Difference between revisions of "Talk:257: Code Talkers"
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
I am a little bit disappointed of Randall, that he didn't hid a secret message here. 101010000100110 doesn't translate in to anything (If you fill in the missing number). [[User:Nils w|Nils w]] ([[User talk:Nils w|talk]]) 11:44, 30 January 2014 (UTC) | I am a little bit disappointed of Randall, that he didn't hid a secret message here. 101010000100110 doesn't translate in to anything (If you fill in the missing number). [[User:Nils w|Nils w]] ([[User talk:Nils w|talk]]) 11:44, 30 January 2014 (UTC) | ||
: Since the binary data is said to be encrypted, it could contain any secret message you'd like, you just have to apply the right {{w|one-time pad}}. Hiding a plaintext message in a sequence told to be encrypted would be unlike Randall, don't you think? [[Special:Contributions/141.101.81.220|141.101.81.220]] 13:26, 16 May 2014 (UTC) | : Since the binary data is said to be encrypted, it could contain any secret message you'd like, you just have to apply the right {{w|one-time pad}}. Hiding a plaintext message in a sequence told to be encrypted would be unlike Randall, don't you think? [[Special:Contributions/141.101.81.220|141.101.81.220]] 13:26, 16 May 2014 (UTC) | ||
| + | : All people always try is trying to interpret zeroes and ones as ascii codepoints... In this case it would actually just be T&. Does it mean anything? Well it's all in the *printable* and *first 127* ASCII characters so it might as well anyway. | ||
Revision as of 09:59, 8 August 2014
I am a little bit disappointed of Randall, that he didn't hid a secret message here. 101010000100110 doesn't translate in to anything (If you fill in the missing number). Nils w (talk) 11:44, 30 January 2014 (UTC)
- Since the binary data is said to be encrypted, it could contain any secret message you'd like, you just have to apply the right one-time pad. Hiding a plaintext message in a sequence told to be encrypted would be unlike Randall, don't you think? 141.101.81.220 13:26, 16 May 2014 (UTC)
- All people always try is trying to interpret zeroes and ones as ascii codepoints... In this case it would actually just be T&. Does it mean anything? Well it's all in the *printable* and *first 127* ASCII characters so it might as well anyway.
