Difference between revisions of "Talk:2456: Types of Scientific Paper"
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
[[Special:Contributions/172.68.132.45|172.68.132.45]] 21:04, 28 April 2021 (UTC) | [[Special:Contributions/172.68.132.45|172.68.132.45]] 21:04, 28 April 2021 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | True. Do you think we should add another column describing the pictured paper to the explanation chart? | ||
| + | [[User:Reywas|Reywas]] ([[User talk:Reywas|talk]]) 21:06, 28 April 2021 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 21:06, 28 April 2021
I've a feeling we could find actual papers that paraphrase down to those in the comic. Also, lol at the 500 scientists' "citation" section. 162.158.159.104 20:36, 28 April 2021 (UTC)
As we edit this we should probably pay attention to the content / layout of the article images: The number of lines beneath the title and layout of each "paper" he's drawn could be relevant to the joke. For example, the "500 scientists" presumably have a massive authors list, and the one on how "everyone else is doing it wrong" has a single author and a particularly "article-esque" layout.
172.68.132.45 21:04, 28 April 2021 (UTC)
True. Do you think we should add another column describing the pictured paper to the explanation chart? Reywas (talk) 21:06, 28 April 2021 (UTC)
