Difference between revisions of "Talk:17: What If"
(Created page with "We can infer that it ultimately wasn't everything it should be? Firstly, then-girlfriend could also mean current wife (remember the title text is Randall speaking, not Cueball...") |
|||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
Also, I think that the Fractal nature of the card is to reflect that all these questions, and the actual attraction depicted pictorially, will always be a part of the relationship, staying the same at all "levels" - which, to me, IS the romance. | Also, I think that the Fractal nature of the card is to reflect that all these questions, and the actual attraction depicted pictorially, will always be a part of the relationship, staying the same at all "levels" - which, to me, IS the romance. | ||
| + | |||
| + | : Randall wrote "then-girlfriend" in <span style="text-decoration:underline" title="I'm unsure of whether the title-text was present on LiveJournal">2005-2006</span>, and only got married in [http://blog.xkcd.com/2011/09/12/672/ 2011]. [[Special:Contributions/128.211.198.17|128.211.198.17]] 21:14, 12 October 2012 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 21:14, 12 October 2012
We can infer that it ultimately wasn't everything it should be? Firstly, then-girlfriend could also mean current wife (remember the title text is Randall speaking, not Cueball).
Also, I think that the Fractal nature of the card is to reflect that all these questions, and the actual attraction depicted pictorially, will always be a part of the relationship, staying the same at all "levels" - which, to me, IS the romance.
- Randall wrote "then-girlfriend" in 2005-2006, and only got married in 2011. 128.211.198.17 21:14, 12 October 2012 (UTC)
