Editing Talk:194: Penises
|
Please sign your posts with ~~~~ |
Warning: You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you log in or create an account, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
The edit can be undone.
Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then save the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
| Latest revision | Your text | ||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
:Note that "watching monster-cock porn" is not the opposite of "leading a very sheltered life". A quick google search showed that 97% of men are 8 inches or less. Within the normal rules of probability, Megan is correct. {{unsigned ip|108.162.219.58}} | :Note that "watching monster-cock porn" is not the opposite of "leading a very sheltered life". A quick google search showed that 97% of men are 8 inches or less. Within the normal rules of probability, Megan is correct. {{unsigned ip|108.162.219.58}} | ||
:A few points. First, if you're a straight man who doesn't take porn at face (or penis) value, you're not necessarily sheltered, you just don't have a large sample size (one?). Second, even accepting your uncited fact, that still leaves a pretty wide range. A penis of 4-5 inches is noticeably different in size than one of 7-8. [[User:Erronius|Erronius]] ([[User talk:Erronius|talk]]) 06:02, 7 April 2014 (UTC) | :A few points. First, if you're a straight man who doesn't take porn at face (or penis) value, you're not necessarily sheltered, you just don't have a large sample size (one?). Second, even accepting your uncited fact, that still leaves a pretty wide range. A penis of 4-5 inches is noticeably different in size than one of 7-8. [[User:Erronius|Erronius]] ([[User talk:Erronius|talk]]) 06:02, 7 April 2014 (UTC) | ||
| β | |||
Could "flow of spam" be a pun on a word that sounds like "spam"? | Could "flow of spam" be a pun on a word that sounds like "spam"? | ||
