Difference between revisions of "Talk:1523: Microdrones"
(A) |
|||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
does this reference P.K,Dick's "Vulcan's Hammer"? {{unsigned|Docski}} | does this reference P.K,Dick's "Vulcan's Hammer"? {{unsigned|Docski}} | ||
:Hmm... I don't think hammers are equal to drones, but interesting. [[User:Nk22|The Twenty-second. The Not So Only. The Nathan/Nk22]] ([[User talk:Nk22|talk]]) 16:56, 11 May 2015 (UTC) | :Hmm... I don't think hammers are equal to drones, but interesting. [[User:Nk22|The Twenty-second. The Not So Only. The Nathan/Nk22]] ([[User talk:Nk22|talk]]) 16:56, 11 May 2015 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | If you removed all regulations, drone theft would be legal. If it's on your property, it belongs to you. [[Special:Contributions/108.162.214.227|108.162.214.227]] 18:42, 11 May 2015 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 18:42, 11 May 2015
Did someone tried? I mean, can you really catch drone with butterfly net without damaging the drone or the net? -- Hkmaly (talk) 12:32, 11 May 2015 (UTC)
- I know people shoot them out of the air with guns and considering the height at which they're flying, it's possible. The Twenty-second. The Not So Only. The Nathan/Nk22 (talk) 12:47, 11 May 2015 (UTC)
- I think the Amazon bit is implying that Amazon is artificially making drone nets unavailable because of its own drone based delivery service. Feel free to rephrase it. 108.162.219.193 (talk) (please sign your comments with ~~~~)
does this reference P.K,Dick's "Vulcan's Hammer"? -- Docski (talk) (please sign your comments with ~~~~)
- Hmm... I don't think hammers are equal to drones, but interesting. The Twenty-second. The Not So Only. The Nathan/Nk22 (talk) 16:56, 11 May 2015 (UTC)
If you removed all regulations, drone theft would be legal. If it's on your property, it belongs to you. 108.162.214.227 18:42, 11 May 2015 (UTC)
