Ya can't explain this one!220.127.116.11 11:06, 12 December 2012 (UTC)
- No, other work is getting in the way. Someone else'll do it. Davidy22[talk] 11:15, 12 December 2012 (UTC)
- The honesty of this comic makes it pretty self-explanatory. I like it. 18.104.22.168 12:21, 12 December 2012 (UTC)
That 1-line explanation by anon 22.214.171.124 is brilliant.
Most people, despite looking generally competent, are just barely making it through the day.
Let's be honest, how can one tell which character is Cueball? Personally, I think this character is far too generic to bother anyways. 126.96.36.199 20:28, 12 December 2012 (UTC) madd
- Cueball is the first "Cueball" to speak in a comic, everyone else is called something else.Pennpenn (talk) 03:30, 26 February 2014 (UTC)
- In my mind, Cueball has a quirky or strange personality. In this comic, the second Cueball is the quirky and weird one, so for me, he is the True Cueball. It isn't just me: there's a category for comics which have multiple Cueballs which at the time of writing says, "In most of these, one of the Cueballs is clearly the protagonist of the comic, and he will thus be called Cueball in the explanation out of convenience." To me this confirms that the second Cueball is the true Cueball. IAmADroid (talk) 19:32, 14 June 2022 (UTC)
can't be reference to #overlyhonestmethods since comic came out a month before.
- I made an edit to add a reference to the ADD strip earlier. It is not very good. If someone would clean it up, that would probably be a good thing. This one really does seem to be a reference to those kinds of difficulties. In my defense, I don't understand why anything happens and I'm confused and scared and trying really hard all the time. Also I've been reading xkcd for two days straight. Singlelinelabyrinth (talk) 04:40, 26 July 2020 (UTC)