Difference between revisions of "Talk:1304: Glass Trolling"

Explain xkcd: It's 'cause you're dumb.
Jump to: navigation, search
(replied)
m (I'll get this down eventually.)
Line 6: Line 6:
 
: Speaking in gross costs, yes.  My new glasses cost well over $400 USD.  Thankfully, due to decent vision insurance, I only paid $53 for exam ($10), frame/lenses ($20) and the upcharge (discounted) for polycarbonate lenses.  Context: I have heavy astigmatism (especially my left eye) plus farsightedness. --BigMal // [[Special:Contributions/108.162.216.57|108.162.216.57]] 13:37, 16 December 2013 (UTC)
 
: Speaking in gross costs, yes.  My new glasses cost well over $400 USD.  Thankfully, due to decent vision insurance, I only paid $53 for exam ($10), frame/lenses ($20) and the upcharge (discounted) for polycarbonate lenses.  Context: I have heavy astigmatism (especially my left eye) plus farsightedness. --BigMal // [[Special:Contributions/108.162.216.57|108.162.216.57]] 13:37, 16 December 2013 (UTC)
 
: Will people who need to wear glasses be able to wear Google Glass? Or would that be a problem? [[User:PheagleAdler|PheagleAdler]] ([[User talk:PheagleAdler|talk]]) 06:55, 17 December 2013 (UTC)
 
: Will people who need to wear glasses be able to wear Google Glass? Or would that be a problem? [[User:PheagleAdler|PheagleAdler]] ([[User talk:PheagleAdler|talk]]) 06:55, 17 December 2013 (UTC)
:no,the glass unit of now has support for lenses. --[[User:Mralext20|Mralext20]] ([[User talk:Mralext20|talk]]) 07:50, 17 December 2013 (UTC)
+
::no,the glass unit of now has support for lenses. --[[User:Mralext20|Mralext20]] ([[User talk:Mralext20|talk]]) 07:50, 17 December 2013 (UTC)
  
 
Made a major edit to the article, it is now much clearer and more informative IMHO. Feel free to tweak. --[[Special:Contributions/141.101.98.135|141.101.98.135]] 20:31, 16 December 2013 (UTC) (actually [[User:NeatNit]], cba to log in)
 
Made a major edit to the article, it is now much clearer and more informative IMHO. Feel free to tweak. --[[Special:Contributions/141.101.98.135|141.101.98.135]] 20:31, 16 December 2013 (UTC) (actually [[User:NeatNit]], cba to log in)
  
 
Using : OK, glass! on a smartphone medically is a symptom of "ejaculatio praecox". {{unsigned ip|108.162.231.222}}
 
Using : OK, glass! on a smartphone medically is a symptom of "ejaculatio praecox". {{unsigned ip|108.162.231.222}}

Revision as of 07:51, 17 December 2013

In google now, you can use "OK glass" instead of "OK google".--Mralext20 (talk) 05:23, 16 December 2013 (UTC)

There are actually privacy activists who call for grabbing such gadgets and destroying them by stomping on them. Google for "#camover" in combination with "google glass" to find hints. --Kigana (talk) 08:58, 16 December 2013 (UTC)

I don't know, aren't dioptric glasses correcting more complicated problems like astigmatism also costly? -- Hkmaly (talk) 09:55, 16 December 2013 (UTC)

Speaking in gross costs, yes. My new glasses cost well over $400 USD. Thankfully, due to decent vision insurance, I only paid $53 for exam ($10), frame/lenses ($20) and the upcharge (discounted) for polycarbonate lenses. Context: I have heavy astigmatism (especially my left eye) plus farsightedness. --BigMal // 108.162.216.57 13:37, 16 December 2013 (UTC)
Will people who need to wear glasses be able to wear Google Glass? Or would that be a problem? PheagleAdler (talk) 06:55, 17 December 2013 (UTC)
no,the glass unit of now has support for lenses. --Mralext20 (talk) 07:50, 17 December 2013 (UTC)

Made a major edit to the article, it is now much clearer and more informative IMHO. Feel free to tweak. --141.101.98.135 20:31, 16 December 2013 (UTC) (actually User:NeatNit, cba to log in)

Using : OK, glass! on a smartphone medically is a symptom of "ejaculatio praecox". 108.162.231.222 (talk) (please sign your comments with ~~~~)