Talk:451: Impostor

It could be that no one understands the literary criticism, even if they read it. The panel shows a student listening to Cueball. A fun, alternative explanation is that Cueball has found his real niche! A natural genius in literary criticism! (I know that's not what he's driving at. Stick with my first explanation.)Theo (talk) 13:22, 13 August 2013 (UTC)

I know this is easy to find, but the wikipedia article on deconstruction is very relevant. There should be a link in the explanation. 108.162.219.7 01:05, 30 April 2014 (UTC)

I believe the multiple issues listed in the Deconstruction Wikipedia article speak for themselves:

This article has multiple issues. Please help improve it or discuss these issues on the talk page.

• This article contains too many or too-lengthy quotations for an encyclopedic entry. (February 2014)
• This article may be confusing or unclear to readers. (February 2014)
• This article may be too technical for most readers to understand. (February 2014)
• This article's introduction may be too long for the overall article length. (February 2014)
• This article may need to be rewritten entirely to comply with Wikipedia's quality standards. (February 2014)
• The neutrality of this article is disputed. (February 2014)

199.27.133.5 20:10, 27 June 2014 (UTC)