)!”
 +
( REPLY )
 +
 +
  Joe Green
 +
August 1st, 2012
 +
“if he asks me to recall his name”
 +
Well yes, but I just thought that was an unlikely thing for someone to do in such a direct way.
 +
Cueball *could* end up being embarrassed in that kind of way though if a friend of his joined the conversation and he wanted to introduce OtherCueball.
 +
( REPLY )
 +
 +
  Harm
 +
August 2nd, 2012
 +
My solution to situations like that is something like “Go on, introduce yourselves,” and then standing back.

Revision as of 09:28, 2 August 2012

This is a common anxiety for geek types, who stereotypically are not very skilled in navigating social situations like parties. It can become a vicious cycle where the fear of handling the encounter badly makes one even more uncomfortable which results in behaving as awkwardly as they first feared. Also, for many geek type personalities, it's common to want to map out a pre-planned course of action that should produce desired results. A strategy that is usually doomed to failure when dealing with sufficiently complex and unpredictable scenarios... like conversations with other people. This painful, and all too common situation has been mined for comedic effect since the beginning of human civilization.

I copied this into the article. Bugefun (talk) 19:58, 1 August 2012 (EDT)

Discussion

  Joe Green

August 1st, 2012 Yes I like the participatory and discursive nature of the comments. Also in this instance I find myself wondering why Cueball is hoping that OtherCueball “doesn’t ask me what his name is”. That would be a very strange thing to ask. Well, except in the form “do/don’t you know who I am?” ( REPLY )

+2 BigMal August 1st, 2012 It’s more like “I know he introduced him/herself earlier, but I already forgot, and he probably remembers my name, so if he asks me to recall his name I’d be caught (and embarrassed)!” ( REPLY )

  Joe Green

August 1st, 2012 “if he asks me to recall his name” Well yes, but I just thought that was an unlikely thing for someone to do in such a direct way. Cueball *could* end up being embarrassed in that kind of way though if a friend of his joined the conversation and he wanted to introduce OtherCueball. ( REPLY )

  Harm

August 2nd, 2012 My solution to situations like that is something like “Go on, introduce yourselves,” and then standing back.