Difference between revisions of "Talk:2683: Fan Theories"
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
I am 100% behind calling hypotheses 'fan theories'. [[User:Fephisto|Fephisto]] ([[User talk:Fephisto|talk]]) 16:45, 11 October 2022 (UTC) | I am 100% behind calling hypotheses 'fan theories'. [[User:Fephisto|Fephisto]] ([[User talk:Fephisto|talk]]) 16:45, 11 October 2022 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | To the person who inserted the {{Template|Citation needed}} initially unsuccessfully by <nowiki>[[citation needed]]</nowiki>, and complained in their edit summaries that no other place uses our formatting (of {{}}s)... That's how Wikipedia implements it (or at least the actual Citation Needed... see below) and [[]]s/[]s are for more general hyperlinking (internal and external). You aren't thinking of some BBCode plugin for forums, are you? They will use [tags] and [tag][/tag], and I could imagine a popular tweak to the tag-handler to not require writing <code>[sup][[u][color=#whatever]citation needed[/color][/u]][/sup]</code>, or similar, every time someone wanted to parody (or ''properly'' apply?) the meme...<br />...although, reading your intention, did you instead intend to use the explainxkcd version that is {{Template|Actual citation needed}}? I can imagine another editor removing it, anyway, but I just moved it the more accepted side of the punctuation. [[Special:Contributions/172.70.85.49|172.70.85.49]] 18:41, 11 October 2022 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 18:41, 11 October 2022
To me, the title text seems to be referring to the opposite kind of fandom compared to what the current explanation says. 141.101.76.203 06:54, 11 October 2022 (UTC)
Given the constant stream of manchildren vandalizing this, could an admin please restrict editing access to logged in users? 172.68.110.143 07:50, 11 October 2022 (UTC)
I am 100% behind calling hypotheses 'fan theories'. Fephisto (talk) 16:45, 11 October 2022 (UTC)
To the person who inserted the {{Citation needed}} initially unsuccessfully by [[citation needed]], and complained in their edit summaries that no other place uses our formatting (of {{}}s)... That's how Wikipedia implements it (or at least the actual Citation Needed... see below) and [[]]s/[]s are for more general hyperlinking (internal and external). You aren't thinking of some BBCode plugin for forums, are you? They will use [tags] and [tag][/tag], and I could imagine a popular tweak to the tag-handler to not require writing [sup][[u][color=#whatever]citation needed[/color][/u]][/sup], or similar, every time someone wanted to parody (or properly apply?) the meme...
...although, reading your intention, did you instead intend to use the explainxkcd version that is {{Actual citation needed}}? I can imagine another editor removing it, anyway, but I just moved it the more accepted side of the punctuation. 172.70.85.49 18:41, 11 October 2022 (UTC)
