Is the Earth baby the real reason Krypton was destroyed? 18.104.22.168 08:58, 20 June 2014 (UTC)
Is now a good time to mark the shark jump? --22.214.171.124 12:52, 20 June 2014 (UTC) -Only if this keeps up. Yeah, it's a crappy comic, but I don't think the quality overall has been dropping that much. Everyone has off days. 126.96.36.199 13:58, 20 June 2014 (UTC)
Not so bad if you can relate to the anguish of parenting a colicky kid. Sending him to Krypton is an improvement on some of the things I was tempted to do. 188.8.131.52 15:08, 20 June 2014 (UTC)
It may be a cultural-linguistic thing, but I felt compelled to change "cries" to "crying", in the explanation. Hearing "his cries" is redolent of "Ahoy there!" coming from a person attracting attention in a nautical context, the various distinctive calls of a person selling produce in a street-market or "I'm up here! Get me down!" from a person stuck on the ledge of a burning building. When a baby cries (as opposed to when someone "cries out") you hear him (or her... it's not actually specificed) 'crying', not his(/her) 'calling-cries', even though both are indeed similar forms of attracting attention. I've overthought this, of course. 184.108.40.206 15:19, 20 June 2014 (UTC)
(Also, should the baby survive... somehow... would Earth Rock, howsoever sent there, be naturally strenghthening to the child? Assuming similarly transmuted as per the mundane (for native Kryptonians) planetary material beneath their feet was, during the cataclysm... It'd probably depend on which subsection of Superman canon you observed, as they tend to reinvent the 'physics' behind standard green kryptonite, even before adding in the other colours of it...) 220.127.116.11 15:19, 20 June 2014 (UTC)
Can someone explain how this is funny?