Editing Talk:1483: Quotative Like
Please sign your posts with ~~~~ |
Warning: You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you log in or create an account, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
The edit can be undone.
Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then save the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
Latest revision | Your text | ||
Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
Are there any other examples of actual living people who are not celebrities being name-checked in xkcd? [[User:Andries|Andries]] ([[User talk:Andries|talk]]) 13:23, 6 February 2015 (UTC) | Are there any other examples of actual living people who are not celebrities being name-checked in xkcd? [[User:Andries|Andries]] ([[User talk:Andries|talk]]) 13:23, 6 February 2015 (UTC) | ||
− | Given that the article noted that the next generation would be, quote, "in control," I think Cueball's interpretation is...well, slightly less absurd than it would be otherwise. | + | Given that the article noted that the next generation would be, quote, "in control," I think Cueball's interpretation is...well, slightly less absurd than it would be otherwise. |
«Cueball: Like, when you're like, "She was like"?» What does that mean? --[[User:RenniePet|RenniePet]] ([[User talk:RenniePet|talk]]) 15:23, 6 February 2015 (UTC) | «Cueball: Like, when you're like, "She was like"?» What does that mean? --[[User:RenniePet|RenniePet]] ([[User talk:RenniePet|talk]]) 15:23, 6 February 2015 (UTC) |