Talk:1261: Shake That
Worst xkcd Ever! 78.55.145.25 08:31, 6 September 2013 (UTC)
Hey, it's not the worst xkcd ever. What about the early xkcd strips, where most of them were just sketches or drawings? GameZone (talk) 08:37, 6 September 2013 (UTC)
Surely "Worst. xkcd. Ever!" No? Turning to the explanation, I like the phase lag explanation. Never thought of sexual exhibitionism in those terms before.--203.166.249.26 08:46, 6 September 2013 (UTC)
Hugely impressed by the explanation. I would never have thought you could write so much about such a dry comic. --Mynotoar (talk) 09:34, 6 September 2013 (UTC)
This explanation makes me so happy. Make an account, anonymous user at IP 220.224.246.97 and come collect your praise for such a great explanation! --Jeff (talk) 15:27, 6 September 2013 (UTC)
Perhaps the XKCD website was hacked? 88.174.225.205 (talk) (please sign your comments with ~~~~)
Truly stunning explanation. Come and collect your internets. 78.105.231.184 20:49, 6 September 2013 (UTC)
Haha, PHASE LAG cracked me up. Props for the explanation; I didn't understand the comic at all. 223.239.158.130 (talk) (please sign your comments with ~~~~)
To the nay-sayers: "[XKCD is] A webcomic of romance, sarcasm, math, and language." Quit with the downers, man, and get with the groove!
(Also, it'd probably be a general rule that, paid-for bodysculpting aside, a girls breasts and/or buttocks have a good chance of being like those of her mother. Thus she 'gives you'(/her) that big butt (not a universally desirable feature amongst womankind) or set of boobies that the DJ/MC/whoever is probably after encouraging the physical highlighting of. But that's a boring (and only half right) detail about the explanation. All praise to the current version, and don't add any more to it on my account.) 31.126.86.231 19:17, 7 September 2013 (UTC)
Interpreting a "yo mama" line literally was also done in 502: Dark Flow; that connection may give this one similar poignance... 90.197.95.152 19:24, 7 September 2013 (UTC)
