Difference between revisions of "Talk:297: Lisp Cycles"

Explain xkcd: It's 'cause you're dumb.
Jump to: navigation, search
 
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
Line 10: Line 10:
  
 
(after I read title-text) Noooo! That's impossible!!! [[Special:Contributions/108.162.246.59|108.162.246.59]] 21:33, 26 April 2017 (UTC)
 
(after I read title-text) Noooo! That's impossible!!! [[Special:Contributions/108.162.246.59|108.162.246.59]] 21:33, 26 April 2017 (UTC)
 +
 +
The stack of parenthesis looks like the ASCII art version of a lightsaber blade. - Fox [[Special:Contributions/162.158.62.183|162.158.62.183]] 06:50, 9 October 2018 (UTC)
 +
 +
LisP was intended to be a language for self-programming, AI code. In this day of people falsely usurping the term "artificial intelligence" for mere machine learning, I'm disappointed they're not using LISP in that way. They're such poseurs. —[[User:Kazvorpal|Kazvorpal]] ([[User talk:Kazvorpal|talk]]) 22:38, 3 November 2019 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 22:38, 3 November 2019

Soon, I shall be one of those new coders. I shall be learning (Racket) Scheme, actually. Greyson (talk) 16:10, 16 December 2013 (UTC)

Georgia Tech's College of Computing did away with Lisp and Smalltalk as of 1999 or 2000. It is now C, or some version thereof, all the way down. This change has its own perils! 108.162.238.189 (talk) (please sign your comments with ~~~~)

I am a little saddened that this comment section doesn't have at least a few Star Wars quotes with coding/programming references mixed in. -Pennpenn 108.162.250.162 05:21, 17 August 2015 (UTC)

Do or do not. If except NameError:, then var = 0. Papayaman1000 (talk) 13:09, 7 December 2016 (UTC)

Let's go back to 1986 and learn Scheme in Lecture 1A | MIT 6.001 Structure and Interpretation, 1986! Alex Vong 173.245.62.65 03:36, 19 August 2015 (UTC)

(after I read title-text) Noooo! That's impossible!!! 108.162.246.59 21:33, 26 April 2017 (UTC)

The stack of parenthesis looks like the ASCII art version of a lightsaber blade. - Fox 162.158.62.183 06:50, 9 October 2018 (UTC)

LisP was intended to be a language for self-programming, AI code. In this day of people falsely usurping the term "artificial intelligence" for mere machine learning, I'm disappointed they're not using LISP in that way. They're such poseurs. —Kazvorpal (talk) 22:38, 3 November 2019 (UTC)