Difference between revisions of "Talk:2303: Error Types"
m (Signed) |
(made joke. is funny.) |
||
Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
:Looks like a typo to me. Randall's patrons should have caught this for him! | :Looks like a typo to me. Randall's patrons should have caught this for him! | ||
:[[User:ProphetZarquon|ProphetZarquon]] ([[User talk:ProphetZarquon|talk]]) 23:07, 6 May 2020 (UTC) | :[[User:ProphetZarquon|ProphetZarquon]] ([[User talk:ProphetZarquon|talk]]) 23:07, 6 May 2020 (UTC) | ||
+ | |||
+ | ::That particular mistake is actually just called a type error. | ||
+ | ::[[Special:Contributions/162.158.62.221|162.158.62.221]] 23:12, 6 May 2020 (UTC) |
Revision as of 23:12, 6 May 2020
As of the time of this post, the title text is "Type IIII error: Mistaking tally marks for Roman neumerals". Is "neumerals" a typo, or is there a joke in there that I'm missing? Cosmogoblin (talk) 22:52, 6 May 2020 (UTC)
- Looks like a typo to me. Randall's patrons should have caught this for him!
- ProphetZarquon (talk) 23:07, 6 May 2020 (UTC)
- That particular mistake is actually just called a type error.
- 162.158.62.221 23:12, 6 May 2020 (UTC)