Difference between revisions of "Talk:30: Donner"

Explain xkcd: It's 'cause you're dumb.
Jump to: navigation, search
m
Line 4: Line 4:
  
 
Outside of the obvious pointed out by the previous user: the restaurant, Joe's, could be a reference to Tex Avery's Eat at Joe's. In one of the episodes, the customers were eaten by 'Joe'. The cannibalism scenario works out as well.  [[User:Torappu|Torappu]] ([[User talk:Torappu|talk]]) 18:48, 24 June 2013 (UTC)
 
Outside of the obvious pointed out by the previous user: the restaurant, Joe's, could be a reference to Tex Avery's Eat at Joe's. In one of the episodes, the customers were eaten by 'Joe'. The cannibalism scenario works out as well.  [[User:Torappu|Torappu]] ([[User talk:Torappu|talk]]) 18:48, 24 June 2013 (UTC)
 +
 +
----
 +
 +
I disagree with the original interpretation. The party of three was, I believe, more likely concerned by an additional, undepicted party, also waiting to eat at the establishment, and possibly fearing for their own safety from said cannibalism.--[[User:StrangerDanger|StrangerDanger]] ([[User talk:StrangerDanger|talk]]) 20:46, 27 June 2013 (UTC)

Revision as of 20:46, 27 June 2013

The indication is that they were waiting a long time for the table and decided to eat one of their companions. -- ‎64.85.162.210 (talk) (please sign your comments with ~~~~)


Outside of the obvious pointed out by the previous user: the restaurant, Joe's, could be a reference to Tex Avery's Eat at Joe's. In one of the episodes, the customers were eaten by 'Joe'. The cannibalism scenario works out as well. Torappu (talk) 18:48, 24 June 2013 (UTC)


I disagree with the original interpretation. The party of three was, I believe, more likely concerned by an additional, undepicted party, also waiting to eat at the establishment, and possibly fearing for their own safety from said cannibalism.--StrangerDanger (talk) 20:46, 27 June 2013 (UTC)