Editing Talk:154: Beliefs

Doesn't the girl have too long hair to be Megan? The official transcript just calls them 'girl' and  'professor'. –[[User:St.nerol|St.nerol]] ([[User talk:St.nerol|talk]]) 17:43, 22 June 2013 (UTC)
::Actually she looks more like Danish to me. {{unsigned|BruceJohnJennerLawso}}
:::They're just generic humans, stop trying to say "her hair is wrong for [character]". It's really dumb. -Pennpenn [[Special:Contributions/108.162.250.162|108.162.250.162]] 04:27, 9 July 2015 (UTC)
::::The girls is definately not [[Danish]]. Danish has some special personality traits (being mean and clever and not caring a thing about other). The hair is just a small thing. Also children are neither Megan nor Cueball as these are adults. I have removed reference to Danish. Actually it is the professor that looks like Megan! --[[User:Kynde|Kynde]] ([[User talk:Kynde|talk]]) 11:01, 28 December 2015 (UTC)
::::Randall definitely uses a specific cast of characters, each of which repeat characteristic behaviors & are recognizable primarily by consistent depiction of individual hairstyles. I encourage everyone to continue attempting to identify & thereby more fully understand each character, based upon their relative hairstyles & attitudes. (... "~ how are they connected? Hairstyles & attitudes, how do they relate? How well do we use our freedom to choose, the illusions we create?" - Timbuk 3) [[Special:Contributions/108.162.221.16|108.162.221.16]] 18:39, 27 May 2016 (UTC)
Actually, my question is whether the girl on the left is [[Science Girl]]. [[User:Hdjensofjfnen|Hdjensofjfnen]] ([[User talk:Hdjensofjfnen|talk]]) 19:53, 25 September 2018 (UTC)
::Almost has to be [[Science Girl]], or a prototype of her at least. [[User:Nitpicking|Nitpicking]] ([[User talk:Nitpicking|talk]]) 19:58, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
:::Reference to future readers: [[User:FaviFake]] has now granted Science Girl the name of [[Jill]] and converted various of the links to that (or to [[Hairbun]], but that's another story). As there should be no changes to other people's valid Talk contributions, this needs pointing out (more than it needs 'correcting'). [[Special:Contributions/172.70.85.93|172.70.85.93]] 14:54, 7 July 2023 (UTC) 
::::Thank you, I'm fairly new here and I didn't know it was considered bad practice to change the links in a talk page. I will be reverting all my edits tomorrow --[[User:FaviFake|FaviFake]] ([[User talk:FaviFake|talk]]) 21:17, 7 July 2023 (UTC)
::::Update: Luckly, this was the only talk page where I changed the links. I'm sorry for the trouble. I'm not sure this is the right place, but if anyone wants to discuss Science Girl becoming Jill or Science Girl vs. Hairbun feel free to do so on my talk page, or the community portal. --[[User:FaviFake|FaviFake]] ([[User talk:FaviFake|talk]]) 08:14, 8 July 2023 (UTC)

What needs to be pointed out more is that science is a system of working toward finding the truth, that requires its adherents to remember that they never actually know for certain. A lot of modern "scientists" follow the same bad methodology as adherents of the geocentric model and astrology once did. Cosmology and quantum mechanics are full of epicycles, deferents, positivism, and static projection. Einstein was correct to be horrified by that. —[[User:Kazvorpal|Kazvorpal]] ([[User talk:Kazvorpal|talk]]) 14:31, 29 September 2019 (UTC)
Latest revision		Your text
Line 10:		Line 10:
	::::Update: Luckly, this was the only talk page where I changed the links. I'm sorry for the trouble. I'm not sure this is the right place, but if anyone wants to discuss Science Girl becoming Jill or Science Girl vs. Hairbun feel free to do so on my talk page, or the community portal. --[[User:FaviFake\|FaviFake]] ([[User talk:FaviFake\|talk]]) 08:14, 8 July 2023 (UTC)		::::Update: Luckly, this was the only talk page where I changed the links. I'm sorry for the trouble. I'm not sure this is the right place, but if anyone wants to discuss Science Girl becoming Jill or Science Girl vs. Hairbun feel free to do so on my talk page, or the community portal. --[[User:FaviFake\|FaviFake]] ([[User talk:FaviFake\|talk]]) 08:14, 8 July 2023 (UTC)

−	What needs to be pointed out more is that science is a system of working toward finding the truth, that requires its adherents to remember that they never actually know for certain. A lot of modern "scientists" follow the same bad methodology as adherents of the geocentric model and astrology once did. Cosmology and quantum mechanics are full of epicycles, deferents, positivism, and static projection. Einstein ~~and Schrodinger were~~ correct to be horrified by that. —[[User:Kazvorpal\|Kazvorpal]] ([[User talk:Kazvorpal\|talk]]) 14:31, 29 September 2019 (UTC)	+	What needs to be pointed out more is that science is a system of working toward finding the truth, that requires its adherents to remember that they never actually know for certain. A lot of modern "scientists" follow the same bad methodology as adherents of the geocentric model and astrology once did. Cosmology and quantum mechanics are full of epicycles, deferents, positivism, and static projection. Einstein was correct to be horrified by that. —[[User:Kazvorpal\|Kazvorpal]] ([[User talk:Kazvorpal\|talk]]) 14:31, 29 September 2019 (UTC)