Difference between revisions of "Talk:1197: All Adobe Updates"
(Wasn't that a Rush Reference?) |
|||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
I am surprised noone commented on the connection to the Rush Song 2112 and it's Oracle. [[Special:Contributions/99.102.154.28|99.102.154.28]] 01:19, 10 August 2013 (UTC) | I am surprised noone commented on the connection to the Rush Song 2112 and it's Oracle. [[Special:Contributions/99.102.154.28|99.102.154.28]] 01:19, 10 August 2013 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | Title text: It's because you're still running Windows 2000 or XP. (Windows NT 5.x) You need at least Windows Vista (6.0) to apply the update... [[Special:Contributions/108.162.221.53|108.162.221.53]] 02:13, 29 March 2014 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 02:13, 29 March 2014
Is there the additional joke of choosing "Ok (to download)" or "Download (it's ok!)"? And all the strip it lacks (for space, opportunity or brevity) is an all-but-forced toolbar download. Unless that's counted as part of the Java download. (Ask? Really?) 178.99.244.212 13:00, 10 April 2013 (UTC)
- In my eyes the joke goes a bit further: The window ask the user to install an update for the update-manager so it can download new updates for the update-downloader – so software A would like to update software B that might update the real software in/at the end. --DaB. (talk) 13:12, 10 April 2013 (UTC)
I am surprised noone commented on the connection to the Rush Song 2112 and it's Oracle. 99.102.154.28 01:19, 10 August 2013 (UTC)
Title text: It's because you're still running Windows 2000 or XP. (Windows NT 5.x) You need at least Windows Vista (6.0) to apply the update... 108.162.221.53 02:13, 29 March 2014 (UTC)
