Difference between revisions of "Talk:1789: Phone Numbers"
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
"Another reason I never call people." I can't remember any previous reason given, can anyone else? --[[Special:Contributions/162.158.88.68|162.158.88.68]] 10:33, 24 January 2017 (UTC) | "Another reason I never call people." I can't remember any previous reason given, can anyone else? --[[Special:Contributions/162.158.88.68|162.158.88.68]] 10:33, 24 January 2017 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | The statement in the explanation that most cell phones can't save such detailed information is incorrect. Android and iOS both allow setting custom types for phone numbers. [[Special:Contributions/162.158.79.113|162.158.79.113]] 12:09, 24 January 2017 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 12:09, 24 January 2017
Shouldn't this explanation mention the reason for this comic? Google updating Google Voice for the first time in 5 years? [1] 108.162.216.226 22:14, 23 January 2017 (UTC)
I've definitely seen this comic before. Deja vu? OfftheRails (talk) 20:56, 23 January 2017 (UTC)
#1254 162.158.74.219 21:44, 23 January 2017 (UTC)
“Also White Hat never actually answers the question originally posed by Cueball.” – AFAIS he should use the #2 (the Google voice one). --DaB. (talk) 20:58, 23 January 2017 (UTC)
He sort of does answer the question: The Google voice number should be used. This is number 2, since 1 is cell, 3 doesn't do texts (Google voice does), 4 is obsolete, and 5 is work.162.158.214.46 06:34, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
"Another reason I never call people." I can't remember any previous reason given, can anyone else? --162.158.88.68 10:33, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
The statement in the explanation that most cell phones can't save such detailed information is incorrect. Android and iOS both allow setting custom types for phone numbers. 162.158.79.113 12:09, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
