Difference between revisions of "Talk:1929: Argument Timing"
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
I would expect the integral under the red line to be much higher - Facebook and like have cheapened the meaning of friendship to the point I don't even KNOW a lot of my so called friends[[Special:Contributions/162.158.126.64|162.158.126.64]] 00:30, 17 December 2017 (UTC) | I would expect the integral under the red line to be much higher - Facebook and like have cheapened the meaning of friendship to the point I don't even KNOW a lot of my so called friends[[Special:Contributions/162.158.126.64|162.158.126.64]] 00:30, 17 December 2017 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | And this is why I don't use Facebook. ---- | ||
Revision as of 10:03, 17 December 2017
In addition to the many arguments that might occur through early morning or late night texting, it is also possible that a lot of arguments occur at those times because the facebook and texting activities at those hours interfere with normal healthy life activity and start with one's partner saying something like, "put the phone away and go to sleep". Rtanenbaum (talk) 16:54, 15 December 2017 (UTC)
Hopefully someone more talented in maths can calculate if the integrals are identical 🤔 162.158.93.21 16:56, 15 December 2017 (UTC)
The graph doesn't say if the probability is per unit time (eg per day), per friendship or per failed friendship. Only in the last case would the integral be 1. For the others you might expect the total probability to be higher now than it was, because it's so much easier.141.101.104.161 22:12, 15 December 2017 (UTC)
Gonna be honest, expected a Net Neutrality comic. DPS2004'); DROP TABLE users;-- (talk) 17:04, 15 December 2017 (UTC)
I would expect the integral under the red line to be much higher - Facebook and like have cheapened the meaning of friendship to the point I don't even KNOW a lot of my so called friends162.158.126.64 00:30, 17 December 2017 (UTC)
And this is why I don't use Facebook. ----
