Talk:1627: Woosh

Looking for a joke that isn't there sounds a lot like xkcd.com/559. 162.158.2.140 05:43, 8 January 2016 (UTC)

Woooosh! 108.162.245.181 05:48, 8 January 2016 (UTC)

Woosh { 108.162.245.131 (talk) (please sign your comments with ~~~~)

Woof (Guess my bot still needs some work) 162.158.153.131 08:41, 8 January 2016 (UTC)

If it was a joke video that was never meant to be real to begin with and the commenter didn't realize this, then woosh would actually make sense Figvh (talk)

Woosh173.245.56.65 10:32, 8 January 2016 (UTC)

Probably in reaction to a video [1] that gained notoriety this week and raised a big discussion whether is was spontaneous or enacted. Duartix (talk) 11:16, 8 January 2016 (UTC)

• You mean [2]? -- Hkmaly (talk) 00:53, 10 January 2016 (UTC)

Of course bots that auto-reply to comments can have problems of their own. Let Reddit's lolpenisbot be a cautionary tale.162.158.152.203 21:26, 8 January 2016 (UTC)

Woosh 141.101.98.38 17:52, 9 January 2016 (UTC)

Woosh 141.101.98.38 17:52, 9 January 2016 (UTC)

Woosh 141.101.98.38 17:52, 9 January 2016 (UTC)

This comic seems to promote the same behaviour that he criticizes in xkcd.com/481, xkcd.com/810, xkcd.com/1258, and i'm sure others. I've seen a great deal of 'wooshing' in the past couple days, hopefully this disservice to the internet doesn't last.--162.158.152.131 11:12, 9 January 2016 (UTC)

Woosh Spongebog (talk) 21:29, 9 January 2016 (UTC)