Difference between revisions of "Talk:384: The Drake Equation"

Explain xkcd: It's 'cause you're dumb.
Jump to: navigation, search
m
Line 3: Line 3:
 
Bs looks more like B6 [[Special:Contributions/162.158.79.185|162.158.79.185]] 17:03, 13 March 2019 (UTC)
 
Bs looks more like B6 [[Special:Contributions/162.158.79.185|162.158.79.185]] 17:03, 13 March 2019 (UTC)
  
The title text shows a lack of imagination about how aliens could communicate. It need not be that they're using narrow direction and different bands. First, they could be using radio in a way that wouldn't be detected, much as no WWII radio expert would recognize modern, digital, encoded cell tower transmissions. Second, there may be other means of communicating over distance, like entangled particles. —[[User:Kazvorpal|Kazvorpal]] ([[User talk:Kazvorpal|talk]]) 07:50, 10 November 2019 (UTC)
+
The title text shows a lack of imagination about how aliens could communicate. It need not be that they're using narrow direction and different bands. First, they could be using radio in a way that wouldn't be detected, much as how no WWII radio expert would recognize modern, digital, encoded cell tower transmissions. Second, there may be other means of communicating over distance, like entangled particles. —[[User:Kazvorpal|Kazvorpal]] ([[User talk:Kazvorpal|talk]]) 07:50, 10 November 2019 (UTC)

Revision as of 07:51, 10 November 2019

Looks like someone mixed up Frank Drake and Francis Drake --Btx40 (talk) 14:32, 19 February 2013 (UTC)

Bs looks more like B6 162.158.79.185 17:03, 13 March 2019 (UTC)

The title text shows a lack of imagination about how aliens could communicate. It need not be that they're using narrow direction and different bands. First, they could be using radio in a way that wouldn't be detected, much as how no WWII radio expert would recognize modern, digital, encoded cell tower transmissions. Second, there may be other means of communicating over distance, like entangled particles. —Kazvorpal (talk) 07:50, 10 November 2019 (UTC)