Difference between revisions of "Talk:531: Contingency Plan"

Explain xkcd: It's 'cause you're dumb.
Jump to: navigation, search
(Created page with "I don't think the idea is that the parents would kill the child if something went wrong (that would not be responsible parenting.) I think the idea is that the child would no...")
 
Line 1: Line 1:
I don't think the idea is that the parents would kill the child if something went wrong (that would not be responsible parenting.)  I think the idea is that the child would not be able to run away from home and there would be no incentive for someone to kidnap the child, since it could not live without insulin from the parents.
+
I don't think the idea is that the parents would kill the child if something went wrong (that would not be responsible parenting.)  I think the idea is that the child would not be able to run away from home and there would be no incentive for someone to kidnap the child, since it could not live without insulin from the parents. {{unsigned ip|‎213.203.138.251}}

Revision as of 10:02, 12 May 2013

I don't think the idea is that the parents would kill the child if something went wrong (that would not be responsible parenting.) I think the idea is that the child would not be able to run away from home and there would be no incentive for someone to kidnap the child, since it could not live without insulin from the parents. ‎213.203.138.251 (talk) (please sign your comments with ~~~~)