Difference between revisions of "Talk:332: Gyroscopes"
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
"At the title text Randall is claiming mankind did not land on the moon because of lack of precession." should perhaps be more "...mankind did not land on the moon, but that (the existence of) precession mad it ''look'' like we did." At least, that's how ''I'' read that. [[Special:Contributions/178.98.31.27|178.98.31.27]] 09:13, 19 June 2013 (UTC) | "At the title text Randall is claiming mankind did not land on the moon because of lack of precession." should perhaps be more "...mankind did not land on the moon, but that (the existence of) precession mad it ''look'' like we did." At least, that's how ''I'' read that. [[Special:Contributions/178.98.31.27|178.98.31.27]] 09:13, 19 June 2013 (UTC) | ||
:I also think whoever wrote that bit about the gyroscopes helping the planes hit their targets is completely missing the humor Randall was shooting for. He wasn't being serious, much as he wasn't with the moon line. He was implying, as a conspiracy theory, that gyroscopes are sentient, and it was at their bidding that the attacks happened.{{unsigned ip|152.119.255.250}} | :I also think whoever wrote that bit about the gyroscopes helping the planes hit their targets is completely missing the humor Randall was shooting for. He wasn't being serious, much as he wasn't with the moon line. He was implying, as a conspiracy theory, that gyroscopes are sentient, and it was at their bidding that the attacks happened.{{unsigned ip|152.119.255.250}} | ||
| + | [[Wikipedia:Lunar precession|Lunar precession]] must be one of the oldest significant "stubs" still to be in a bad place. It didn't even have the article name at the beginning and bold. —[[User:Kazvorpal|Kazvorpal]] ([[User talk:Kazvorpal|talk]]) 15:48, 9 November 2019 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 15:48, 9 November 2019
"At the title text Randall is claiming mankind did not land on the moon because of lack of precession." should perhaps be more "...mankind did not land on the moon, but that (the existence of) precession mad it look like we did." At least, that's how I read that. 178.98.31.27 09:13, 19 June 2013 (UTC)
- I also think whoever wrote that bit about the gyroscopes helping the planes hit their targets is completely missing the humor Randall was shooting for. He wasn't being serious, much as he wasn't with the moon line. He was implying, as a conspiracy theory, that gyroscopes are sentient, and it was at their bidding that the attacks happened. 152.119.255.250 (talk) (please sign your comments with ~~~~)
Lunar precession must be one of the oldest significant "stubs" still to be in a bad place. It didn't even have the article name at the beginning and bold. —Kazvorpal (talk) 15:48, 9 November 2019 (UTC)
