Difference between revisions of "Talk:1536: The Martian"
RAGBRAIvet (talk | contribs) m |
(Duct tape!) |
||
Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
:Looking at the synopsis on both, the only difference I see is that the old one has a monkey. I didn't like the movie knowing Matt Damon was in it. Now it is just worse. [[Special:Contributions/108.162.238.172|108.162.238.172]] 02:52, 11 June 2015 (UTC)BK201 | :Looking at the synopsis on both, the only difference I see is that the old one has a monkey. I didn't like the movie knowing Matt Damon was in it. Now it is just worse. [[Special:Contributions/108.162.238.172|108.162.238.172]] 02:52, 11 June 2015 (UTC)BK201 | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | If memory serves, the Apollo 13 CO2 canister fix included some duct tape. | ||
+ | [[Special:Contributions/173.245.52.77|173.245.52.77]] 23:20, 11 June 2015 (UTC) |
Revision as of 23:20, 11 June 2015
I'm too ẞ qwertz (talk) 05:46, 10 June 2015 (UTC)
It's clearly a trap. Matt Damon will try to kill them. 141.101.98.155 11:46, 10 June 2015 (UTC)
I've found the scene from Apollo 13 Cueball is referencing: [[1]] Dahooz (talk) 12:39, 10 June 2015 (UTC)
- Thanks was just asking for this in the incomplete mark. Then I noticed you had posted the link. It is now part of the explain. And it is also a great explanation of that the scene by TheHYPO. Seems complete to me now. --Kynde (talk) 19:04, 10 June 2015 (UTC)
The 'official' explanation says that "...the plot is a cross between Apollo 13 (but on Mars) and Robinson Crusoe." So is this a remake of — or have anything else in common with — the cheesy 1964 sci-fi classic "Robinson Crusoe on Mars"? RAGBRAIvet (talk) 17:03, 10 June 2015 (UTC)
- Looking at the synopsis on both, the only difference I see is that the old one has a monkey. I didn't like the movie knowing Matt Damon was in it. Now it is just worse. 108.162.238.172 02:52, 11 June 2015 (UTC)BK201
If memory serves, the Apollo 13 CO2 canister fix included some duct tape.
173.245.52.77 23:20, 11 June 2015 (UTC)