Difference between revisions of "Talk:125: Marketing Interview"

Explain xkcd: It's 'cause you're dumb.
Jump to: navigation, search
(Question)
Line 2: Line 2:
  
 
I don't understand what you mean by "rare case"[[Special:Contributions/108.162.219.202|108.162.219.202]] 05:14, 30 December 2013 (UTC)
 
I don't understand what you mean by "rare case"[[Special:Contributions/108.162.219.202|108.162.219.202]] 05:14, 30 December 2013 (UTC)
 +
 +
:Agreed. The title text appears to connote that although a case of Black Hat or his ilk is rare, the tendency of good marketers' books to sell better ought most often to be the rule rather than the exception. --[[User:Jolbucley|Jolbucley]] ([[User talk:Jolbucley|talk]]) 04:16, 29 January 2014 (UTC)

Revision as of 04:16, 29 January 2014

I believe I disagree with the explanation of the title text on this one. To me it suggests that this would be a rare case in which buying the most popular book would be the best because the people who wrote it obviously know a great deal about marketing. ‎75.151.211.170 (talk) (please sign your comments with ~~~~)

I don't understand what you mean by "rare case"108.162.219.202 05:14, 30 December 2013 (UTC)

Agreed. The title text appears to connote that although a case of Black Hat or his ilk is rare, the tendency of good marketers' books to sell better ought most often to be the rule rather than the exception. --Jolbucley (talk) 04:16, 29 January 2014 (UTC)