Difference between revisions of "Talk:2111: Opportunity Rover"
m |
(Sorry, typo) |
||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
[[Special:Contributions/162.158.106.30|162.158.106.30]] 18:13, 13 February 2019 (UTC) | [[Special:Contributions/162.158.106.30|162.158.106.30]] 18:13, 13 February 2019 (UTC) | ||
| − | I am pretty sure that this is not the place to discuss how NASA handles its budget. Whilst I agree with the basic sentiment (NASA's usage of its tax-payer sourced budget is not what one may call efficient), I do believe that this is a site used for explaining the meaning of the comic xkcd, rather than to discuss the problems with the expenditure of a government run space agency. As such I believe this reversion is positive. If someone has a good reason to keep it in, feel free to revert it (a comment would be nice though [[541|:)]]). Also, if the original user wants to rephrase it from something that sounds like it belongs on | + | I am pretty sure that this is not the place to discuss how NASA handles its budget. Whilst I agree with the basic sentiment (NASA's usage of its tax-payer sourced budget is not what one may call efficient), I do believe that this is a site used for explaining the meaning of the comic xkcd, rather than to discuss the problems with the expenditure of a government run space agency. As such I believe this reversion is positive. If someone has a good reason to keep it in, feel free to revert it (a comment would be nice though [[541|:)]]). Also, if the original user wants to rephrase it from something that sounds like it belongs on evilgovernmentconspiracies.net.onion, feel free [[User:Cyclic3|Cyclic3]] ([[User talk:Cyclic3|talk]]) 18:15, 13 February 2019 (UTC) |
Revision as of 18:17, 13 February 2019
The subject of this comic, the Opportunity Rover, is being officially declared dead today, the day the comic was released. I wonder how long this comic has been ready, waiting to eulogize the rover. Blaisepascal (talk) 18:03, 13 February 2019 (UTC)
Why the fuck are you censoring me? 162.158.106.30 18:13, 13 February 2019 (UTC)
I am pretty sure that this is not the place to discuss how NASA handles its budget. Whilst I agree with the basic sentiment (NASA's usage of its tax-payer sourced budget is not what one may call efficient), I do believe that this is a site used for explaining the meaning of the comic xkcd, rather than to discuss the problems with the expenditure of a government run space agency. As such I believe this reversion is positive. If someone has a good reason to keep it in, feel free to revert it (a comment would be nice though :)). Also, if the original user wants to rephrase it from something that sounds like it belongs on evilgovernmentconspiracies.net.onion, feel free Cyclic3 (talk) 18:15, 13 February 2019 (UTC)
