Difference between revisions of "Talk:1467: Email"
(Created page with "The strftime format used is probably %Y-%M-%D %h:%m:%s, which visibly looks as if it will yield a date and time, yet doesn't. A more correct format would have been %Y-%m-%d %H...") |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
The strftime format used is probably %Y-%M-%D %h:%m:%s, which visibly looks as if it will yield a date and time, yet doesn't. A more correct format would have been %Y-%m-%d %H:%M:%S. | The strftime format used is probably %Y-%M-%D %h:%m:%s, which visibly looks as if it will yield a date and time, yet doesn't. A more correct format would have been %Y-%m-%d %H:%M:%S. | ||
| + | |||
| + | There's a strange think with the date string : why 30 ? The timestamp shows 31 as a day in month and 5:54 which doesn't match 30, and this week is the 53rd in the year... [[User:Goufalite|Goufalite]] ([[User talk:Goufalite|talk]]) 09:57, 31 December 2014 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 09:57, 31 December 2014
The strftime format used is probably %Y-%M-%D %h:%m:%s, which visibly looks as if it will yield a date and time, yet doesn't. A more correct format would have been %Y-%m-%d %H:%M:%S.
There's a strange think with the date string : why 30 ? The timestamp shows 31 as a day in month and 5:54 which doesn't match 30, and this week is the 53rd in the year... Goufalite (talk) 09:57, 31 December 2014 (UTC)
